The Movement Reloaded
You are the change in the world. If you don't change,
the world won't change.
It's time to undergo your
appointed metamorphosis ... from grub to hero, from worm to God.
Change is the basis of everything, and the thing most
in need of change isn't the world but always yourself. When you change, you
will see the world with brand new eyes, you will see that all things are
possible, and you will see a thousand new beginnings.
Step up your game, motherfuckers. Bring your "A" game
or don't bother showing up. Who wants the second best, the second rate, the
half-hearted, the mediocre?
The Movement wants only the achievers, the talented,
those who can make things happen rather than just talking about it or moaning
The Most Forsaken Place in the Universe
In Dante's vision of hell, a vestibule stands between the gates of hell and the river Acheron (the river of woe) where Charon the Boatman ferries the damned across the fast-moving river of pitch-black water to the First Circle of Hell, Hell proper.
As they pass through the vestibule, the souls of the damned encounter a strange sight - the Lost Souls. While the damned don't linger in the vestibule for long - they're just passing through - the group of Lost Souls is trapped there ... forever! These are the souls rejected by both heaven and hell. Heaven shut its gates to them, and hell doesn't want them, so they have nowhere to go. They have no home. They are lost in No Man's Land.
What did they do to suffer this fate? These were the
souls that refused to support one side or the other in life - they were the
neutrals, the uncommitted, those who lived for themselves, those who joined no
cause except their own. They did not choose either good or evil but lived their
lives without making any conscious moral choices whatsoever. They were cynical
and skeptical, always calculating their personal advantage.
In Christian mythology, when Lucifer's angels rebelled
against God, and Michael the Archangel led the loyal angels against them, many
angels remained neutral, standing on the sidelines, waiting to see who would
win. When God cast down the rebel angels into hell, he made sure he cast down
these neutrals too, but they were no more wanted by Satan than by God, so they
remained permanently on the near side of hell's river, banned from ever
crossing, and equally banned from ever leaving.
Such is the destiny of those who refuse to choose a
cause, who refuse to commit, refuse to follow a banner. They are called the Ignavi, and they are the most pathetic
and ignoble of all creatures. They are the Last Men, the opposite of the
Supermen. They are the feeble, laughable creatures that remain when heaven and
hell have received all of the souls they are willing to take.
The Ignavi are the selfish, the self-obsessed, always
looking for their own benefit, and never willing to choose a side, never
willing to fight, to risk themselves, to make any sacrifices. Their calculation
is always the same: let others fight it out and then see how the land lies at
the end when the smoke clears. See what opportunities there are to gain profit
for themselves ... you know, like free-market capitalists. They are the
cowardly "neutrals" who refuse to side with any cause until it's obvious who's
winning (i.e. they have no ideological commitment and would support whoever
won, thus maximizing their self-interest). Most of humanity belong to the
Ignavi, not to the Damned or the Saved. Neither God nor the Devil has anything
but contempt for them.
The fate of the Ignavi is a terrible one. They are
condemned to run naked forever behind a blank banner (the flag of all those
with no cause except themselves), fluttering one way and then another (i.e.
never settling into a definite position reflecting a definite cause), and which
they can never catch (just as they could never catch a cause in life).
As they chase the flag, they are ceaselessly stung by
hornets and wasps. With each sting, blood and putrid matter leak from them,
feeding the writhing mass of worms and maggots that they are forced to run
across. In life, they refused to be stung by any cause, and now they are stung
without end. The worms write bloody, insulting messages in the soil in an
The Ignavi's cries of woe are unremitting. The air is
continually rent with their shrieks, shouts, screams, and lamentations. Their torment
has no end.
"This miserable state [Dante is informed by his guide Virgil]
is endured by the dreary souls of those who lived without blame and without
praise. They are mixed with the cowardly choir of angels who were not
rebellious, nor were loyal to God, but were for themselves. Heaven drove them
forth to keep its splendour from being sullied; and the depths of hell receives
them not, for the wicked would thus have some glory over them…The world allows
no report of them to exist. Mercy and justice disdain them. Do not speak of
them, but look and pass on."
"I looked and saw a whirling banner that went by so quickly
that it seemed it would never pause; and behind it came so long a train of
people that I should never have believed death had undone so many … These
wretches, who were never truly alive, were naked and viciously stung by wasps
and hornets that made their faces stream with blood, which, mixed with their
tears, dripped to their feet, and disgusting maggots collected in the pus." -
Well, will Heaven and Hell alike deny you entry? What
is your sacred cause? What moral decisions have you taken? How have you ever
served anyone or anything other than yourself? Are you fated to reside in the
Ante-Inferno for all time? This barren, hopeless place is within the perimeter
of hell, yet not truly part of it. It's Neverland.
Being pious, Dante tells us, is more than a matter of
simply not sinning. Unlike the non-committal souls, you must actively practise
virtue and side with the righteous. You have to be on the right side, not the wrong one, and not in the neutral, agnostic middle. You must make a leap.
You must choose and commit.
The Great Refusal
"I hate journalists. There is nothing in them but tittering
jeering emptiness. They have all made what Dante calls the Great Refusal. The
shallowest people on the ridge of the earth." - W.B. Yeats
Are you one of the great refusers, one of the
cynical, sneering trolls - the utterly empty, blank, pointless people who have
nothing constructive to offer the world?
"That which has always been accepted by everyone,
everywhere, is almost certain to be false." - Paul Valery
The Blank Banner
Are you a follower of the blank banner of the Ignavi,
the most pathetic flag there can possibly be? The blank banner is for all empty,
non-committal souls. It's for those who backed no clear side, supported no
clear leader, and simply ran back and forth with no direction, other than their
own comfort and advantage. There is nothing worse and more dismal than to be a
follower of this banner.
If you have chosen no sacred cause in life, if you
haven't chosen sides, the blank banner is YOUR banner.
Since they were neither good nor evil, the Ignavi have
no place in the afterlife. They might as well never have existed. They were
pointless people who made no impression. Is that you too?
Ante-hell, the vestibule of hell, is also called "Nowhere".
It's the eternal home of the Ignavi, the most pathetic souls of all, the souls that
ought never to have existed, those that made no choices in life, "who lived a
life but lived it with no blame and no praise". It includes those agnostics too
self-absorbed to make choices, those who were neither hot nor cold on important
matters. They neither believed nor disbelieved, neither knew nor didn't know,
neither blasphemed nor opposed the blasphemers, neither stood for free speech
nor against it.
Now, they run about the hills of Ante-Hell forever,
having no hope of dying to end their misery, doing nothing but chasing banners (causes)
they will never catch.
You are not saved because you have done nothing wrong.
You must do something right. You must choose. You must leap one way or another.
You must commit.
The worst places in hell are reserved for those who, in
times of great moral crisis, maintained their neutrality, who sat on the face
and refused to take part. Are you one of those who will dwell permanently on the
edge of hell?
Life isn't a spectator sport. You must be involved.
The Bronze Jars
In some tellings, the Ignavi ended up inside bronze
jars, scattered about the vestibule's great plain of mud and dirt. The voices
of those trapped inside the jars could be faintly heard through the walls of
the jars, but not enough to be intelligible, although it was assumed they were
begging to be helped, or to be put out of their misery once and for all.
Because these people chose no cause, they don't deserve
to be heard. They are voiceless to the rest of the world. Is that you? Or is
your voice that of the pointless troll with nothing positive to say, who does
nothing but snipe at others to big himself up?
The River Acheron
Any soul that has any physical contact whatsoever
with the River Acheron is trapped forever in that infernal, cursed river,
indescribably cold and bleak. These helpless and hopeless souls are fully aware
but unable to move. Is that like your life?
The Gate of Hell
Above the Gate of Hell is a foreboding inscription on
the lintel, saying that this is the way to the city of desolation and eternal
sorrow, of hopeless suffering and punishment, but created out of divine
THROUGH ME YOU PASS INTO THE CITY OF WOE,
THROUGH ME YOU PASS INTO ETERNAL PAIN,
THROUGH ME YOU PASS INTO THE DAMNED.
JUSTICE MOVED MY HEAVENLY ARCHITECT;
TO MAKE ME WAS THE TASK OF DIVINE POWER,
AND SUPREME WISDOM JOINED WITH ETERNAL LOVE.
BEFORE ME WERE CREATED ONLY ETERNAL THINGS,
AND I ENDURE ETERNALLY.
ABANDON ALL HOPE, YE WHO ENTER HERE.
The Arch of
Once you enter hell, you never again see anything of
the outside world. In hell, there is no sun. Nothing shines at all. There is no light. There is only "darkness visible", as Milton put it.
Between heaven and hell is "Nowhere" - the vestibule
of hell, the place of all the Nobody People, the No Men of No Man's Land. This
is where all the agnostic, non-committal, neutral people, all those who failed
or refused to make any choices in life, must now run around forever looking for
something to cling to, to commit to, to have as a cause.
Face up to your demons and they'll vanish before you
know it! Refuse to do so, and they will haunt you forever.
The New Zombies
"Had an interesting dream/nightmare about the zombie
apocalypse. The zombies were intelligent, and the more people they ate, the
more intelligent they got. And they hunted out the most intelligent. The stupid
people were just snacks/junk food. I was running around with a group of random
people trying to outsmart these mega intelligent zombies! Arrggaaagh!" - SB
The Failure of the West
The West is being destroyed by its own lack of
purpose and values, by its toxic liberalism and negative libertarianism, by its
catastrophic avoidance of producing an identity in its citizens. "Going
shopping" is not an identity. Voting every few years for someone you dislike
less than some other guy isn't an identity.
People find an identity in a sacred cause, and the two
main drivers of the West - capitalist materialism and scientific materialism -
both flee from sacred causes as fast as they can.
They equally characterize reality as meaningless,
purposeless, pointless, trivial, materialistic ... as being all about soulless
commodities, soulless things, soulless people, and the soulless profit
principle (available to only a tiny soulless ruling elite). Life is about
objects, things, drones, drudges, dreary jobs.
"Life is shit and then you die" is the inescapable
message. Even people are objectified and made into commodities to be bought and
sold in the market. As for science, it almost literally denies that people have
minds and free will.
Both Communism and Nazism gave people an identity. The
Nazis loved being Nazis. It filled them with purpose, meaning, pride, and a
glorious vision of the future. In today's world, Islam offers a glorious image
to its radicalised followers, and those fanatics are always those most
disillusioned with the West and what it has to offer. They are total failures
in the world of capitalist democracy and scientific materialism, so why wouldn't
they look to something else to give them hope?
The West is dying because of its cynicism, scepticism,
agnosticism, atheism, nihilism, liberalism, political correctness, scientific
materialism and capitalism - which all go together as a dreadful, despairing,
grim vision of a soulless universe devoid of any value and purpose whatsoever.
The West is nothing but a "dark Satanic mill", as Blake put it.
As Nietzsche said, we must revalue all values. We can
only beat mad religions by replacing them with better, more rational religions
... and that's exactly what Illuminism provides.
The West will fail totally unless it can regain its
spirit, and that means finding religion again, but this time Logos rather than
Forget the old Gods. Humans themselves are the new Gods
... if they did but know it!
Nietzsche said that God is dead. Well, it's time for
him to be reincarnated ... in us!
The most salient fact about the Charlie Hebdo atrocity is that not a single Islamic nation on
earth, nor any Islamic community, has its version of Charlie Hebdo. Islam has NO satire. It's a humour-free zone. You
simply can't have comedy and satire in an Islamic context ... and that's why Charlie Hebdo was wiped out. Humour
itself is offensive and Satanic to Muslims. If humour were important to them,
they would have Islamic Charlie Hebdos
... but no Muslim would dare to make jokes about Islam, and if you can't make a
joke of your own religion, you can't make a joke of anything else either.
What is the Islamic Hell? ... it's the Charlie Hebdo office! Laughter is what
you'll never hear in the Muslim heaven, and who but a humourless psycho would
want to go there?!
Ayatollah Khomeini said, "Allah did not create man so
that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the
test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every
field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no
fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious." There you
have it - straight from the horse's mouth. Islam has no clowns, but it seems to
the rest of the world that every Muslim is a clown ... or a terrorist.
"It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults
of others and to forget his own." - Cicero
have many critics who ought to study Cicero!
The God of Failure
If the people of a town that was about to be struck
by a tornado all gathered together and prayed to God to spare them - with the
effect that the tornado was miraculously diverted - one could understand why
people believed in God. Yet people are actually at their most religious when a
tornado, or whatever, has made a direct hit and large numbers of people have
died. In other words, God is rewarded for his spectacular failure to save life, and, in fact, for his equally spectacular
success in taking life!
People are perverse. With science, humanity can point
to countless great successes that it has brought about (albeit on the back of
mathematics); with religion, humanity can't point to even one success. When has
God ever accomplished anything anywhere? Anything good, that is. His failures
and crimes against humanity are, however, legion. Why is it that believers
refuse to see that they are worshipping the Devil? The Devil's greatest trick
isn't to convince you that he doesn't exist, but to make you fanatically
certain that he's God!
It's not at all surprising that the pay and bonuses
of Wall Street CEOs go up as the performance of their banks and corporations go
down. Human beings love and celebrate powerful beings who are absolutely
useless, and, in fact, extremely dangerous.
In countries such as America and Britain, income
disparities between the richest and poorest are staggeringly high. These
disparities will allow the privileged, rich elite to use their power, wealth
and influence to rule these countries indefinitely.
country should by law have a mechanism for rebasing wealth: for resetting
wealth back to the same level for everyone. This mechanism is 100% inheritance
tax. No one's wealth can extend beyond their own lifetime.
Bright by FF
"It's a representation of the Celtic goddess Brigitte (Bright). I resonate more with her, because she is more of an androgynous deity and embodies both light and darkness. It is also about the journey towards oneself. Her own shadow stands between her and and her own temple, the temple of enlightenment. Brigitte looks like she knows where she's going, but also a little bit confused, like someone unknown called her name. The shadow is partially behind her, suggesting that she is not totally aware of it. I see the shadow as the representation of the unresolved, attracting the unpredictable that delays our journey towards self-fulfillment." - FF
"Come one, come all for a role in history
To bring about a perfected meritocracy
To expel mythos religions of superstitious hokus pokus
And usher in a logos religion of mathematics and gnosis
It has been man's destiny since the beginning of time,
To explain life's mysteries through reason and rhyme
To strip the power from the evil controllers
And bring about enlightenment devoid of "holy rollers"
We are a fresh restart for a frozen resistance computed
Activists and revolutionaries, the movement rebooted
We are fighting a war for ultimate equality
A philosophical battle for a divine society
The solution is one hundred percent inheritance tax
So that the economic infrastructure shall be optimized to the max
The time is now for the second enlightenment
A time to embrace the collective God of Illumination,
Abraxas" - TB
"It is a Pallas Athene/Minerva style owl. The owl sits atop a
book which signifies knowledge, laurel branches surround it and PMCV
means Per Me Caeci Vident (Through me the blind become sighted)." - VL
Mathematics In Itself
Mathematics in itself is the absence of emotion, of
sensations, of mystical intuitions. It's pure, noumenal, ontological reason,
pure rational Form. It's the furthest thing from the human condition, hence the
most frightening and daunting thing to humans, and the thing they least
understand. Mathematics in itself is the greatest mystery of all for the feeble
human mind. You need to be a God to be good enough for math!
The Zeroth Dimension
The zero dimension is mind. Matter is the
non-zero dimension. The zero dimension is light. Broken light is the non-zero
dimension. What could be simpler? But materialists will never understand this.
"Human history becomes more and more a race between
education and catastrophe." - H. G. Wells
Rational education, not Eastern meditation, or New
Age "love", or scientific materialism, will save the world.
The Most Exclusive Club on Earth
What is the most exclusive club on Earth? No amount
of money will get you into this club, no amount of privilege, no amount of "fine
breeding", no amount of "blue blood". The right private schools and elite
colleges and universities won't help you. The right school or college tie will
avail you nothing. The right family, the right connections - they are all
useless to you. Why? Because the most exclusive club on Earth is that of human
genius, and to be a genius you must have talent so exceptional it makes you one in a billion.
Are you smart enough to move on from religion,
spiritualism and science ... to ontological mathematics? There's nowhere after
ontological mathematics. It's the end of the line.
The Hollywood Doctrine
Make 'em laugh, make 'em cry.
If it bleeds, it leads.
There's a sucker born every day.
Build it and they will come.
The bigger the better.
The same but different.
Bread and circuses.
The Society of the Spectacle.
said that children are only a couple of clicks away from hardcore porn. Well, they
are even fewer clicks away from hardcore Abrahamism, and, in fact, they get this
stuffed down their mouths at school. They get fucked up the ass with it, face
fucked and cream pied. Porn could never be more damaging than Abrahamism!
Deconstructing the Dialogue by VL
The Rich Man's Con
Capitalism = the power of private elites, the privately
Democracy = the power of the people, the Commonwealth.
Democracy was introduced in ancient Athens
precisely to overthrow rule by the private elites (oligarchs) and replace it
with public rule. What, then, are we to make of a concept such as capitalist
democracy - the only type of
democracy allowed in the modern world? In other words, what happens when you
have a system based on the combination of private and public power? Since the
private and public can't both be in charge, what you get is the reality of private power and the illusion of public power.
What is a presidential election? It's the phoniest of
all spectacles, the Grand Illusion, the occasion when the sham of people power
is most pathetically demonstrated. The common herd - the sheeple - go to the
election booths and pretend to elect their leader, and, all the while, the real leaders - the bankers, the CEOs,
the super rich ("Wall Street") - are never up for election, are never
accountable to the people, and can never be removed by the people ... except
The ancient Athenian oligarchs were overthrown because
they were publicly in charge, and
their vileness was absolutely obvious to the people. But the rich learned their
lesson. Today, in capitalist democracies, the rich oligarchs are in even
greater charge than they ever were in ancient Athens. Now, however, their rule
is not public and overt, but private and covert. They stand invisibly behind
"markets". No one can see them. No one can identify them. No one can discover
what they're up to. Like "God", the market works in "mysterious ways". Now, the
oligarchs are the puppetmasters, and the people are allowed to elect only the
Capitalist democracy is the perfect con trick, the
supreme hustle. The rich have got exactly what they desire - permanent rule.
The only price they had to pay was to make it appear as if the people were in
Capitalist democracy was how the rich oligarchs solved
the dialectic of private versus public rule. They ruled, but they pretended that the people ruled, and
that was good enough to fool the dumb masses.
The rich oligarchs have created a false consciousness
for the people - relentlessly spread and reinforced through the oligarchs'
omnipresent, 24/7 media machine.
Remember, to dupe the stupid, all you are required to
do is give them fake control, the appearance of control, but no actual control,
and you can rule them as absolutely as you ever did under monarchs, emperors,
tyrants and dictators.
Capitalist "democracies" enshrine the Dictatorship of
the Oligarchs. You know nothing about politics and economics if you haven't
worked that out.
The very first action required in any true democracy is
to ensure that the people do indeed rule, and not any hidden entity that
subverts the public good and commonwealth in favour of the private good and
private wealth. Capitalism is the exact
means by which the private elites sabotage democracy and ensure that they, and
not the people, are in charge.
All capitalist democracies have a fundamental issue to
address - the separation of capitalism and democracy - since they cannot possibly
co-exist. All right-wingers and all anarcho-capitalist libertarians call for
the State to be shrunk, preferably to no size at all, i.e. to vanish from
existence. The market, they say, should control everything. Well, there's no
need for democracy in such a system, no need for elections. The market will
decide all, and the "market" means the banks, the corporations and the super
rich, i.e. the privately wealthy.
In Ayn Rand's "utopia", the private elite rule forever,
and the people must do what the market dictates. This is a quintessential
dictatorship with only one ingredient missing. In place of a Hitler or Stalin,
you get a faceless, anonymous, inscrutable, abstract "market". Yet its power is
everywhere, controlling everything.
It must be understood that all supporters of Ayn Rand,
free-market capitalism and anarcho-capitalist libertarianism seek the abolition
of democracy and the State, and its replacement by disconnected, atomised
individuals serving the market alone.
If that's not what you want, if you wish the people to
be in charge, then you have no option but to call for the end of the rule of
private elites. That means the end of private banking (to be replaced by public
banking, run by the State), and the end of vast private corporations that openly
defy the public good and work solely for private interests (to be replaced by
public corporations serving the Commonwealth). It means the end of private,
predatory capitalism and its replacement by public, productive capitalism for
the social good.
With "social capitalism", as opposed to free-market
capitalism, the State is in charge, operating on behalf of the Commonwealth,
rather than private elites operating on behalf of themselves. All bankers and
CEOs of large corporations are therefore publicly appointed and accountable
officials. Like generals in the army, all of them can be fired by the People.
The central question of politics has never changed. Who
should rule ... the people or the private elites?
The power of the private elites can be destroyed
forever by a single tax - 100% inheritance tax. If the rich can't pass on their
wealth, the rule of the dynastically wealthy is automatically ended.
So, whose side are you on - that of the people, or of
the private elites? You can't be on both sides. You must choose once and for
all. Damned be the deed half done!
The farce of capitalist democracy must end. Either the
people must rule or the rich elites must rule without pretence. Well, which is
it to be? The Phoney War is over.
The State = the public sector, the Commonwealth, the People.
The Anti-State = the private sector, private wealth, the Rich
Which side are you on?
Who are the people who most oppose and undermine the State,
and call for it to be shrunk or abolished ? - the Rich Elite, the 1%!! Well,
are you with the 99%, or against them? Your choice.
The Capitalist Fundamentalists
DH: "An unjust income gap does exist but that is
largely due to crony capitalism and not true capitalism. I'm opposed to an
income cap or any of these measures because it is not a meritocracy. You reap
what you sow. You're going to take away somebody else's money in the form of
income cap. How is that meritocracy? And if people truly were enlightened they
wouldn't pay so much for ridiculous services and things. No amount of
government bureaucracy and management is going to stop idiotic behaviour. In
fact, more often than not, it seems to increase it. The government can't even
manage a post office and you want to give them more control? The meritocracy I
often hearing being spoken of sounds a lot like the wolf in sheep's clothing."
In 2008, capitalism died. Of course, capitalists
refuse to accept this. So, they claim that it was "crony" capitalism rather
than "true" capitalism that failed. Yet "crony capitalism" and "true
capitalism" are identical. There is no such thing as capitalism that isn't
about cronies, nepotism, privilege, cartels, inheritance, corruption,
intimidation, oligopolies and monopolies. Adam Smith, one of capitalism's
greatest champions, said, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even
for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against
the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to
prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be
consistent with liberty or justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of
the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to
facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary."
All failed ideologies never accept their failure. They
always lay the blame on some "impure", non-fundamentalist version of their
ideology, and call for renewed purity and fundamentalism. Not one "true"
capitalist has ever explained how the only form of capitalism that the world
experiences is "crony" capitalism. Who are the "true" capitalists who aren't
totally in bed with crony capitalists, and up to their neck in crony
capitalism? Can even one be identified?
Warm and Cold
The world comprises warm and cold people. Left wingers are
warm and support the public good. Right wingers are cold and support private
interest. They openly despise the Commonwealth and the Collective. Their
clearest voice is that of Ayn Rand, the deranged anti-Bolshevik atheist who
insanely claimed that selfishness is virtuous. You would need to be as insane
as she was to agree with her.
M by WS
Capitalist democracy constitutes zombie politics. The
democratic voters are zombie electors - the political undead - simply going
through the motions.
The "Big" Problem
Why are so many people so discontented with the world?
The central problem is a surprising one - scale.
The scale of things has just got too big for most people, too frightening and alienating,
too abstract and impersonal, too uncaring and callous.
Consider the history of human society, and its changing
sense of scale.
Humanity begins with individuals. Individuals get
together through friendship, lust, romance, mutual interest, common goals, and
so on. Individuals produce families, which are an extension of the individual.
Then come tribes, gangs, common interest groups, which are an extension of the
family, and then villages and towns which are an extension of tribes, and then
city states which are extensions of villages and towns. Then we have nation
states, which are extensions of city-states, and, lastly, globalism, which is
the final extension.
Human beings are designed by evolution for existence in
tribes and villages. Evolution never anticipated the internet, airplanes, cell
phones, cars, trains, ships, vast cities, and so on. How is the primitive human
mind supposed to cope? The fact is ... it doesn't. People are always trying to
recreate smaller groups, with which they can identify.
Social networking may be vast as a whole, involving
billions of people, but most people belong to networks with just a few hundred other
people. "Dunbar's Number" dictates the scale of these groups. Wikipedia says, "Dunbar's
number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can
maintain stable social relationships. These are relationships in which an individual
knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person.
This number was first proposed by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who
found a correlation between primate brain size and average social group size.
By using the average human brain size and extrapolating from the results of
primates, he proposed that humans can only comfortably maintain 150 stable relationships.
Proponents assert that numbers larger than this generally require more
restrictive rules, laws, and enforced norms to maintain a stable, cohesive
group. It has been proposed to lie between 100 and 250, with a commonly used
value of 150. Dunbar's number states the number of people one knows and keeps
social contact with, and it does not include the number of people known
personally with a ceased social relationship, nor people just generally known
with a lack of persistent social relationship, a number which might be much
higher and likely depends on long-term memory size.
"Dunbar theorized that 'this limit is a direct function
of relative neocortex size, and that this in turn limits group size ... the
limit imposed by neocortical processing capacity is simply on the number of
individuals with whom a stable inter-personal relationship can be maintained.'
On the periphery, the number also includes past colleagues, such as high school
friends, with whom a person would want to reacquaint themself if they met
Human happiness revolves around Dunbar's Number, and
not the seven billion people (and growing!) that comprise the total population
of the world.
People divide themselves into family units, teams,
societies, clubs, gangs, tribes, and so on, on a scale compatible with Dunbar's
number. Millions and billions don't come into it in any practical way.
A happy world is a world of appropriate scale, and that's
what the human race has lost. We are constantly told that bigger is better rather
than small is beautiful. Who's saying this? Well, the globalists - the capitalists
- who want to sell their products everywhere, and thus be as rich, powerful and
influential as possible. Yet, even the globalists are a small gang. They like
to keep their wealth, power and influence in the family - via inheritance - and
amongst their networks of friends and cronies, people who all swim in the same
cultural pool of privilege. They don't want any scumbag outsiders crashing the
party. So, they are globalists in only one sense - money and power - yet they
are Dunbar localists in every other way, keeping everything within a small,
known group of trusted and loyal confederates (fellow conspirators!).
The globalists have done something astonishing without
anyone noticing. They have taken control of the nation states and made them
their puppets. All nation states now dance to the globalist tune. When nation states
elect new governments, the new kids on the block are immediately locked into a
system where they have to obey banks, corporations, markets and privileged elites,
i.e. external, unelected, unaccountable forces that are far more powerful than
any nation state, and to which no nation state can stand up. No matter what kind
of government anyone in any nation state elects, they will always be ruled by
the globalists, and not those for whom they actually voted. That is the secret
of "capitalist democracy". The people vote for democracy (people power) but get
global capitalism (the power of private elites and oligarchies). There's no
such thing as true democracy in a globalist, capitalist world.
The nation state has died without anyone noticing. All
nation states are now imprisoned in a global system over which they have no
power. To challenge global power, all nation states would have to act together
against the global elite, but since the global elite are the ones who give you
your "democratic" leaders, that's never going to happen. The three most
powerful "democrats" in Britain are David Cameron (Prime Minister), George
Osborne (Chancellor) and Boris Johnson (Mayor of London). All three were
members of the elite, exclusive, ultra-privileged Bullingdon Club at Oxford
Cameron and Johnson both went to Eton College, the most
elite private school in the world. Osborne went to St Paul's, number 3 most
elite private school in the world. Nick Clegg, Britain's deputy prime minister
went to Westminster (No. 2 elite private school in the world) and Cambridge
University. Ed Miliband, Leader of the Opposition in Britain, went to Oxford
University. Ed Miliband, Ed Balls (shadow Chancellor) and David Cameron all
studied the same degree (PPE: philosophy, politics and economics) at Oxford
How dumb do you have to be to think that there is any
democracy at all in a country ruled by these people? The whole thing is rigged
from the outset. It's a private club, and it's getting worse and worse as more
money, power and influence is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands via
globalism, privilege, cronyism, nepotism, inheritance and dynastic marriage.
What's the cure? It's time to smash the nation state
and thus globalism. The only globalism that could ever be accepted is the
meritocratic New World Order envisaged in Star
We must replace the nation state with an earlier form: the
city-state (of about a million people), or a small nation (of about five
million people, as in Scotland).
Dunbar's Number and Dogs
Such is the perversity of the human condition that
people with dogs value them more than human strangers. Dogs count as part of
people's Dunbar Number - their closest acquaintances.
In history, war and revolution killed off local
elites. Local elites were seeable and killable. But how do you defeat an
unseen, far distant, global elite? How do you defeat an abstract "market"?
To stop Scotland from breaking away from the UK, the UK
government launched "Project Fear", designed to terrify the Scottish electorate
into voting to stay within the Union. The Bank of England warned of dire
financial consequences if Scotland voted for independence. Several large
corporations said they would leave the country, costing many thousands of jobs.
Supermarkets said prices would rise steeply. Market analysts claimed the
Scottish economy would collapse. And so on. Who elected any of these doom
mongers? In what way were any of them accountable to the Scottish people? Why
were these capitalists allowed to interfere in the vote of the Scottish People?
This, of course, proves that there's no such thing as democracy. At any time,
the "free" people can be threatened by capitalists and forced to do the bidding
of the capitalists. It's plainly not the people who are in charge, but the
capitalists. How can that be allowed to continue?
Nothing could have been more daunting and terrifying
than the enormous English army that faced the tiny Scottish force at
Bannockburn in 1314, yet the Scots won the field. That's what happens when an
ingenious, meritocratic, brave people dares to be free, to have the highest
hopes and ambitions, and will let nothing stop it.
They get everything and you get nothing. How long will you tolerate it?
The Beautiful World
"Bigger is Better" versus "Small is Beautiful"
Global capitalism is all about the former, social capitalism
about the latter. We have to smash international, globalist banks, and enormous
multinational corporations. Every entity that can dictate to the State must be
abolished. No private entity should be "too big to fail". Every entity that can
dictate to the people without being accountable to the people must be
abolished. Everything must be on a local scale, capitalism above all. "Social
capitalism" means small, localist capitalism. It's all about small businesses
and enterprises, not about vast leviathans that have higher incomes than nation
Are you one of the people who wants to fade into the
background, to be anonymous, to be part of the crowd, to never influence this
world you live in? Do you want global banks and corporations to tell you how to
lead your life? No? Well do something about it! Stop supporting the farce of
capitalist democracy. It's the inversion of true democracy, as any ancient
Athenian could have told you. Democracy was designed to control the private
elites and bring them under public power. Capitalist democracy is designed to
control the public and bring them under private power, while at the same time
pretending that the people are in charge.
Inspired by the Scottish Independence Referendum, a quarter
of Americans were reported to want their states to secede from the USA. This is
the future. All lumbering, giant states will collapse under their own
contradictions. The world can and must return to a sensible political scale,
where the local people are truly in charge of their local environment, as they
were in ancient Athens, where all citizens were expected to be active citizens,
directly involved in the governance of their city-state.
The Democratic Deficit
The modern Western world purports to be all about
choice, self-expression, individualism, personal liberty, freedom from oppression,
and so on. However, this ideology is fundamentally at odds with another central
pillar of the Western World, namely democracy. Democracy says that you can
freely choose to vote for whomever you like. So far, so good. However, it then
makes a crucial second statement: if you are outvoted, you can get things you
definitely didn't vote for, things
you might even despise.
Imagine wanting an Apple Smartphone and then being
forced to take a Samsung Smartphone because of a vote, or wanting to see movie
X and being forced to watch movie Y because you got outvoted. You are
emphatically not getting what you chose. You do not feel free.
"Capitalist Democracy" is generating more and more cognitive
dissonance in people. It's making them frustrated and angry. In all consumerist
aspects of life, people get what they want, what they pay for. But this does
not apply to the political regimes that rule them. You can easily get the
opposite of what you want and what you voted for.
It's increasingly obvious that people will no longer accept
this. They're used to getting their own way, and politics can no longer deliver.
Anarcho-capitalist libertarians want to do away with democratic government,
leaving nothing but capitalist free markets and consumerism. This is entirely
logical for fanatical capitalists. But what about people who hate capitalism and
its "ethics" of total selfishness, greed and materialism?
The world now has to accept that democracy has failed.
Democracy can't give all of the people what they want. It can only give those who
won the election what they want, and even they are served imperfectly. No Democrat,
for example, could honestly rate what Obama has done for America, despite his
impeccable Democratic credentials. We must now look to a future of post-democratic
politics where people get what they want rather than what they didn't vote for.
We need a grand alliance of everyone to think about how we can all get what we want without
enslaving others. The only way to do this is through breaking up nation states
into states and city-states, each with a particular identity that everyone in
that small state or city-state chooses and agrees with. In the future, we will
all choose exactly what political regime we live under. Let's make it happen!
Zygmunt Bauman summarised the paradox of our era as: "Never
have we been so free. Never have we felt so powerless."
In democracies, we are asked to vote for the least
worst party, the least worst candidate, the least worst option. What kind of
system is that? If you're not voting for the best, you shouldn't want to vote
"The idea that voting is pointless, democracy a
façade, and that no one is representing ordinary people is more resonant than
ever as I leave my ordinary town behind. Amidst the guilt and anger I feel in
the back of the Führer-mobile, there is hope. Whilst it's clear that on an
individual, communal, and global level that radical change is necessary, I feel
a powerful, transcendent optimism. I know change is possible, I know there is
an alternative, because I live a completely different life to the one I was
born with. I also know that the solution is not fame or money or any transient
adornment of the individual. The only Revolution that can really change the
world is the one in your own consciousness, and mine has already begun." -
Votes are placebos. They are designed to make
voters feel good, to give them a psychological boost. But they have no active
Value honour and glory over money and possessions.
Stop complaining, stop being lazy. Get active. Change things. Make an impact on
the world. Live a life that others will admire.
In the UK general election of 2005, the turnout was
61.36%, i.e. nearly 40% of eligible voters declined to participate. The
victorious Labour Party received 62.4% of the seats in the House of Commons.
The total vote they received of all those eligible to vote was a mere 24.2%. So
a political party that represented less than a quarter of the electorate gained
a massive parliamentary majority. In what way does that constitute "democracy"?
If seventy-five percent of the electorate are forced to endure policies they
didn't vote for, and to which they gave no mandate, isn't that a dictatorship
rather than a democracy?
What a Beautiful World
"Think about the world you live in. Think of beautiful,
sweet, rustic-smelling forests, and sparkling rivers, dancing against the
boulders they rush over. Think of little swirling seashells, and plants that are growing in
fractals - how mathematically elegant they are! Think of music that inspires
you; music whose vibrations resonate with your own, whose composition and lyrics
elevate your soul. Think of awe-inspiring art that draws you in and makes you a
small part of it. Think of a warm smile of your loved one, and their eyes that
radiate love. Think of a historical figure, a hero, whose bravery and
sacrifice for others motivates you to get out of your comfort zone. We live in
a fascinating world and you can recognize beauty everywhere around you by
merely opening up your eyes.
"Unfortunately, this beauty is being overshadowed by
ignorance. Instead of embracing and actively fighting to protect the beauty
around them, the majority of people drift through life, without much thought, absorbing
what is being fed to them through the mainstream media. They don't have opinions
of their own, and most of the time they don't even have independent thoughts. Eventually
they become so mired in this cheap, fast produced culture, which caters to the
lowest common denominator, that they can no longer tell apart quality and beauty
from primitive entertainment and madness.
"The majority of world's population is very far from
fulfilling their potential. Instead, they are ignorant of their true purpose in
life due to various distractions: boss overloading them with work, spouse is
not happy that they spend so little time together, kids misbehaving, their car
needs repair again - the list is endless. This is where The Movement steps in.
The Movement recognizes that to improve the world we live in, first we need to
help improve individual lives around us. That means we need to educate those
who are ready and willing to listen and learn, so that they can finally take
charge of their lives and positively contribute to society. Remember that no
man or woman can improve their lives unless they are determined to do so
themselves. You cannot force improvement upon them; they have to consciously
work towards that goal.
"There are many separate groups working within the
Movement. There are small cells and sole individuals working on projects to
help spread the knowledge and the values of Meritocracy. I work in a small cell,
in which we are dedicated to exposing the socially, economically, politically
and psychologically detrimental ways of the Old World Order (OWO) and to
promoting knowledge and thought. Our goal is, through education, to plant the
seeds of revolution in peoples' hearts and to lead them in the united front of
Meritocracy, Round-Table psychology and Illuminism. We aim to outsmart the OWO
by introducing ideas that will make their systems obsolete. As Buckminster
Fuller said, 'You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To
change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.'
"All members of the said cell are expected to possess
the virtues of a great leader:
Devotion - to our cause and fellow team members.
Courage - to challenge status quo, and to be free and
Resourcefulness - to find quick and clever ways to overcome
Ambition - determination and motivation to work hard in order
to achieve our goals.
Temperance - abstinence from things that impair our physical,
mental or spiritual health.
Fortitude - strength in the face of adversity.
Justice - just behaviour and treatment of others.
Prudence - carefulness and thoughtfulness for the future.
Devotion - to our cause and fellow team members.
"The cell that I work with is just one of the
groups that adopted the Movement ideas as described in this website. If you don't
think you are a good match for us, but you still want to contribute to the
Movement, you can either join another such organization, work solo, or
establish a new Movement group. If you choose the latter, please first make
sure that you understand well what Meritocracy stands for, and have read
extensively on the subject, including its antithesis: democracy/dumbocracy and
free market capitalism (crapitalism). If you are currently a member of a group that just
debates various questions, plans various campaigns, jumping from one idea to
the other, never producing or achieving anything - leave it! You are just
wasting your time there.
"If you choose to work by yourself or gather a small
group and work with them, remember that it is much better to have a small goal,
work towards it and achieve it, rather than have a big goal (or many goals), start
working on it, then lose interest and consequently fail. In order to achieve
any major goal you'll have to complete a series of tasks and projects anyway.
So start by picking one task of one small project, stick to it, and follow
through to completion. The worst thing you can do is pick one project, then
drop it, then pick another, then another and another. A year after, you would
have wasted this whole time and achieved absolutely nothing! (Note that setting
up a Facebook group with 600, or however many members, by itself is not an
achievement, unless you have produced something that had an impact outside of
your group). Instead, you could have spent your time more wisely if you had
read a good book or two - educating yourself about current affairs, philosophy,
history, psychology, etc. If you don't think that you'll be able to stick to a
project and complete it, then you should spend your time reading and educating
yourself about serious matters. Actually, a lot of people within The Movement
circles want to contribute and help, but they don't know where to start, so
they seek guidance. To them I say: you can make a tremendous contribution just
by reading serious books and educating yourselves. There are many
culturally-priceless books discussed and mentioned on the AC site. The Movement's
goal is to have an educated, enlightened world, so it is always best to start
with yourself. 'Be the change you want to see in the world,' said Mahatma
"Do whatever gets you fired up. And don't just go half
way - give it your all!" - NK
"Why is it important to take down the British
Royal family? Before the United States, the British Empire was the World's
Superpower. The British Royal family is what's left of it. This family is a
worldwide symbol of all the evils of today's world, including: inequality,
excessive wealth, privilege, masters ruling over slaves (the people of the UK
aren't citizens but "subjects"), 'the good Christian family', mediocrity (no talent),
the list goes on. By demolishing this family we can start a new wave of change.
It can be just as electrifying as the American and French Revolutions. Most
British people have a lot of respect for the Queen… don't ask me why... but they
hate prince Charles, who is first in the line after the Queen dies. This will represent
a great opportunity to abolish the monarchy." - NK
The "Old" Obstacle
"As children under the age of 18 (in some countries
under 16) are not allowed to vote due to their lack of knowledge and
experience, so should retired people lose their right to vote on the account
that they gave up their responsibilities as citizens - they stopped working,
hence stopped contributing to the society. Why should people, that are
literally waiting to die, be allowed to make decisions that will adversely
impact the younger generations, but will make little difference to those same
pensioners in the little time they have left? You might say: because pensioners
have extensive life experience. That might be so, but in general, after people
retire, they become detached from the newest trends and the zeitgeist (spirit
of the day). Only the elderly who continue working and thus contributing to the
society should be allowed to vote.
"Consider the Scottish Referendum. Nearly three
quarters (73%) of those aged 65 or over voted 'No' (not to separate), 59% of
those aged between 25 and 34 voted 'Yes' (to separate) and 71% of those aged 16
or 17 also voted 'Yes'. Considering that 17.4% of Scottish population are 65
and over, if pensioners were not allowed to vote, we are likely to have had a
free, independent Scotland right now. [Figures taken from the Lord Ashcroft
Polls on Scottish Independence].
"The problem with retired people is that they are incredibly
risk averse and progress averse. They are scared of change, because they are
incapable of adapting to it. Evolution, with few exceptions, guarantees it.
Timothy Leary suggests that throughout their lifetimes people were able to
activate several brain circuits, but once they reached 40 the great majority of
them stayed at the same level for the rest of their lives. The older they get,
the more they cling to the 'good old good ways', because that's what they know
best. If they were to accept progress, it would mean that they could no longer
sustain their comfy power-positions that most of them are in now.
"Once pensioners are no longer be allowed to halt
progress, society will start advancing at an incredible rate. New advanced, rational
laws will start being passed. Even the legislative system will become more
transparent - making it work for the wider population, not just a few fat cats
who protect their dirty, cash-cow businesses." - NK
MH: It's true that people over 40 have a
disturbing tendency to become set in their ways, and to turn into reactionary
conservatives, following an obstructive right-wing agenda. They become obsessed
with inheritance ... with passing on their wealth to their children, and fuck
everyone else. The old are those most fanatically opposed to 100% inheritance
tax, hence are the biggest obstacle to a meritocratic society of equal
opportunities. Their experience, such as it is, has usually become obsolete and
irrelevant. The changing world has passed them by. Would the "experience" of old
men and women from the Stone Age count for anything in today's world?
Experience is not something by which you should set
much store. Reason, intelligence, knowledge, will, drive, ambition and
adaptability are enormously more important. You have to be able to change and
move with the times.
The function of the State should not only be to
optimise the under 40s, but also the over 40s, to keep their minds fresh,
active, adaptable, still capable of learning and growing. We don't want over
40s to become dinosaurs and fossils. You should be bright and active until the
day you die. People in great jobs, jobs they love, don't want to retire.
Retirement is a rehearsal for death.
"The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine
that age brings wisdom." - H.L. Mencken
Age has the unfortunate tendency to turn people into old
fools, prattling on about their redundant "experience" as if it counts for
"With age comes wisdom, but sometimes age comes alone." -
The old are rarely wise. They're usually just old.
The only elderly people you should listen to are those who are young at heart,
who are still full of energy, with flexible minds, capable of learning new
things. People like that actually learn from their experiences, and keep
learning, and can pass on genuine wisdom.
"You have to push as hard as the age that pushes against
you." - Flannery O'Connor
"I don't believe one grows older. I think that what
happens early on in life is that at a certain age one stands still and
stagnates." - T. S. Eliot
"Old men ought to be explorers." - T. S. Eliot
"As we grow older, the world becomes stranger." - T. S. Eliot
"Where is the Life we have lost in living?" - T. S. Eliot
"Do not let me hear
Of the wisdom of old men, but rather of their folly,
Their fear of fear and frenzy, their fear of possession,
Of belonging to another, or to others, or to God.
The only wisdom we can hope to acquire
Is the wisdom of humility: humility is endless." - T. S.
"O dark dark dark. They all go into the dark,
The vacant interstellar spaces, the vacant into the vacant,
And we all go with them, into the silent funeral,
Nobody's funeral, for there is no one to bury." - T. S. Eliot
"You say I am repeating
Something I have said before. I shall say it again.
Shall I say it again?" - T. S. Eliot
"There are no two words in the English language more harmful than 'good job'." - Whiplash
"It's surprising how many people from The Movement
circles are incapable of receiving, or constructing and voicing, criticism. Providing
and welcoming criticism is incredibly important - it's the antithesis stage of
the dialectic. Without it, there would be no real progress, since there are few,
if any, individuals who are capable of critically assessing their work and
"It is clear that majority of people from the West,
particularly from the US and the UK, are very cautious when providing feedback
for fear of hurting people's feelings. This creates a culture where being
social (friendly) is more important than being honest and true to yourself. In
this culture, people are not used to receiving serious, constructive criticism;
hence they delude themselves that their first attempt is always good enough.
This culture breeds mediocrity: it fosters wimpy softies, it sometimes even
breeds pathetic, sensitive egomaniacs who are incapable of accepting that they
were wrong, or that their work is not as good as they thought. What is worse,
once they receive any negative word - they take it personally!
"Then they either ignore your comments and avoid
interacting with you, or they give up completely. These people need to open
themselves up to criticism and learn to rationally analyze this feedback and
integrate it in their self-growth.
"When someone seriously criticizes you, rationally
assess their criticism, consider whether the criticism has basis - if it's
rational. Emotional criticism is nearly always subjective and therefore
insignificant. On the other hand, rational criticism is like a map that can
lead you to a treasure island. When assessing and analyzing criticism, it is
important to consider the critic, as they might not have the expertise or the
insight to provide you with an accurate picture. Just as some maps are more
accurate than others, so some feedbacks are more helpful than others.
"If you view criticism rationally and not emotionally,
there is no reason why you should feel bad when being criticized. Welcoming criticism
is the best way forward for self-improvement. By ignoring any critical remarks
addressed your way, you halt your development. Each of us perceives the world
differently - we live in our own island realities. If you ask people around
you, and they give you their honest opinion, nearly always their opinion of you
differs from your own. This is why criticism is so vital. Often we overlook our
weaknesses, or we just don't have a good standard of comparison.
"When people that are close to you give their honest
feedback, they help you build a better picture of where you stand in relation to
others. Criticism is like an immaterial reflection in a mirror that you wouldn't
be able to see without someone's help. This is precious information, and if
used appropriately, can help you transform yourself from base metal to gold."
"Linus Torvalds said, 'Don't ever make the mistake [of
thinking] that you can design something better than what you get from ruthless
massively parallel trial-and-error with a feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence
much too much credit.' What Torvalds describes is nothing other than
dialectical evolution. That's why the dialectic has to be built into all aspects
of society. Criticism is a necessary part of the dialectic, and essential for
growth (as opposed to self-delusion)." - NK
MH: The West is an "other-directed" society where
people look to get on well with their peers ("others"), to be in accord with
them and agreeable to them. The thing they fear most is to be cast out from the
social group. This means that many people go out of their way not to offend
others, and this means that they don't criticise shoddy work, and instead praise
it, thus giving a false impression of its quality and worth. This inevitably leads
to a mediocre and even substandard world, a dumbed-down world rapidly racing to
the bottom, not the top, in terms of quality. Crap is hailed as "genius"!
People start to think they are much smarter and better than they actually are.
They become totally self-deluded. Many Facebook trolls believe themselves geniuses,
and others are too polite to tell that they are retarded and should fuck off
back to the jungle and the caves where all the savages live.
On "Bless you"
Quite a few people emailed me ending their messages
with the line: 'May Abraxas bless you.' I know it was well-intended, but, seriously,
what were you thinking? What happened to the Nietzsche's call for revaluation
of all religious and moral values?
"I have a divine spark and therefore I am already blessed,
just like everyone else. I don't need anyone, not even the Universal Consciousness,
to bless me. If I fail in my quest it is my fault alone (which I will take the
responsibility for) and it's not because my efforts weren't blessed.
"This notion of having to be blessed comes from an
infantile desire to be protected by a stronger, fatherly figure. It's just as
bad as hoping for the Abrahamic 'God' to deliver justice. Screw that! If you
feel you need to be smothered with attention - go get laid. Maybe that will
help to set you free from this childish fantasy.
"And why would Abraxas care to bless anyone anyway? Isn't
our mission in this life is to learn? Wouldn't we learn better from our
failures? As the Dialectic unfolds we will get our chance to succeed, not
because we were specifically blessed for that task, but because we were ready.
We learned everything we could from our previous failures and finally we were
able to successfully apply all that knowledge.
"We should go so far as to completely eradicate 'bless
you' from our vocabularies. National Geographic reports that it was during the
plague of CE 590 when 'Pope Gregory I ordered unceasing prayer for divine
intercession. Part of his command was that anyone sneezing be blessed
immediately ("God bless you"), since sneezing was often the first sign that someone
was falling ill with the plague.' In this day and age, when religious
superstition is rightly regarded as absurd, a more appropriate response to a
sneeze would be 'to your health', or 'be healthy'.
"Be wary of all these religious customs that even non-believers
take for granted. Most of the them insidiously make you a weaker, meeker
person." - NK
MH: The Movement isn't a hippie movement. It's
not New Age. It's not about peace, love, forgiveness, and turning the other
cheek. It's not about faith. It isn't "spiritual" if spiritual means sitting
under a tree meditating and chanting "om". It's not about the "love and light"
brigade. It's much closer to Nietzsche than Buddha, and Nietzsche wasn't any
kind of liberal. He was an extremist radical.
We don't want you to "like" us. We don't crave your
approval. We want you to be strong, smart, trustworthy, honourable, noble,
bold, resourceful brave ... as all knights should be that seek the Grail.
We simply aren't interested in the weak and the meek, those
searching for something to fill the vacuum in their empty heads. We're
interested in the Coming Race of superwomen and supermen, not in the bland,
banal masses blabbering on about peace and love and some God substitute.
We want people who are committed to quality. As Robert
M. Pirsig said, "Care and Quality are internal and external aspects of the same
thing. A person who sees Quality and feels it as he works is a person who
cares. A person who cares about what he sees and does is a person who's bound
to have some characteristic of quality. ... Art is anything you can do well.
Anything you can do with Quality."
Abraxas is defined as the first being to become
God. Our task is to emulate him, not to worship him. Our task is to achieve the
same Quality that he did.
Narcissus: the Self-Admirer
"In 1898 Havelock Ellis, an English sexologist, used the term
'narcissus-like' in reference to excessive masturbation, whereby the person
becomes his or her own sex object." - Wikipedia
"In 1923, Martin Buber published an essay 'Ich und Du' (I and
You), in which he pointed out that our narcissism often leads us to relate to
others as objects instead of as equals." - Wikipedia
"Since 2000, on psychological tests designed to detect
narcissism, the scores of residents of the United States have continually increased.
Psychologists have suggested a link to social networking. Hotchkiss identified
what she called the seven deadly sins of narcissism:
Shame is the feeling that lurks beneath all unhealthy narcissism, and the
inability to process shame in healthy ways.
2. Magical thinking:
Narcissists see themselves as perfect, using distortion and illusion known as
magical thinking. They also use projection to dump shame onto others.
3. Arrogance: A
narcissist who is feeling deflated may reinflate by diminishing, debasing, or
degrading somebody else.
4. Envy: A
narcissist may secure a sense of superiority in the face of another person's
ability by using contempt to minimize the other person.
Narcissists hold unreasonable expectations of particularly favourable treatment
and automatic compliance because they consider themselves special. Failure to
comply is considered an attack on their superiority, and the perpetrator is considered
an 'awkward' or 'difficult' person. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic
injury that can trigger narcissistic rage.
Can take many forms but always involves the exploitation of others without
regard for their feelings or interests. Often the other is in a subservient position
where resistance would be difficult or even impossible. Sometimes the subservience
is not so much real as assumed.
7. Bad boundaries:
Narcissists do not recognize that they have boundaries and that others are separate
and are not extensions of themselves. Others either exist to meet their needs
or may as well not exist at all. Those who provide narcissistic supply to the
narcissist are treated as if they are part of the narcissist and are expected
to live up to those expectations. In the mind of a narcissist, there is no boundary
between self and other. Although most individuals have some narcissistic
traits, high levels of narcissism can manifest themselves in a pathological
form as narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), whereby the patient
overestimates his or her abilities and has an excessive need for admiration and
affirmation." - Wikipedia
"Campbell and Foster (2007) review the literature on
narcissism. They argue that narcissists possess the following 'basic
Narcissists think they are better than others.
Narcissists' views tend to be contrary to reality. In measures that compare
self-report to objective measures, narcissists' self-views tend to be greatly
Narcissists' views tend to be most exaggerated in the agentic domain, relative
to the communion domain.
Narcissists perceive themselves to be unique and special people.
upon narcissists' behaviour in resource dilemmas supports the case for
narcissists as being selfish.
Oriented toward success:
Narcissists are oriented towards success by being, for example, approach oriented."
"Narcissistic supply is a concept introduced into
psychoanalytic theory by Otto Fenichel in 1938, to describe a type of admiration,
interpersonal support or sustenance drawn by an individual from his or her
environment and essential to their self-esteem.
"The term is typically used in a negative sense,
describing a pathological or excessive need for attention or admiration in
codependents and the orally fixated, that does not take into account the
feelings, opinions or preferences of other people." - Wikipedia
"Narcissistic rage is a reaction to narcissistic
injury, which is a perceived threat to a narcissist's self-esteem or
self-worth. Narcissistic injury (or narcissistic scar) is a phrase used by
Sigmund Freud in the 1920s; narcissistic wound and narcissistic blow are
further, almost interchangeable terms. The term narcissistic rage was coined by
Heinz Kohut in 1972.
"Narcissistic rage occurs on a continuum from instances
of aloofness, and expression of mild irritation or annoyance, to serious
outbursts, including violent attacks. Narcissistic rage reactions are not
limited to personality disorders and may be also seen in catatonic, paranoid
delusion and depressive episodes. It has also been suggested that narcissists
have two layers of rage. The first layer of rage can be thought of as a
constant anger (towards someone else), with the second layer being a self-aimed
wrath." - Wikipedia
"Aggressive narcissism - This is Factor 1 in the Hare
Psychopathy Checklist, which includes the following traits:
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Cunning/manipulative." - Wikipedia
"Collective narcissism (or group narcissism) is a type of
narcissism where an individual has an inflated self-love of his or her own
ingroup, where an 'ingroup' is a group in which an individual is personally involved.
While the classic definition of narcissism focuses on the individual, collective
narcissism asserts that one can have a similar excessively high opinion of a
group, and that a group can function as a narcissistic entity. Collective
narcissism is related to ethnocentrism; however, ethnocentrism primarily focuses
on self-centeredness at an ethnic or cultural level, while collective narcissism
is extended to any type of ingroup beyond just cultures and ethnicities." -
Right-wingers, free-market capitalists, anarcho-capitalist
libertarians, Randroids and religious fundamentalists are all on the
narcissistic spectrum. The financial meltdown of 2008 was caused by the
psychopathic narcissists of the banking sector.
Our world is controlled by narcissists, psychopaths,
sociopaths, egotists, Id-iots, hawks and predators.
How does the rest of humanity curb and control these
monsters in its midst? How does it actively prevent these people from acquiring
wealth, power and influence?
The monsters are the right wingers who promote the
private good over the public good. All decent human beings are inherently left
wing and want a fair, just world in which everyone, from whatever background,
gets a fair crack of the whip, a proper chance to make the most of themselves,
and rise as high as their talents deserve.
Democracy = no values, no quality, no excellence, no
identity, no engagement, no positive liberty, no vision.
Democracy = rule by a failed, out of touch elite.
What is the real face beneath the democratic mask? What are
the people behind the masks hiding?
"In the military they give medals to those who sacrifice
themselves so others may gain. In business, we give bonuses to those who sacrifice
others so we may gain. We have it backward." - Simon Sinek
No, you have it in exactly the manner required by
"Ye are many - they are few." - Shelley
Are you the No Men of No Man's Land?
"Liberty is not the power of doing what we like, but
the right to do what we ought." - Lord Acton
Right wing people are driven by their Id and are
concerned with doing what they like (regardless of others). Left wing people
are driven by their Superego, and are concerned with doing what is right (being
fair and just to others). Right wingers have no interest in any kind of equality,
and constantly rail against it. Left wingers want equality to apply wherever
possible and wherever sensible.
We need an auto-immune system for the human race
- one that recognises the harmful humans in its midst and attacks and
eradicates them. We need retaliators who seek out the hawks that prey on the
doves, and get rid of them.
The Illuminati are not aliens or capitalists or communists
... they are the enlightened ones.
Capitalist globalism leads to people feeling more and
more powerless. They can't see whose ruling them. They can't see how to
influence or affect or change the minds of those ruling them. They can't vote
them out. They can't fire them. They don't even know who to rebel or revolt
against. How can you hold a revolution against the "market"?
Power must come much closer to the people. It must be
local, not global. Everyone must see exactly who is ruling them, and know
exactly how to get rid of them if they're doing a bad job.
People need to reclaim their political identity, and
that means they must become active rather than passive citizens. We need a
rebirth of the values of ancient Athens where citizens who did not take part in
the active governance of their own society were known as "idiots". Idiot originally
meant "private person", i.e. a person who cut himself off from the public
arena, hence knew nothing about what was going on, hence was an ignoramus.
Today, the vast majority of democratic voters are idiots. They think that
casting a meaningless vote every few years makes them an engaged citizen.
People's identity is invested in their family,
religion, community, nationality, race, sexuality, career and so on. The
primary source of your identity should be the political system in which you
live - since that's the thing that ultimately defines your life.
Children always want fun. Adults want fun more and
more too, hence adults are becoming infantilised. The world increasingly seems
to comprise people who are permanent children, people who never grow up. This
is a Peter Pan world.
Sure, there is a time for fun, but there's also a time
for hard work, sweat, difficulty, hardships, trials, quests ... for slaying
Capitalism is an infantilising economic system. It
wants you to be a permanent kid in a permanent candy store, always buying
whatever takes your fancy.
The eyes of fear see danger everywhere. The eyes of confidence
see opportunity everywhere. The demons of fear say you are not good enough. The
angels of confidence say you can do anything to which you apply yourself.
The received history, the received wisdom, the received
narrative, the received way of doing things ... all human progress is brought
about by those who reject what they "receive".
Are you stuck? Well, what are you doing to get
unstuck? Do you have no real prospects? Well, what are you doing to create
prospects for yourself? Are you helpless, are you hopeless, are you trapped?
Are you lonely and unhappy? Are you passive and apathetic? Are you ruled by fear?
Do you stay in bad relationships because you're terrified of being on your own?
Well, what are you doing about it?
"Why do people stay together for so long in bad
relationships? They eat so much shit for so long, they don't even recognise the
taste of it after a while." - As Cool As
Have you ceased to recognise the taste of the shit you're
being forced to eat?
NO SAFETY NET
WILLING TO GO TO THE POINT OF NO RETURN
Ultimately, people eat shit because they want to. They are
scared not to. They are scared of doing whatever it takes to stop eating shit.
War and Peace
"I don't know what will happen and don't want to
know, and can't, but if I want this - want glory, want to be known to men, want
to be loved by them, it is not my fault that I want it and want nothing but
that and live only for that. Yes, for that alone! I shall never tell anyone,
but, dear Lord! what am I to do if I love nothing but fame and men's esteem? I
know that tomorrow I may be killed, but tomorrow I may also be able to show of
what I am capable. Death, wounds, the loss of family - nothing frightens me.
However much I love my father, my sister, my wife, I would give it all for one
a moment of glory, a moment of triumph in front of men, of love from men I
don't know and never shall know, for the love of these men here [the military
leadership]." - Prince Andrei Bolkonsky (Tolstoy's War and Peace)
Well, are you going to leave your mark on the world, or be
just another bystander, another understudy, another also-ran? It's your choice.
"Democratic" politicians are in charge but not in control. To
be more accurate, they appear to be in charge, and, in a world of appearances,
a world of people always faking it, that's sufficient. The purpose of
democratic politicians is to play the part of ruling in the name of the people,
while the elite puppetmasters get on with ruling in their own name and own
Power, not Reason, is in control.
Money, not intelligence, is in control.
Humanity worships power and money, not reason and
intelligence. Humanity's values need to be entirely revalued. That can happen
only when the myths that humanity lives by are entirely rewritten.
Zombie parliaments, zombie religions, zombie nations, zombie
people. Where are the living? Wherever you look, you can see only the undead.
The name for a leaderless samurai is a ronin. A ronin is a drifter, a "gun for hire", an itinerant
mercenary soldier. He has no master. He has been cast adrift from his former
way of life. Ronin means "wave man" -
a man metaphorically at sea, with no port, no home, no roots. His only sellable
skill is killing people. For a samurai, losing your Lord led to a catastrophic
loss of status - which is why these elite killers fought to the death for their
Always be moving forward!
Guilt ... the eternal watcher. The watcher that never sleeps.
As far as average people are concerned, Logos can
never engage them emotionally, hence can never satisfy and comfort them. Joseph
Campbell is right that humanity needs
myths to live by. The task is to find the best myths, the ones that optimise
humanity rather than degrade it. The myths of mainstream religion are
enormously damaging to the human psyche and human progress.
The Fivefold Way
Everyone is offered the Fivefold Way, i.e. a choice
of five paths for understanding the true nature of existence, only one of which
actually leads to the Truth:
Path 1) Organised Religion - totally false. Mythos nonsense.
Path 2) New Age Spirituality - totally false. Mythos
Path 3) Scientific Materialism - a sensory Mythos, and
excellent at modelling the sensory world of appearances - and totally useless
at everything else. Utterly false regarding its claims about ultimate reality.
Path 4) Philosophy - a thinking Mythos. A Grand Philosophy,
such as that of Schopenhauer, presents an all-encompassing, ingenious
explanation of reality, yet lacks observational evidence such as science can
provide, or rational proof, such as mathematics can provide.
Path 5) Ontological mathematics. If the universe is rational,
which it is, then only a purely rational system can capture its Truths. That
system is ontological mathematics.
Some people imagine that the universe isn't rational. To contemplate that
issue, first remove all animals from existence, especially humans. Do planets
orbiting stars make errors? Do suns make errors in their production of energy?
Do galaxies commit mistakes? Error is associated with subjective opinions and
beliefs about the operations of the universe, but the operations of the
universe are themselves flawless and perfect, reflecting absolute mathematical
precision. How can that mathematical precision be explained if mathematics is
not the answer to the fundamental nature of existence? What can offer
mathematical precision that is not
mathematics? How can anything be like
mathematics, yet not be mathematics?
Mathematics has no imitators.
How does error enter a mathematical universe? It's very
simple. It enters through perfect mathematical basis notes - sinusoidal waves -
being put together badly. An expert playing the piano can produce the most
sublime music of the Gods. A rank amateur can produce the infernal discord of
Pandemonium. It's the player who makes the mistakes, not the piano.
A mathematical universe means a universe based on
perfect mathematical notes. However, these notes can be subjectively assembled
in infinite ways, and countless of these ways are sub-optimal, and sub-optimal
is synonymous with error, with irrationalism, with departure from the path of
The mathematical universe - viewed from the perspective
of its objective "notes" and laws - is perfect. However, the mathematical
universe also comprises subjective monadic minds, and these minds are capable
of assembling the perfect notes of mathematics in myriad sub-optimal ways,
equating to silly beliefs, opinions, interpretations, guesses, and hypotheses
about the nature of reality and how best to live life.
Religion and Spirituality
It's remarkable how much drivel is talked about the
alleged difference between religion and spirituality. The fact is that all
religions are spiritual, and all spiritual beliefs are religious. What people
are actually referring to is the difference between dogmatic, organised, collective
religion, and pick 'n' mix, personal spirituality, whereby a person subscribes
to no particular mainstream religion, but, like a jackdaw, picks up whatever
shiny object he can find from religion, science, mathematics, or anywhere else.
is a religion because it's predicated on the soul, on immortality, on evolution
towards perfection ("God"), on the attainment of absolute knowledge, on the
strength of the spirit and will, on teleology, on the utter rejection of
materialism. It does not, however, rely in any way on faith, revelation, popes,
priest, prophets, sin, heaven and hell, or any kind of Creator.
The dying Genghis Khan didn't want his tomb found, so
he gave instructions to his soldiers to butcher everyone they saw on the way to
his chosen burial site, to kill everyone involved in constructing his tomb, and
then, finally, to kill themselves. It seems that they were true to their orders
because nearly 800 years after the bloody warlord's death, the location of his
tomb remains unknown.
The tomb is said to conceal an incredible treasure,
brought from every corner of the Khan's vast Mongolian empire. The site of his
tomb is a "forbidden zone", a "great taboo".
The "Experience" Delusion
Old people try to gain an advantage over young people
by referring to their superior "experience." Well, let's consider the whole
issue of experience. Old Abrahamists, no doubt, have had countless experiences
and yet they are as stupid as they were the day they were born, and they still know
nothing about true reality. So much for experience.
The "voice of experience" is frequently the voice of a
fool, a charlatan and a bully. A smart twenty-year old can be much closer to
enlightenment than some pompous, sanctimonious, self-inflated, crashing old
bore telling everyone how much life experience he has (but thus proving it was
all to no avail since anyone who had learned from life would know never to play
the old man's card).
People who think that experience rather than reason is
the way to enlightenment are as deluded as you can get. How many old folk do
you know who have decades of experience, yet know nothing of the secrets of
existence? Such people are legion.
Experience is valuable only if it helps you to reason
better, and, if it doesn't, it's worthless.
Many people would be well-advised to forget everything
they think their experience has taught them and start again from scratch. They
need to downsize their experience and upsize their reason, intelligence and
It's not experience that separates people but reason. A
young, smart person is much closer to the truth than an old, experienced,
Referring to "experience" is simply a means for silly
old men to big themselves up and pretend they know shit. Most of them know fuck
all ... and are exactly the people who made the world the shithole and mental
asylum it is today.
Remember the maxim that must be applied to all
experience: have you had a thousand different experiences, or the same experience
a thousand times? Dull-minded people just keep repeating the same old same old,
and believing the same old same old. They never learn a thing. They're too
dumb, too arrogant and too lazy to learn.
Many old people are experienced in things that are now
obsolete. A vast amount of people's experience becomes obsolete long before
they're dead, rendering all such experiences worthless and irrelevant to the
world. If experience is useful, why do billions of people still believe the superstitions
of the ancient Middle East?
Experience and progress do not go together. Most
geniuses do their masterwork before the age of 25 ... before they are corrupted
The truths that Plato talked about are still true
today. The experiences of the old gits who mocked Plato are forgotten and
In the face of the Truth, you must be as humble as
possible. Experience has nothing to do with Truth. Countless human beings have
had countless experiences ... how many of these same people have told you the
Truth of Existence, down to the finest detail? How many of these people believe
the same old shit with which their parents brainwashed them? How many of them
still believe crazy old, refuted religions from the Bronze Age? Billions of
people today still believe that Moses parted the Red Sea, that Mohammed met the
Angel Gabriel in a cave, and that the rabbi Yehoshua ben Yosef was God! So, of
what value is experience? Only reason and intelligence count.
"Experience" is just another form of faith, just
another subjective opinion, conjecture, hypothesis, interpretation. It has zero
The eternal truths of reason of course existed before
the instant of the Big Bang. There are no eternal truths of experience. If you
want to know what preceded the Big Bang, you have nowhere to go other than
reason. And if you don't know what preceded the Big Bang, you will never know
anything about reality, and you will never reach enlightenment.
The world is not suffering from a shortage of
experience, but it's certainly suffering from a severe deficiency of reason,
intellect and knowledge.
When it comes to experience, there are two types:
valuable and worthless. For most people, their experiences are worthless, and
they never learn anything from them. Valuable experiences are those that make
you more rational, and better able to recognize the rational truth.
Many older people were fooled in their youth, and have
never forgotten the shame of being duped. However, rather than developing
greater reason so that they can see through bogus claims, they have simply
become cynical, skeptical, closed-minded and paranoid. If you placed the Truth right
in front of them, they would never see it ... because they would be terrified
it was just another con to deceive them. Many older people voluntarily blind
themselves to the Truth.
A statement purporting to be rational is either right
or wrong. Faith doesn't come into it, opinion doesn't come into it, and
experience doesn't come into it. Don't let any old bores prattle on about
experience. Ask them what they know and what they can prove, and you will soon
discover that they know nothing and can prove nothing, and all they have to
offer you is bitterness, cynicism and skepticism. Most older people have failed
in life, and everything they say reeks of failure, and they are terrified of
anything new that they know they won't be able to understand because that will
make them even more obsolete, and even bigger failures, so they end up railing
against everything new and becoming utterly conservative and reactionary.
For 99.9% of people, your experience of life is valueless
if you imagine it has told you even one thing about ultimate reality. Living
and knowing are two totally different things. Living gives you countless
experiences, but it doesn't tell you what reality is. Endless people have come
and gone without having established any relationship with the Truth.
There are people who say things such as, "There are two
kinds of knowledge: false knowledge, which all belief systems are - you have no
experience of them yourself, but you keep talking about 'higher planes', for
example. And there is true knowledge, which is intrinsically tied to your own
But this is absurd. Your "knowledge" of your
experiences is exactly that: knowledge of your experiences. It's not knowledge
of everything that you DON'T experience, the whole of existence outside
yourself, the whole of unexperienceable, noumenal, ultimate, rationalist
reality. Those people who say that their experiences constitute knowledge are
solipsistic clowns. People in madhouses have never-ending experiences. What
sane person would accept that these experiences reflect real knowledge?
You get people who say, "ALL knowledge tends to
de-mystify existence, which is a mistake: Existence is inherently mystical."
This is an outright attack on knowledge, and a formula for mystical obscurantism,
faith and, ultimately, total solipsism. (Moreover, it's often exactly the same
people who say that all true knowledge is tied to your own experience who also
say that existence is inherently mystical, i.e. it has nothing to do with
knowledge, and true knowledge is fundamentally impossible, which raises a
blatant contradiction in referring to "true" and "false" knowledge in the first
place. If existence is inherently mystical, "false" knowledge is no falser then
"true" knowledge, since knowledge has no meaning in a mystical system
explicitly predicated on the denial of authentic knowledge.)
You get people who say, "Real wisdom is not parroting
false knowledge, but comes from the heart and from experience." Well, that's
neither wisdom nor knowledge but sheer emotionalism and solipsism, with no
validity beyond the person saying it.
You get people who say, "And Enlightenment happens when
all thoughts stop, but you are still conscious." This is the sort of irrational
drivel that such people constantly spout. Leaving aside the absurd idea that
thoughts can stop in inherently thinking beings, consciousness MEANS being
aware of your own thoughts. If all of your thoughts have stopped than you have
ceased to exist, and if you are not aware of any of your thoughts, you are not
conscious. In neither case have you achieved Enlightenment. In fact, you have
achieved the opposite.
Such remarks are all too typical of New Age
irrationalism, which is all about the heart, the senses, the gut, and
experiences, but never about the head, reason, intellect, knowledge, and mathematics.
These people think they know something, but don't in fact know anything at all.
people like to refer to experience rather than knowledge? It's because their
subjective experiences can't be contradicted. However, their claims to knowledge definitely can!
All the charlatans - lying through their teeth to you - hide behind "experience". Here's what we stand behind: 1 + 1 = 2!!! Now, fuck off anyone who disagrees with that!
No New Age "gurus"
ever refer to provable or evidential statements. They only ever refer to
personal anecdotes, personal feelings, personal experience, personal
intuitions, their personal Mythos ... total subjective nonsense.
Do you have something to say or nothing worth
hearing? As Pythagoras said, "Be silent or let thy words be worth more than
silence." All the New Age spiritualists ought to embrace silence ...
Never listen to anyone telling you personal anecdotes,
and about their "experiences". That's the opposite of knowledge. The whole of
Christianity, Buddhism and Islam flows from ridiculous personal anecdotes and "experiences".
It's Mythos garbage. You'd need to be deranged to believed that another person's
experiences can reveal the truth of existence to you. Unfortunately, most
people ARE deranged. They are submissives who lap up everything that
charismatic dominants tell them, no matter how ridiculous. "Islam" is just one
giant personal anecdote by a psychotic dominant, and lapped up by the
submissive Arab hordes.
The whole of Buddhism results from what some freaky old geezer
experienced while sitting under a tree. How mad would you have to be to be a
The whole of Christianity flows from some Jewish rabbi's
delusion that he was the Son of God.
The whole of Judaism flows from one guy (Abraham) who
thought that God ordered him to murder his own son, and from another guy
(Moses) who held a conversation with a burning bush!
Don't you see? It's all these stories, anecdotes, and "experiences"
that are the source of the Mythos lunacy that gullible, credulous people
In modern times, David Icke had a mental breakdown,
started wearing purple and believing himself the Son of God. Then he said that
the Illuminati were shapeshifting, pan-dimensional aliens. Er.... !!! Not
surprisingly this nutter has hundreds of thousands of followers. It has always
been thus. Read the God Series by
Mike Hockney if you want to stop being insane! It doesn't contain a single
anecdote or reference to personal experience. It doesn't ask for your trust, or
for you to believe anything. It utterly condemns faith, mysticism and
We often get accused of hate. So what? We DO hate. We
hate all of the morons getting in the way of humanity's divine trajectory, all
of the clowns who believe in ancient stories of weird, psychotic tribes
wandering in the Middle East in search of God (and having visions of burning
bushes, angels, and so on), all the fools who believe in love and light, the
pacifist cowards, the politically correct liberals who want to destroy freedom
of expression, the idiots who worship democracy, the deluded who imagine they
are unconditionally free to do what they like, the selfish, greedy capitalists
... absolutely everyone putting the brakes on the advance of humanity.
You're living in a fantasy world if you believe the
problems of this world will be solved by people saying, "Peace, man; give me a
big hug; love and light", or sitting under a tree to meditate (what a pointless
exercise ... a clear manifestation of anti-life forces, of running away from
life so as not to "suffer").
What has delivered humanity's control of its
environment and its ability to land men on the moon - mathematics and science,
or religion and meditation? No prizes for getting the right answer.
Only reason will set humanity free. Only intelligence
will solve our problems. The people who say that we should not hate the
irrational are themselves the irrational and deserve to be hated.
This is a dialectical universe, and, if you understand
what that means, you will know that hate is one of the primary drivers of
enlightenment. Humanity progresses to enlightenment as much through hate as
love... that's what the dialectic is all about.
Don't be afraid to hate. Always hate what deserves to
be hated. Otherwise, you are aiding and abetting the hateful, and you are
therefore hateful too (and not the "nice" person you delude yourself that you
are). Never tolerate that which should never be tolerated, for otherwise you
are giving solace to the intolerant. Always hate irrationalism or you yourself
are promoting irrationalism.
Never forget that enlightenment is all about knowledge,
about understanding the true workings of reality. It has nothing to do with
pacifism, liberalism, hippies, meditation, "om", karma, or Eastern religion.
Never equate enlightenment to love and non-hate. Always
equate it to the highest reason, intellect and knowledge, to revealing how the
universe works in its innermost kernel. If you get this wrong, your whole life
will be wrong.
There are countless people who believe themselves on
the path to enlightenment who are in fact entering upon the road to absolute
endarkenment. Buddhism, for example, is entirely false ontologically and
epistemologically, hence has zero truth content. It's just one ancient guru's
opinion of what enlightenment is, and if you listen to the wrong guru, you've
thrown your whole life away.
We never ask anyone to believe us or trust us or listen
to our "experience". What we say either makes rational sense or it doesn't, and
if you can outreason us and disprove us (which would require you to be a genius
in the field of ontological reason and ontological mathematics - good luck with
that!), you ought to reject everything we say. That's the test we apply. If
something - such as Buddhism - is unquestionably irrational, we reject it.
If you can't trust your own reason, you're in real
trouble. You should agree with us only if your reason mandates it (which it
will if you're a highly intelligent person, and won't if you're not, in which
case you will certainly oppose us, denounce, and call us "fakes", liars,
madmen, pseudo-Abrahamists, and so on).
We get legions of carping trolls who read only about
three pages of our material - and then feel absolutely qualified to dismiss it
as nonsense while they peddle their absurd pet theories. They say we are full
of hate, while they themselves direct nothing but hate towards us. They accuse
us of being divisive like the Abrahamists, and then fail to see how divisive they
themselves are. So it goes. Stupid people never see themselves for what they
are. We have nothing against divisiveness, provided you're on the right side of
the divide. In fact, we dialectically rely on it. What we can't stand is
divisive, toxic trolls calling us divisive. Take a look in the mirror, why don't
you?! There's nothing worse than divisive people saying they are against
divisiveness. They have no self-awareness at all. If you are a person who is angry,
frustrated, and hateful towards many people, embrace it! Why do you think
evolution gave us these emotions?! Don't disown your own nature to listen to
some deluded guru or self-appointed preacher man.
Don't feed the clowns, Don't interact with them. If you
do, they'll drag you down to their gutter level.
The Mediocre Souls
Don't be one of the monochrome souls, one
of the legions of the mediocre and totally forgettable. Mediocre souls do not
commit any noteworthy crimes or sins, but nor do they do anything to achieve
greatness and recognition, any acts of merit that would earn their entry ticket
to the Elysian Fields.
Mathematics traces the patterns of eternity. It
draws the face of God himself.
"The earth was formless and void, and darkness was
over the surface of the deep…" - Genesis 1:2
But "God" wasn't formless and void. Form, order
and organisation always exist. There's no such thing as the "formless and void".
The state preceding the Big Bang wasn't "formless and void". It was mathematical
Form defined by the God Equation. It was the Fourier frequency domain, which
gave rise to the Fourier spacetime domain. At no stage was there any
formlessness or void anywhere at all. True formlessness and void don't exist.
The fabric of existence is noumenal, ontological mathematics, the quintessence
of form, order, and organisation.
The point of the dialectic is to overcome unreason.
The universe is mathematical, but also unconscious. How does an unconscious mathematical
system solve itself? How does it optimise itself? It can't carefully,
rationally plan what to do. It can't sit down and work out a strategy. So, what
it does is execute the necessarily crudest rational procedure possible - the dialectic.
It proposes one thing (the thesis) and then brings this
into conflict with its opposite (the antithesis). When the smoke clears, what
remains is the synthesis. This serves as a new thesis, which will in turn
generate a new antithesis, and a new synthesis, and so on. We keep going round
and round, but, critically, each iteration is higher than the previous one -
like a spiral - and the process converges on a final conclusion, the tip of the
spiral - the Omega Point.
The dialectical process resolves all contradictions,
errors, falsehoods, fallacies, delusions, opinions, interpretations,
hypotheses, conjectures, inconsistencies, and incompleteness.
It brings the universe to mathematical, rational
perfection, which is the point of PERFECT MATHEMATICAL SYMMETRY. This is where
mathematical Form and Content are aligned, where Form (which was always
consistent and complete) at last coincides with Content (which was inconsistent
and incomplete until "cured" by the dialectic).
The dialectic is guaranteed to turn unreason into
reason, or, to be more accurate, non-optimised reason into optimised reason.
Most people in the world deploy extremely primitive reason, based on their
feelings, senses and mystical intuitions. It's not that they are irrational,
but, rather, that their rationality is crude, infantile, inefficient and ineffective.
Smart people use reason far more effectively than stupid people.
Humanity has, over tens of thousands of years,
progressed from living in caves to landing men on the moon because of the
dialectical evolution of reason, and nothing else. Faith didn't land men on the
moon; opinion didn't land men on the moon; guessing didn't land men on the
moon; old men banging on about their "experience" didn't land men on the moon;
priests, rabbis, imams, gurus, popes, sages, shamans, witch doctors, magicians,
Buddhas, and the spiritually "enlightened" didn't land men on the moon. Haven't
you got the message yet?
It's the smart, rational, knowledgeable, intelligent
people who lead humanity forward. They are the ones on the side of the advancing,
rational dialectic. All the rest are the antithetical dialectical forces they
are obliged to overcome.
We have countless enemies - the legions of morons who
wouldn't understand ontological mathematics and ontological dialectics in a
trillion years. They oppose us because they are terrified of us. They know that
we spell their doom. They are the dinosaurs waiting for extinction. Reason will
wipe out all those opposed to reason. Soz!
It's when your capacity for reason starts exploding
exponentially that you achieve gnosis, gain complete knowledge of the workings
of reality, and become God.
The universe has a rational answer, and when you are
rational enough, you can know it and live it ... and that's what God is.
The prize on offer to all Illuminists is that you will
become the Gods that consciously
direct the universe towards its Omega Point. You will be the ones in the
driving seat, fulfilling the internal impulse of existence towards perfection.
All the rest - the followers - will be riding on your tails.
As an inevitable stage of the dialectic, the blind,
rationally sub-optimal unconscious is turned into visionary, rationally optimal
consciousness, which can then rationally plan how best to conclude the
dialectical process, and it does so through the actions of all-powerful
rational Gods, the Gods that have evolved from amongst humanity! Are you one of
them? Do you have the potential?
The Illuminati is THE secret society devoted to the
completion of the dialectic and to being the agents of dialectical culmination,
a task reserved exclusively for those rational and smart enough to become Gods.
Are you one of those who can drive the universe to its
appointed conclusion? Only the finest human beings are eligible, only they are
called, and the worst of humanity will resist us to the bitter end. So it goes.
The dialectic is the quintessence of polarisation.
You cannot arrive at the Truth via hippie consensus, "respect" and "love". The
Truth isn't the mid-ground, the liberal centre, the position of maximum
tolerance of error, falsehood and delusion. The Truth is as extreme as it gets.
The world must be liberated from the long,
unendurable darkness. This benighted world must be illuminated, so that it can
fulfil the greatest of all destinies, the DIVINE DESTINY. Are you one of the
evolving Gods, or one of the enemies of the dialectical Gods, and a believer in
the decrepit Creationist Gods of ancient myth?
We endorse Plato's Republic and Rousseau's Social
Contract. We want the Hegelian dialectic to be built into every aspect of
society. We are wholly opposed to unelected, unaccountable, unintelligent "markets"
allowing the rich to invisibly and sinisterly control the gullible, ignorant masses.
We seek a Star Trek future where organised
religion has been utterly marginalised, free-market capitalism abolished, the
super rich rendered extinct, and the world is ruled by the smartest, most
intelligent and talented members of humanity.
Sophia ... wisdom.
Philosophy ... love of wisdom.
Science ... knowledge (Latin).
Gnosis ... knowledge (Greek).
Logos ... Reason.
Mathematics ... Learning.
Illuminism is all about reason, learning, knowledge, and
wisdom. We are opposed to organised religion, faith, New Age syncretism and spiritualist
bullshit, doped-out hippie nonsense, "love and light" claptrap, conspiracy
theories, and so on.
We don't rate the experiences of stupid people, only of
smart people who have learned from their mistakes and put their experience to
good use, rather than simply becoming arrogant, self-inflated and in thrall to
their own propaganda and self-delusions.
We advocate using the scientific method to study the
empirical, phenomenal, observable world, and the mathematical method to study
the rational, noumenal, unobservable world.
We want to bring about a Second Enlightenment where a
True Age of Reason is inaugurated, and the scientific and mathematical methods
are extended to all aspects of society.
Gnostics aim to achieve gnosis (enlightenment). Gnosis does not mean experience, it does
not mean love, or faith, or peace, or kissing, or hugging, or chanting "om", or
sitting cross-legged under a tree, or meditating, or any of the other garbage
that's fallaciously associated with enlightenment by those who haven't the
vaguest idea what enlightenment is. If you think you're well on the path to
enlightenment then where is your clear answer for what reality is? Put up or
shut up. If you can't provide such an answer, you're just a blowhard and charlatan.
We have provided our exact answer in the God
Series of books, and we defy anyone on earth to refute us. It's impossible
to defeat reason and knowledge. That's a fact, and only a fool - an empty vessel,
toom tabard, and false prophet - would try.
Experience doesn't trump reason. Empiricism doesn't
beat rationalism. No empiricist ever has or ever could define existence.
Existence has only one rational answer - ontological mathematics, defined by
the God Equation (the generalised Euler Formula).
Illuminism emphatically isn't for everyone. It's only
for the smartest people on earth, and that means the most rational, intelligent
Don't listen to any narcissists who can't disprove a
single word or number of ontological mathematics, yet blabber on incessantly about
how false, phoney and worthless Illuminism is.
We know that we are casting peals before swine, but we
also know that there are a few higher souls out there who are intellectually
capable of recognising the truth when they come across it.
If you don't understand mathematics - or, alternatively
music, light, electricity or holography (which all express it) - you will never
understand existence. The mystery of existence is the mystery of mathematics.
All the strange things of existence are encapsulated in the two numbers zero
As you would expect, stupid people will convince
themselves that math is not the answer. That's the nature of such people.
Math isn't the answer people are looking for. Math is
the answer they AREN'T looking for.
Who wants the Truth? Certainly not the average person.
They want any old bullshit that makes them feel good. You could write the
answer to existence in letters and numbers a thousand metres high in the sky,
and the average person still wouldn't "see" it.
We have zero interest in what average people consider
the answer to existence, or what they think they're looking for. What they're
really seeking is the validation of their own egos, delusions, fantasies, opinions,
beliefs and interpretations. It has always been thus. Mathematics is the answer
to existence because it's the thing furthest removed from human self-delusion.
Here's the real issue - do you believe that you are
smarter than reason itself? Do you think you can beat reason? All enlightened
people reach a very simple conclusion ... nothing can be superior to reason,
and reason is expressed through mathematics. From that everything else follows.
We have a rational universe purely because it's made of
reason (mathematics), and, if it weren't, it wouldn't be rational. People who
think something other than math/reason is the answer to the rational/
intelligible universe are just unbelievably dumb ... and totally irrational
It's easy to show people the answer to existence, but
getting them to understand it is more or less impossible. You need to be
rational to understand the rational universe. You need to be intelligent to
understand the intelligible universe. People are neither rational nor
intelligent ... which is why people believe never-ending bullshit.
If you're clever, you'll already know that, and you
will treat with contempt the irrationalists who try to tell you that you're
wrong and that they're right because they have "experience", or faith, or
sensory evidence, or mystical intuition, or whatever other nonsense such people
Here's a message to all stupid people ... don't
worry, you will all be cured in the end ... by the dialectic. That's its job
... to turn fools (base metal) into Gods (gold).
Helen of Troy
(plural Hellenes): a Greek,
especially an ancient Greek.
Should we refer to "Helen" of Troy as "Helene" of
Troy? The story of the Trojan War is the story of something or someone
extremely precious to the Hellenes (Greeks) being taken by the Trojans, and
having to be recovered, no matter the price, for the honour of Hellas (Greece).
The current Pope has made so many casual remarks that
defy orthodox Catholic theology that, 500 years ago, he would have been burned
at the stake as a heretic!
The Pope is just a PR man, designed to be "nice,
liberal and cuddly", a media-friendly figure. Catholicism purports to be about
Absolute Truth, and no Catholic can contradict today what the Catholic Church
pronounced true yesterday. According to the Catholic Church, all non-Catholics
are damned to hell ("There is no salvation outside the Church"), animals don't
have souls, and the Pope is Jesus Christ's substitute on earth ... until the
Spammers send people messages with subject lines
saying things such as, "You have an email that MUST be read." Some people find
it very hard to resist reading something that "MUST be read". Religions are
ancient spamming schemes that say, "You MUST read this Holy Text, and you MUST
believe it or terrible consequences will befall you." Historically, many
submissives found it impossible not to go along with the "prophets" - the ancient
religious spammers who sent their spam to every corner of the world.
What are the laws of nature? Did they pop out of
nothing and then evolve? If a miracle is defined as a violation of the laws of
nature then how do we refer to events that happened prior to the existence of
the laws of nature? They can't violate these laws since the laws don't exist.
However, nor are these events rational or lawful, which renders them magical
A miracle ought to be defined as anything irrational,
inconsistent, and inherently incompatible with laws of nature. In which case,
anyone who denies that the laws of nature are eternal is claiming a miraculous
origin of the laws of nature.
Well, here's the thing ... if the laws of nature as
regards spacetime and matter did not exist prior to the Big Bang (since there
was no spacetime or matter), as science claims, then these laws were generated
miraculously! That is, science is formally predicated on the miraculous
appearance of laws of nature out of nothing at all, yet science claims to be a
rational undertaking (!).
If you do not accept the existence of miracles then you
are committed to agreeing that the laws of nature are ETERNAL, and that means
that the laws of spacetime and matter ALREADY EXISTED prior to the Big Bang,
because otherwise they would have miraculously appeared from nowhere.
Mathematically, there's an extremely easy way to make
sense of this situation. Prior to the Big Bang, what existed was a pure
frequency domain - an immaterial Singularity outside space and time. Thanks to well-known
Fourier mathematics, frequency functions can be translated into spacetime
functions. In other words, the laws of spacetime and matter did not magic
themselves into existence out of nothing, but are eternally implicit in the
eternal mathematical laws of nature regarding immaterial frequencies outside
space and time. And what are such frequencies? What are immaterial entities
outside space and time? They are none other than immortal, indestructible
mathematical SOULS. They are eternal, autonomous Fourier frequency domains.
They are SINGULARITIES. Singularities = minds!
What do you want - a designed, intelligent economy
run by meritocrats appointed by the people and accountable to the people,
fuelled by reason and with the Public Good as its defining property ... or an
undesigned, unintelligent market economy run by unelected rich elites with no
accountability to the people, fuelled by irrational exuberance, by greed and
fear, boom and bust, with private profit, wealth and power as its defining
property? Your choice. Should the people rule (democracy and meritocracy), or
the private elites (free-market capitalism and privilege)?
The Natural Deceiver?
Nature does not deceive. Humans misinterpret Nature,
hence deceive themselves about Nature. Nature is fully knowable if you speak the
language of Nature, and do not misinterpret it via manmade languages and belief
systems. Galileo said, "Philosophy is written in that great book which ever
lies before our eyes - I mean the universe - but we cannot understand it if we
do not first learn the language and grasp the symbols, in which it is written.
This book is written in the mathematical language, and the symbols are
triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, without whose help it is
impossible to comprehend a single word of it; without which one wanders in vain
through a dark labyrinth." Mathematics is indeed the language of Nature, and
the very fabric of existence. If you do not accept this, you are simply
irrational and do not understand the first thing about Nature.
The first task in understanding Existence is not to
look to your "experiences", your beliefs, senses, feelings, mystical
intuitions, stories (Mythos), holy texts, opinions or interpretations, but to
understand how Nature sees itself, what its own language is - entirely independent
of the human race - and what Nature is actually made of.
Pythagoras gave the answer two and half thousand years
ago: "All things are numbers; number rules all." The eternal things that
precede humanity and are wholly independent of the human race are NUMBERS, and
thus mathematics. Mathematics IS NATURE, and humanity is so bad at
understanding reality because it is so bad at math, and so ignorant of math.
Not a single religion of the world has ever proclaimed mathematics as the
Truth. They have proclaimed everything other than math to be the "Truth", and
have thus told humanity nothing but lies.
"[Eric Voegelin] identified the root of the Gnostic
impulse as alienation, that is, a sense of disconnection from society and a
belief that this lack is the result of the inherent disorder, or even evil, of
the world. This alienation has two effects:
"The first is the belief that the disorder of the world can
be transcended by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a
Gnostic Speculation by Voegelin (the Gnostics themselves referred to this as gnosis).
"The second is the desire to implement and or create a policy
to actualize the speculation, or Immanentize the Eschaton, i.e., to create a
sort of heaven on earth within history.
"According to Voegelin the Gnostics are really
rejecting the Christian eschaton of the kingdom of God and replacing it with a
human form of salvation through esoteric ritual or practice.
"The primary feature that characterizes a tendency as
gnostic for Voegelin is that it is motivated by the notion that the world and
humanity can be fundamentally transformed and perfected through the
intervention of a chosen group of people (an elite), a man-god, or men-Gods,
Übermensch(en), who are the chosen ones that possess a kind of special
knowledge (like magic or science) about how to perfect human existence.
"This stands in contrast to a notion of redemption that
is achieved through the reconciliation of mankind with the divine. Marxism
therefore qualifies as 'gnostic' because it purports that we can establish the
perfect society on earth once capitalism has been overthrown by the 'proletariat.'
Likewise, Nazism is seen as 'gnostic' because it posits that we can achieve
utopia by attaining racial purity, once the master race has freed itself of the
racially inferior and the degenerate.
"In the two cases specifically analyzed by Voegelin,
the totalitarian impulse is derived from the alienation of the individuals from
the rest of society. This leads to a desire to dominate (libido dominandi) which has its roots not just in the Gnostic's
conviction of the imperative of his vision but also in his lack of concord with
a large body of his society. As a result, there is very little regard for the
welfare of those who are harmed by the resulting politics, which ranges from
coercive to calamitous (e.g. the Russian proverbs: 'You have to crack a few
eggs to make an omelette', 'When you chop wood, chips fly)." - Wikipedia
Which side are you on - that of the Abrahamists
(Believers) or Gnostics (Knowers) ... those who wait for heaven or those who
plan to build heaven?
drive or energy"; desire; lust; the instinct for life, growth, reproduction,
If democracy (people power) cannot be separated from
free-market capitalism (elite power) then it's pointless and a fraud! The
people can never be in charge in a world of capital controlled by an elite few.
Why isn't that self-evident? Because the elite have constructed a false
consciousness in the gullible, credulous, ignorant sheeple so that they believe
whatever the elite tell them.
The First Law of Thermodynamic Continuity?
So, does the First Law of Thermodynamics imply that
something can erupt out of non-existence for no reason at all and with no
explanation at all - as science claims - PROVIDED that the something thereby
produced has an equal positive and negative component, meaning that "something"
balances to "nothing" (thus ensuring that there's no technical violation of
energy conservation)? Doesn't that look like a Sophist's version of the First
Law of Thermodynamics, an exercise in clever, specious accounting? If the First
Law says that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed, doesn't
that MEAN that energy is ETERNAL? Surely it doesn't mean that energy can be
summoned out of nothing at all just so long as it never exceeds nothing? That
looks incredibly like energy being created from nothing at all, from non-existence!!! In fact, how can
that conclusion be avoided?
Isn't the First Law of Thermodynamics about the
CONTINUITY of energy? That is, you can't have non-existence (non-energy)
discontinuously and miraculously leading to sudden energy production (but of
such a nature that the energy produced has zero net effect)? In these terms,
the Big Bang, as conceived by science, is emphatically an outrageous and
impossible violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics of ontological energy
conservation and continuity.
In order to explain away the Big Bang, science has
constructed a wholly fraudulent misinterpretation of the First Law of
Thermodynamics, whereby energy is not eternally conserved, but, rather, can
come and go at will, provided the accountant's energy calculations always have
a net effect of zero. Such a universe would be a universe of magic, miracles
and total chaos - nothing like the observed universe. Moreover, the absurd
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics allows enormous violations of
energy conservation (amounting to borrowing energy from the past and/or
future!), provided the violation is rapidly rectified (via energy borrowing
being swiftly repaid). Again this is a silly exercise in energy bookkeeping and
has no connection with energy in ontological terms.
Anyone who thinks that science's Big Bang, or science's
take on quantum mechanics, is compatible with ontological energy conservation
is retarded. Go back to bed!
In ontological mathematics, the First Law of
Thermodynamics is in fact a mathematical law, not scientific. It describes an
infinity of positive sinusoidal waves, negative sinusoidal waves, real
sinusoidal waves, and imaginary sinusoidal waves. These are eternal, analytic,
immutable, indestructible, immaterial, noumenal, ontological, Platonic waves,
outside space and time. They are the invisible, immortal fabric of existence,
from which all visible things come. Their total sum is EXACTLY ZERO, and this
is true at all times and forever.
Compare and contrast the mathematical First Law of
Energy versus the scientific First Law. In the mathematical version, energy in
itself is simply mathematical waves - eternal analytic vibrations - which can
be neither created nor destroyed. Nor can they be transformed. It's the
contingent COMBINATIONS of waves - WAVEFUNCTIONS - that undergo transformation,
not the necessary waves themselves. There is an eternal mathematical order of
existence, immaterial and outside space and time, outside the entire paradigm
Science, on the other hand, says that non-existence is "unstable"
- although it can't explain how or why, or even how such a claim makes any
sense. It believes that non-existence can randomly and spontaneously generate
existence ... that energy CAN come from nothing (i.e. can be created AND
destroyed), provided that it never has any net non-zero value (or doesn't
violate any non-zero condition for any sustained length of time).
If you're a rational and intelligent person, you will
understand that science's version of the First Law is ridiculous, and the
precise opposite of ontological energy conservation. It literally claims that
energy can come from nothing, and return to nothing, in complete contradiction
of the First Law. It seeks to claim to be consistent with the First Law on the
basis that a net result of "nothing" hasn't in fact produced any energy out of
nothing, because "nothing" is exactly what remains when the bookkeeping is
done. It's an accountant's understanding of energy! This is a spectacularly
bogus, specious and fraudulent argument because it has at its core the exact
opposite of the true First Law of Energy - that energy is ETERNAL, that nothing
necessary can be created, and nothing necessary destroyed.
So, what preceded the Big Bang? According to science,
non-existence did, and it magically, miraculously and inexplicably generated
the material world of spacetime. The world in effect summoned itself into
existence - the most absurd claim ever made in the history of thought, even
worse than that "God" created the universe out of nothing!
According to ontological mathematics, on the other
hand, an immaterial Fourier frequency domain (Singularity), outside space and
time, preceded the Big Bang, and the material world of spacetime was
constructed from it out of an inverse Fourier Transform. It's all in the math!
Rationalist ontological mathematicians, unlike irrational
scientists, do not have to invoke magic, miracles, randomness, spontaneity, accident,
chance, inexplicable wavefunction collapse, indeterminism, acausality, the
violation of the First Law of Energy, and all the rest of the garbage that science
claims is "rational".
Scientists cannot in any way prove their speculations
to be true, and they cannot in any way contradict ontological mathematics, yet
they believe science to be the unarguable truth of reality. What a joke!
Ontological mathematics utterly, unarguably, rationally, proves that science is
false and mathematics true. Do the math!
Scientific materialists are barely more rational than
Abrahamists and Karmists, and some of their "explanations" of reality are even
Humans are story people. They follow story logic and
believe the most absurd stories, provided the stories have an internal "logic"
that appeals to them, comforts them, and through which they "understand" the
world as a great story. The Bible is just a giant story - a novel purporting to
be reality and Truth. Just like all popular novels, the Bible contains zero
mathematics, zero science, zero philosophy, and zero Logos. It is sheer Mythos
from beginning to end, with zero Truth content. It's a compelling emotional
extravaganza, and nothing else.
Andromache (wife of Hector of Troy) to Helen of Troy: "When
you walk in a room, the men smell sex, the women smell death."
Helen: "No, the women smell sex, that is why they detest me.
The men smell death and it smells exciting, because it smells like war." (Simon
Armitage's The Last Days of Troy)
The God Series
The God Series
is the guaranteed answer to everything ... but only if you're smart enough. Why
would anyone imagine that the Truth is available to stupid, irrational people,
people obsessed with faith, or with their own feelings and experiences, or with
mystical intuitions, or their fallible senses? Truth is about reason and only
the most intelligent people can use reason properly.
The Illuminati Authors: Mike Hockney, Adam Weishaupt, Michael Faust.
A Curious Thing
It's a curious thing, but many of the people who come
to this website are just about the last people we would want to be reading it
and taking an interest in it. Their understanding of it is close to zero, and
in fact they stand for more or less the opposite of what we advocate. We
attract many "spiritual" types, but we endorse hyperrationalism. What a fuck
Do not read this website unless you agree that
mathematics - the most daunting subject of all, dealing with the two greatest
mysteries of all ("nothing" and infinity) - is the only conceivable, rational,
analytic answer to the mystery of existence. If you hold any other position,
you are an irrationalist and this site contains nothing of value to you.
Modern America was founded by exactly the same kind
of people who are now building the "Islamic State" in the Middle East. i.e.
religious fanatics, extremists, fundamentalists and grim Puritans, obsessed
with the infallibility of their holy text, hated and persecuted in their
home countries, and wishing to flee to a new land to build the perfect Holy,
Godly Nation, reflecting their sacred Covenant with God.
America, to this day, is full of right wing religious
nuts and conspiracy theorists who despise the Government and the Godless State,
and imagine Communism and Atheism encroaching everywhere. American "patriots"
and the 9/11 "Truth" Movement are - with their constant, insidious YouTube
videos spreading their hatred of the State and ludicrous conspiracy theories,
all designed to radicalise vulnerable, irrational youths - just the mirror
image of the internet-savvy Jihadists ordering young Muslims to rise up against
their Governments and States to overthrow them.
The Jihadists want to set up a Koranic caliphate; the American
"patriots" want to set up Ayn Rand's ultra-capitalist Market, where Government
and the State have been abolished, and everything is run by the market.
It's not Government and the State that need to be
overthrown, it's BAD Governments and BAD States, to be replaced by GOOD
Governments and GOOD States, serving the public good and Commonwealth. No
Government or State led by greedy, selfish, right-wing capitalists who support
the private good over the public good can be anything but toxic.
Free-market capitalism has led to the greatest
financial inequality in human history. Is that supposed to be progressive and
serving the public good? The facts have spoken. Right wing ideology leads to Dictatorship
by the rich elites, and the enslavement of the rest of us. All right wingers
are Enemies of the People, and the supporters of the tyrants that want to have
total power over the people.
"I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming
feature." - Thomas Jefferson
"Question with boldness the existence of God. I
do not believe any of the Christian doctrines. The greatest enemies of Jesus
[are the doctrines and creeds of the church]." - Thomas Jefferson
Christianity is the least rational religion of
them all. It doesn't make any sense at all. Christianity sees its greatest
strength as its claim that God incarnated on earth and lived as a human being.
This is fantastic in Mythos terms, but is unintelligible and deranged in Logos
terms. By definition, God cannot be a human or experience the human condition.
The comic strip character Clark Kent lives as a human,
but he's NOT human, KNOWS he's not human, and knows that he can turn into
Superman at any time. Such a person has zero true understanding of the human
condition because, obviously, you need to be human to have that understanding.
Jesus Christ, if you believe Christianity, was God, and
that, automatically means that he wasn't human. Christianity seeks to have its
cake and eat it by claiming that God was both fully human and fully divine - a
total logical impossibility.
The world is full of people peddling grievance
narratives and entitlement narratives. Where is the Hero narrative, the merit
narrative, the intelligence narrative, the achievement narrative?
Enlightenment has nothing to do with "peace and love".
We arrive at enlightenment via the dialectic, and the dialectic is the most
savage thing there is: the exterminatory war of opposites. The dialectic
eventually brings us - some of us -
to knowledge of reality, and that is the knowledge that reality is made of
mathematics and IS mathematics. The Buddha knew nothing about mathematics and
denied the existence of the eternal monadic soul via which mathematics is
carried ontologically, hence he was a staggeringly unenlightened individual
with zero understanding of true reality.
On what basis would any rational person ever choose to
be a Buddhist? Buddhism is all about subjective experiences and feelings. It is
not a logical, rational, complete and consistent system of ontology and
We get innumerable right wing trolls ranting and
railing against us. All of them are psychopathic narcissists. They think they're real
special, real smart. But special, smart people can point to great
accomplishments. Not one of humanity's achievers, of humanity's winners,
has ever spent time trolling. People troll because their lives are
empty. They're crying out for attention. They're consumed by narcissistic rage
and want to big themselves up ... to stop themselves from collapsing.
These are eggshell people, waiting to break.
The Triple Problem
Reality is made out of numbers (mathematics), but
numbers are information, and information is interpreted as Content ... as sensory
Think of the visible portion of the electromagnetic
spectrum. Every different frequency is associated with a different colour, i.e.
each different number (frequency) has a different sensory property. In fact,
the whole of reality is based on different frequencies being interpreted in
different sensory, emotional and intuitive ways. We don't SEE the frequency
(the number), we EXPERIENCE the frequency (as non-number, as informational
Moreover, we "understand" the world via non-numerical,
non-mathematical, manmade VERBAL languages, which are ideal for telling stories
(Mythos), but useless for dealing with the mathematical Truth of reality
(Logos). In other words, our senses, emotions, intuitions and languages all
conspire to convince us that reality is anything other than mathematical. Only
the finest, brightest, most rational and intelligent minds can cut through all
of the phenomenal illusions placed in our path and arrive at the noumenal Truth
that the unseen substrate to existence is pure mathematical sinusoidal waves -
the ultimate information carriers.
Ontologically, sinusoidal waves ARE numbers, i.e.
numbers do not exist as anything other than the frequencies, amplitudes and
phases of mathematical waves, and all numbers have non-numerical, sensory and
empirical Content associated with them, as we see with the different
frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum.
If you accept that this is an information universe, you
must accept that something carries the information. Because you encounter the
information carried, you do not encounter the information carrier, i.e. you
encounter the information as phenomenon and not as noumenon (the information in
itself). Mathematical waves are the information in itself, but these can never
be detected by anything. They are ontological, noumenal CAUSES, but only their
ontological, phenomenal EFFECTS are perceived.
You need to be a rationalist, not empiricist, to grasp
that mathematics underlies everything but can NEVER be detected in itself. You
need to be a genius to understand this. And, if you don't "get it", you can be
sure that all of your opinions about the nature of ultimate reality are utterly
false and delusional. Whether you like it or not, mathematics is the SOURCE.
Science uses mathematics all the time. Has science ever
explained what mathematics actually is and why it's essential to science? You
must be joking. Science can't explain why it has mathematics at its core - i.e.
it can't explain itself - yet it purports to be able to explain the universe to
us. How ridiculous!
Not a single person outside of the Illuminati has ever
explained what mathematics is ontologically, and what numbers are
ontologically. If you think you're so smart, go right ahead and explain what
mathematics is and how and why it exists at all. Bear in mind that the truths
of mathematics are ETERNAL, and that means, of course, that mathematics
PRECEDES any human being.
You are either for the public good or the private
good. If you are a free-market capitalist, you are ipso facto for the private
good since capital belongs to the private elites and not to the public.
There's nothing more sickening, hypocritical and
fraudulent than free-market capitalists pretending to be on the side of the
People. All right-wingers support the private over the public good, and that's
because they see much greater opportunity for greed and selfishness if private
elites are in charge rather than the public. All right-wingers are friends and
allies of the elite 1%, hence they are automatically Enemies of the People.
The Golden Age
According to Hesiod, the Golden Age ended when
Prometheus stole the fire of the Gods and gave it to mankind. This act of
disobedience is the classical equivalent of the disobedience of
Adam and Eve, causing them to be driven out of paradise.
But what Prometheus and Adam and Eve prove is that we
do not need Gods, and we ourselves can become Gods.
We are the new Prometheans, the new Faustians. We won't
take just the sacred fire from the Gods, but everything they have.
The world is divided into two: those who are on their
knees to the Old Gods, and those who are becoming the New Gods. There can be no
reconciliation between these two groups. They are diametrically opposed. One
group thinks "God" is outside them, and the other that "God" is inside them.
There can be no greater difference.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an
optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
It's easy to look at the world and see everything
in decline and going to hell in a handcart, yet any situation can be
transformed ... if you have sufficient will. The intelligentsia have always
lacked will and have always taken the cowards' way out and served religious,
political, military or economic elites with vastly stronger will. But
everything will change when the smart people ally Nietzschean will to their
intellect. Nothing will be able to beat them. They will become as Gods.
If you want to picture the "Prophet" Mohammed, think
of a man exactly like Abraham, standing over his child, ready to kill it
because of a voice in his head commanding him to do it.
Osama bin Laden would have been very like Mohammed. If
Mohammed lived today, he would be proclaiming Global Jihad and demanding the global imposition of Sharia Law, cheering on every
Muslim terrorist, and ordering them to martyr themselves as they smite the
infidels. US special forces would be after him, and he'd probably die in a
The First Law of Life
Scientists mock the notion of the "spontaneous
generation" of life. Wikipedia says, "Spontaneous generation or anomalous
generation is an obsolete body of thought on the ordinary formation of living
organisms without descent from similar organisms. Typically, the idea was that
certain forms such as fleas could arise from inanimate matter such as dust, or
that maggots could arise from dead flesh."
Aristotle said, "[Some animals] spring from parent
animals according to their kind, whilst others grow spontaneously and not from
kindred stock; and of these instances of spontaneous generation some come from
putrefying earth or vegetable matter, as is the case with a number of insects,
while others are spontaneously generated in the inside of animals out of the
secretions of their several organs."
The remarkable thing is that science, despite its
protestations, surely DOES believe in the miraculous generation of life from
death, dirt or dust. According to science, life comes about by arranging
lifeless atoms in certain ways, and mind from organising mindless atoms in
If you think it's irrational to claim that life
magically comes from non-life and mind from non-mind then you are obliged to
conclude that there is a First Law of Life and Mind, equivalent to the First
Law of Thermodynamics, i.e. mind and life can be neither created nor destroyed,
only transformed (via consciousness arising from the unconscious, for example,
or necessary life shifting from one contingent body to another via
This First Law of Life and Mind is enshrined in Leibniz's
Monadology, but is rejected by
scientific materialism, according to which life and mind are contingencies that
magically emerge - with no conceivable rational explanation, mechanism or
precedent - from dust ... dead, inert atoms.
It's truly astounding that scientists consider
themselves rational when their arguments are so often shown to be based on
magic and miracles, on the utterly inexplicable and illogical.
The Hidden Persuaders
Who are the Hidden Persuaders? Who are the Subliminal
Projectors? Who are the False Consciousness Constructors? Who are the
practitioners of Subliminal Seduction? Are you one of their victims? How would
Who are the Primers, priming you for their sinister subliminal
Are you the victim of Agency Panic? This is defined as an intense fear that you can be
shaped or controlled by powerful forces outside yourself; that you have lost
your own agency and are now being manipulated by an external agency.
"The Movement is and always has been a group whose
purpose and agenda is to not only revolutionize and rationalize political,
economic and social systems, but to do the same with religion and spirituality.
No one, with decent critical-thinking skills, can deny that as a whole, the
current religious system found on the world stage is not only inadequate but
entirely irrational. There are uncounted religious beliefs in our society based
purely upon faith. But that's all they are: BELIEFS. You can literally believe
anything you want if you try hard enough. That doesn't make it true though -
"That's always been the problem with religion;
religious people aren't concerned with cold hard fact or evidence. They want
what works, period. They want what's comfortable, what's easy, what they were
born and raised on. Once again, just because something works for you, it
doesn't always mean it's the best option (or the right one for that matter).
Abrahamic religions work perfectly for a lot of people, specifically because
they're making big bucks selling pure myth. They are literal dream sellers.
Imagine selling people the same reworded and rewoven story - which is made up,
time and time again - about a myth which was handed down by their ancestors,
who also reworded the story and completely changed the moral: in reward for
spiritual salvation and immunity from eternal death. Talk about selling souls!
"You could create the most flashy, dramatic, violent,
exciting, thrilling, sexy, scandalous religion in the world and attract
millions of followers and make millions of dollars but if it isn't based on
logic or immutable truth, then it literally isn't worth one iota in terms of
our personal/collective growth and development. In fact, it has the opposite
effect: by keeping us distracted and docile using the same classic trick of
bread and circuses. L. Ron Hubbard understood that better than anyone, 'You
don't get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a
religion.' - Hubbard.
"We've already seen and read enough entertainment
religion to realize that stories and fables designed to teach us life lessons
are the same old strategy that is getting us absolutely nowhere and still
continuing to push us ever deeper into the primordial slime. Religion doesn't
always have to entertain the emotional reptilian brain. Why not entertain the
rational brain with religion? Why not entertain the intelligence? Why not
entertain critical, lateral thinking? When is society going to realize that the
true religion and the science of the spirit is not about a dead bearded
superhuman, a man God, who has laid down irrational rules that where literally
MEANT to be broken from the very beginning, thousands and thousands of years
"People demand truth. People demand proper information.
They always will. That's what makes us human. As they say, knowing is half the
battle. Seeing how you can't know it all at once and will spend your entire
life learning and adapting, what could be more of a sacred cause than that?!
What could be a more holy religion than one that requires spending countless
hours and years learning all there is to know until we have transcended our own
existence? We should never base our decisions regarding something as sacred and
important as our own eternal souls on opinionated, manic driven, delusional
stories which are as preposterous as the day is long. Regardless, there is at
least one religious view on earth which is in fact correct. That is statistically
a fact. Someone has to be right. How could there possibly not be a right answer
to the great secret of existence? Some have figured it out. Few have solved
every mystery. There is an answer. Can you crack the code?
"Christians literally make Christ out to be a
superhero. They think he can do ANYTHING. Walk on water - no problem. Turn
stones into bread - piece of cake. Heal the blind and raise the dead - a walk
in the park. Born of a virgin, rose from the dead on the third day - mere
child's play for the lord and savior. But accept people of all faiths,
religions, creeds and morals into the pearly gates of paradise? FORGET ABOUT
IT!!!! You're asking too much now!
"It's this exact kind of thinking which has allowed
Christianity to have flourished so prosperously. If you make Jesus into the
perfect hero, which is capable of doing all of the impossible (including save
you from anything you want), as long as you are slavishly obedient down to his
every last word, repent your sins, and pay up at communion every Sunday, then
you have literally made the pitch perfect system for spiritual and social
manipulation, as well as deliberate corruption. 'Mass mind control works in mysterious
ways' should be their real mantra.
"It doesn't end there. Human beings naturally and
inherently crave mythos. They require it. That's why Christianity is so
alluring. Mythos is what gives us the spiritual release needed in religion that
is not so easily accessible through logic.
"Logos and mathematics have no such effect on
irrationally thinking people, (hence why they are completely absent from the
superstitious religions). In fact, a race of thinking, reasonable people would
have the polar opposite effect on their preposterously corrupt system.
"Abrahamism is so successful because it appeals to
instant gratification that our emotions beg for, instead of the long, relentless,
demanding, rational path of knowledge.
"And the emotions are of course, the irrational part of
our brains. It's fucking genius. Perhaps entertainment and emotional ecstasy
needs to be injected into a guise of Illuminism for the sleeping masses to
finally wake up.
"God is internal not external. He didn't create you,
you create him, (as we all do). God is the collective light of all our souls,
creating pure potential, waiting eagerly to be maximized. God is the
consciousness within that is responsible for literally everything in our lives.
Our bodies are simply vessels and temples for this "holy spirit". Physical
reality doesn't tell the whole story. Light can never be physical nor material.
Yet without light, all things physical have literally vanished to our senses except
to the touch. Color is pure light corresponding to chemicals in the brain based
on our visual senses. Thus, darkness represents that which is physical and material.
"God is the dialectical, mathematical synthesis of existence.
He is the omega point at the outer most edge of the universe where Gods are
transfigured into pure mind and full consciousness. This final process of the
great chain of being is called the Omega Point. God then regenerates himself
into the lowest form of existence (inanimate matter) via the divine suicide.
Ash to ash, as above so below.
"Let the light shine." - TB
You hear self-appointed "gurus" proclaiming that
there are many paths to Enlightenment. Maybe so, but there's only one destination.
So, forget the paths ... what is the destination? That's what you need to focus
There are many paths to Manhattan, but if you don't
take a path that terminates at Manhattan, you will never reach Manhattan. Exactly
the same is true of Enlightenment. Enlightenment is a specific state and there
are countless paths that DON'T lead you there, so you had better know exactly
what path you're on and where it's leading. Or do you imagine that any random
path is as good as any other?
Existence has only one answer. If you claim that
there are as many answers as there are people then: a) you are a total
relativist, b) you have denied that there's any Absolute Truth or Absolute
Knowledge, c) you have said that any answer is as good as any other, d) you
have said that any answer is no truer or falser than any other.
To claim that there are many answers is actually to say
that there are no answers. It would be like a mathematics exam where anyone can
give any answers they like, and everyone gets a 100% test score. Sure, people
have provided "answers", but they are any old answers, and totally meaningless
Therefore, there is only ONE answer. Well, do
you know what it is? Where's your analytic, eternal proof? Do you think your "experience",
your faith, your senses, your emotions, and your mystical intuitions are going
to help you? Dream on! The world is full of idiots who think they know answers
but are simply believing their own self-serving propaganda.
On any Facebook page discussing Illuminism, you will
find several cretinous trolls who do nothing but badmouth this website and post
literally hundreds of messages denouncing it in every possible way. Many of
them say that the Illuminati doesn't exist. Well, isn't it very odd to spend time
hanging around Facebook pages devoted to a non-existent, a total
fantasy? If you "know" that it's all nonsense, why haven't you moved on? Isn't
it utterly perverse behaviour to spend your life devoted to something that you
yourself have proudly proclaimed doesn't exist? What kind of person obsessively
posts hundreds of messages regarding an absurd fiction?
You are defined by your behaviour, by your actions, by
what you do with your time. So, those people that deride this website have
decided that the most important thing in their entire life is to deride this
website (!). This is the task to which they have devoted themselves. They
literally don't do anything else. They are posting their sniping, carping, cynical,
skeptical comments all day long. What sad and pathetic lives these people have.
They have nothing positive in their lives. They feel compelled to commit their
whole lives to negativity, to slagging things off, to destruction, to trolling,
to trying to aggravate people and creating doubt and cynicism.
When you go to any Facebook page, you always have a
choice: to be positive or negative. All psychologically healthy people seek out
Facebook pages where they can be positive. But what about the sick people, the
mentally ill people? Well, they seek out Facebook pages where they can be as
negative as possible. They LOVE being negative. They feel empowered by it. They
get off on ridiculing people, bullying people, bigging themselves up and
putting others down. They are looking for their narcissistic codependents.
They are desperate for you to bow to them, to tell them
they are right and you are wrong. It infuriates them if you don't acknowledge
their "brilliance", the "fact" that they have seen through all the bullshit,
that they alone haven't been duped, yet you most certainly have. They spend
their time being negative - on Facebook pages with which they have zero
sympathy or empathy - because their real purpose is to exercise power over YOU.
That's what thrills them. They don't want to go to Facebook pages with which
they agree because then no one would notice them. Their "talent" is for
attacking and contradicting, nor for agreeing and cooperating.
Any Facebook page that gives a platform to such people
is anti-Illuminist, and actively helping hawk predators to attack Illuminism.
Illuminism is about retaliating against psychopathic hawks, and if you don't
retaliate then you are not an Illuminist.
Anyone who posts hundreds of anti-Illuminist messages
should be blocked from any Facebook page purporting to have Illuminist
sympathies. There are no end of places for people to attack the Illuminati. Why
aren't these trolls on those pages? Because that would be no fun for them. If
you tolerate these people, it's purely because you're a pathetic, submissive
Now and again, people try to contact us. We always
ignore any such people if we have noted that they subscribe to Facebook pages
that are full of anti-Illuminist trolls. We have better things to do with our
time than waste it on sad sacks and losers. We engage with positive people, not
with trolls and their fellow travellers and codependents.
Only the worst human beings are attracted to constant
negativity and to being where they are not wanted. If you tolerate these
people, you're as bad as they are. As Edmund Burke said, "All that is necessary
for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Equally, "All that is necessary for the triumph of
trolling predators is that their victims do nothing." We see several allegedly
pro-Illuminist Facebook pages that look exactly like anti-Illuminist pages
given that so many trolls are posting on these pages. Any such pages ought to
close down. If administrators can't block trolls, they ought to give up. We
ourselves closed down our Facebook page because we had better things to do than
read messages by trolls, and to be forever engaged in blocking these pointless,
Think of your own behaviour. Do show up every day on
a Facebook page to pour out negativity and cynicism? And if you wouldn't do it,
why do you think that any decent person would? You have to remove toxic
influences from your life, and that means getting as far from trolls as you
can. If you have any trolls as Facebook friends, you're as bad as they are. You're
reinforcing them. If you can't recognise a troll, it's because you're one ...
or one of their codependents.
your kink on ... Sex for Salvation!!! Only in kink is the true nature of your sexual
partner revealed ... and your own nature. Only kink frees you from the
politically correct, vanilla bullshit, from the Persona World of fakes, phoneys
and frauds, of everyone pretending to be something they're not. In kink, all
the masks drop and your true self is revealed.
"If only I could disprove the AC site, everyone
would see how great and powerful I am." - predator narcissist
"If..." - the AC site (with thanks to the
Everyone on earth is welcome to attempt to
disprove ontological mathematics. Good luck with that! Of course, you'd
actually have to be intelligent and know what you're talking about to even try ...
which rules out all the predator narcissists. All they ever blabber on about is
"Satan" and their "experiences" and their idiotic beliefs. Not once do they
mention mathematics, science or philosophy. To discuss these things, you
must actually have knowledge. Bullshit and anecdotes don't cut it.
Knowledge versus Belief
People KNOW that 1 + 1 = 2. Christians BELIEVE
that Jesus Christ is GOD. They do not KNOW this. They have no evidence or proof
for this claim. All non-Christians do not believe it.
1 + 1 = 3 is a belief. There's nothing to stop people
from holding such a belief, but it has absolutely nothing to do with knowledge.
It's astounding how many people don't know the
difference between knowledge and belief. Belief is DEFINED as an acceptance
that something is true without any evidence, proof, reason or logic. Knowledge
is that which is accepted as true on the basis of evidence, proof, reason or
logic, i.e. it's the exact opposite of belief.
People who despise knowledge like to claim that
mathematics is a belief system, and thus they prove that they have zero
understanding of both mathematics and knowledge. These people literally know
nothing. They are people of faith only. They do not accept that knowledge is
knowledge. They regard 1 + 1 = 2 as a contingent belief rather than as a
necessary, incontrovertible fact! You cannot argue with such people. They are
You cannot BELIEVE in knowledge. Knowledge is knowledge
precisely because it does not involve belief. A belief can be converted into
knowledge if and only if evidence or proof emerges that vindicates it. And
knowledge can be found to be based on belief if it contains some element for which
there is no rational ground. Science, for example, has a belief that what
preceded the Big Bang was non-existence, capable of spontaneously creating
Knowledge, like belief, need not be correct, but, no
matter what, it must have a basis other than belief. The only knowledge that is
infallible and absolute - literally incontestable - is the complete and
consistent knowledge of ontological mathematics.
"The doctor developed a way to open up a wormhole to
another dimension that we call Null Space. It's a kind of limbo that runs
parallel to our world. When you leave Null Space you can emerge at any point in
the universe. ... It also has time travel properties. You can go backwards or
forwards in time. The doctor teleported the plane to Null Space. It went in,
but didn't come out." - from the movie TERMINATION POINT, about an exponential
spacetime crisis that could potentially bring about the end of the universe.
In terms of ontological mathematics, the "Null
Space" is actually the immaterial frequency domain, outside space and time.
So, all you worshippers of science, does the First
Law of Thermodynamics state that you can genuinely never create or destroy
energy, as ontological mathematics asserts, or that you can create and destroy
energy as much as you like, provided that there is no sustained net effect, as
To put it another way, ontological mathematics says
that there's an eternal order of energy, thus an eternal ontology and
epistemology, which has an EXACT (mathematical) net effect of zero, while
science says that existence can randomly, spontaneously, miraculously and
inexplicably leap out of non-existence, just so long as no net effect is
ultimately left behind, implying an entirely different ontology and
Well, go on, all you geniuses who think you know shit
about science, which version is right, which version is more rational and
Not a single scientist anywhere on earth has ever dared
to answer this question, and none ever could. Can you do any better? Are you
fucking hard enough and tough enough?
It's very simple, if energy is eternal - and can be
neither created nor destroyed under ANY circumstances - then the WHOLE of
scientific materialism immediately falls. Its basic ontology and epistemology
are 100% false. That's a fact.
If science cannot define energy properly, it can't
define anything properly.
What came before the Big Bang? If energy is eternal
then it automatically follows that immaterial, non-spacetime energy preceded
the Big Bang, i.e. frequency (mental) energy in an immaterial Singularity outside space
and time. Otherwise, the Big Bang magically summoned itself out of nothing at
all, for no reason at all, as science ludicrously and irrationally claims.
Can you DISPROVE what we have said about the TRUE -
mathematical - version of the First Law? Good luck with that. If you can't, why
are you a slavish believer in the quasi-religion of science? You're a person of
faith, not of reason and knowledge.
It's a zero-sum game between science and ontological
mathematics. If one is right, the other is automatically wrong. Math doesn't
need science at all ... but where would science be without math? So, which is
the senior partner ... which actually tells you about fundamental reality? It's
a no-brainer for any rational person, but that excludes scientific
materialists. Like religious fanatics, they dogmatically refuse to engage with
questions such as these, and never draw any attention to them.
Where is your scientific method to resolve this issue? Ho, ho, ho. Good luck with that!
Up and Down
Who's up, who's down? The rich are always up, and
you are always down! Haven't you figured it out yet?
Apes, Humans and Evolution
If we have all evolved from some apelike ancestor,
why should we conclude that we have all evolved equally? Aren't some of us
still close to the apes, and some of us further removed? If some apes remind us
of humans, isn't it the case that some humans remind us of apes?
The Lost Cause?
"If we take the widest and wisest view of a
Cause, there is no such thing as a Lost Cause because there is no such thing as
a Gained Cause. We fight for lost causes because we know that our defeat and
dismay may be the preface to our successors' victory, though that victory
itself will be temporary; we fight rather to keep something alive than in the
expectation that anything will triumph." - T. S. Eliot
While a glittering Roman general was enjoying a
glorious Triumph through the thronged streets of Rome, a slave stood behind him
and whispered in his ear, "All this will pass. You are nothing but dust."
Isn't that what someone needs to tell today's super
Winston Churchill said, "Where there is a great deal
of free speech there is always a certain amount of foolish speech."
In today's world, free speech leads to an avalanche of
foolish speech. Social networking has released the greatest tidal wave of
idiocy in human history. Where fools used to be placed in the corner wearing a
Dunce's cap, now they pontificate on everything under the sun on the internet.
Facebook and Twitter have given maximum expression and liberation to mental
illness. Many people who arrive at this website have come here for all the
wrong reasons, to get validation of their mad ideas and beliefs. When you read
Facebook pages dealing with Illuminism, you can't help but notice that many of
the contributors are clearly mentally ill, and not far removed from believing
Illuminist pages also attract trolls in droves. These
are people whose only desire is to wreck, destroy, mock, ridicule, pour out
negativity and contempt. They have zero positive contribution to make. They
have no constructive instincts whatsoever and are always exclusively driven by
bitterness, hatred and revenge. They consider themselves "inside dopesters" ...
people who imagine that they know what's going on in the world and can't be
duped - but they are in fact just clueless dopes who get fooled all the time,
mostly by themselves, by their own arrogance and closed minds.
They say things such as a book can be taken seriously
only if it's written by a recognised authority with a reputation to uphold.
This is the classic fallacy of the "appeal to authority" - the idiotic belief
that only recognised "experts" can ever be right, and what they say is
automatically superior to what anyone else says. Of course, every single great
advance in history has been produced by geniuses attacking the received wisdom,
overthrowing the claims of the established experts and rendering their dinosaur
Why do billions of people still believe in ludicrous
ancient religions? It's exactly because they too look to "authorities" to tell
them what and how to think. These people can't think for themselves, can't use
their own reason. A reputation counts for nothing if you're wrong. An expert is
only an expert until he's not. The only subject that deals in infallibility is
Trolls have only one instinct - to use whatever
argument suits their case at a particular moment. One moment, they revere "authorities".
The next moment, they will quote from some wacky guru, or even put forward
their own weird and wonderful beliefs. You can't have it both ways. If you
think that only books by establishment experts count then you are obliged to
parrot their opinions at all times because you yourself have no right to make
any claims since you are not a recognised expert. Why would we listen to the
parrots when we can listen to the "experts" themselves? You ought to become
voiceless if you have declared that only the establishment's chosen experts can
But trolls are never worried by consistency, logic and
reason. They say whatever is expedient to their trolling activities, whatever
can put other people down and big themselves up. Their own narcissism is always
their primary and indeed exclusive preoccupation.
Trolling is one of the most unfortunate aspects of the
modern world, and a total abuse of "free speech". Free speech mustn't be
allowed to degenerate into "foolish speech", or it will become utterly
valueless, and even dangerous. It will represent an immense obstacle to human
progress, the opposite of what free speech was supposed to accomplish.
Pro-Illuminist sites should have zero tolerance towards
trolling. Trolling is certainly a kind of "free speech", but not a kind that
any rational person would endorse. When was the last time you found a troll
improving the human condition with their toxic outpourings?
Trolls want to use "freedom" to destroy others, not to
improve the world. Is that really the type of freedom that meritocrats want to
The Meaning of Number
Number, ontologically, is energy. Numbers are
frequencies of sinusoidal waves. They are not abstract pencil marks you make on a
piece of paper. Waves - i.e. numbers - comprise the fabric of existence. We exist in an
ocean of waves, numbers, information, energy. They all mean the same thing.
NUMBERS ARE WAVES. WAVES ARE ENERGY. ENERGY IS INFORMATION.
DH: "100% inheritance tax? Ahahaha! Good luck making that a reality!"
Allowing 80 people to have as much wealth as 3.5 billion people. Ahahaha! Good luck making that a reality! .... oops, it has already happened!
What's the point of "Illuminist" pages that give a platform to parasites, living off the leftovers of the dead?
Occupy Wall Street opposes Big Business (Capitalism).
The Tea Party opposes Big Government (Democracy).
Which side are you on?
There's no such thing as "capitalist democracy". There is either capitalism (private power) or democracy (public power). Which side are you on?
The awesome, indestructible, indomitable, indisputable CLARITY of mathematics. Nothing else is clear. Everything else involves seeing through a glass darkly.
David Icke believes himself an expert regarding the "Illuminati"
- shapeshifting, pan-dimensional alien lizards, apparently. He's an expert in
his own fabrication of the "Illuminati", not in anything to do with the actual
"Researchers" are self-declared "experts" in researching
the gossip, rumours, speculation, conspiracy theories and memes regarding
societies such as the Illuminati. They have no actual knowledge of these
societies and their deep backgrounds. How could they? They're not members, so
everything they say can be dismissed as pure speculation, fuelled by their
personal, political, religious and economic agendas.
The Illuminati were originally condemned as left-wing,
anti-Catholic, anti-monarchy, anti-rich fanatics (French Revolutionary Jacobins).
Today, they are routinely portrayed as Jesuits, monarchists, bankers, Jews,
crony capitalists, Washington D.C. politicians, and so on, i.e. the 100%
opposite of the original portrayal. When this happens, you can be sure that you're
dealing with people's projections, which have no basis in reality.
"Illuminati" is simply the label given to some
allegedly unseen group controlling the world, onto which conspiracy theorists
project all of their hatred and frustration. People such as Alex Jones and
David Icke relentlessly stoke people's fears and paranoia and make a very
healthy living from doing so. They don't write books about philosophy, science
and ontological mathematics!
The people running the world are no mystery. All you
have to do is follow the money. Who are the small group of eighty people who
have as much wealth as three and a half billion people? That's who is running
the world! Duh! 1 + 1 = 2.
Illuminism is about ontological mathematics, and
always has been. Pythagoras was the first ontological mathematician. You won't
find any mention of ontological mathematics outside the God Series. What does that tell you? It tells you that this
material cannot have been borrowed from any other source in the world, and that
means that either some random person invented ontological mathematics in the
last few years - the most astounding intellectual feat of all time - or that
the God Series reflects an ancient
source of secret knowledge, accumulated by humanity's finest minds. Well, which
The question you always have to ask yourself is whether
this material is available anywhere else and could have been copied from
anywhere else. If not, it's genuine.
All fakes and frauds are copies or obvious fantasies
(such as those of David Icke). You can't create a fantasy regarding ontological
mathematics. Mathematical claims are either right or wrong. You can't hide
behind Mythos. You're in pure Logos territory.
We note that not one troll has ever attacked our Logos
material. Not one has ever shown any awareness at all of ontological
mathematics. All they blabber on about is "Satan". Who is Satan? Satan is the
Demiurge: Jehovah, Jesus Christ, Allah - the "God" of Abrahamism. We are those
who call for the complete abolition of Abrahamism and thus Satanism. We are not
the Satanists ... the trolls are!!!
Any of our critics who does not mention ontological
mathematics has no credibility, and to understand ontological mathematics you
would need to have total knowledge of the millions of words of the God Series, including the remaining
books of the series that have not yet been published. The trolls have no
knowledge whatsoever of the God Series.
The entire extent of their knowledge regarding us is a few pages they've
skimmed read of this website.
People always hate and fear what they don't understand.
They feel a tremendous compulsion to rubbish it so that they don't have to
worry about it. Imagine if you took Illuminism seriously. You would then have
about five million words to read, regarding material of which you have no
knowledge, and which is staggeringly complex, dealing as it does with the
mathematical fabric of existence itself.
Rather than go down that rabbit hole, the morons and
trolls simply shout, "It's fake, phoney, fraudulent, nonsense, fabricated,
idiotic, Satanic, evil, copied, based on the writings of Crowley ... or
whatever." Not once do they engage with ontological mathematics. They don't
even know what it is, and they're certainly not going to spend any time finding
out because then they would have to admit that everything they believe about
reality is false.
You must be humble when you approach Truth and
Knowledge, and stupid trolls are NEVER humble. They are always self-serving
narcissists, and they only like things that they can use for their own
advantage. Truth and Knowledge are of no use to them, and they don't want to
talk about them. They want to talk about their experiences and beliefs, and
The AC site can actually be used as a means of
detecting narcissists. Anyone who rails against, while showing no substantive
knowledge of its enormous content, is plainly a narcissistic psycho troll. They
have a real problem with the AC site because they are so intimidated by it.
They know that if we succeed, they fail. It's a zero-sum game.
In the new world, the trolls, narcissists and
psychopaths will be powerless and marginalised. Talented, positive,
constructive men and women will be running the world, and the rulers of the old
world will be in zoos, safely shut away from decent people. They won't be able
to pull anyone down anymore. The Age of the Troll and Bully will be over once
and for all, cured by the Age of Reason.
Whistleblowers don't stand a chance. The people they
are blowing the whistle against are the ones in charge, the ones who will be "investigating"
their complaint. We all know how that's going to turn out, don't we?
Meritocracy versus Religious Faith
ST: "I want meritocracy that will not be controlled
by anti-religion government. I want a meritocracy which gives anyone the
freedom to choose his religion."
Let's get this crystal clear. Mainstream religion
- Abrahamism or Karmism - is totally incompatible with meritocracy. No one who
believes that some people are going to eternal paradise and others to eternal
hell depending on what absurd fantasy-God they believe in has any place in a
rational meritocracy. No one who believes in a caste system has any place in a
rational meritocracy. No one who believes that people are being controlled like
puppets by the actions of their past lives has any place in a rational
meritocracy. Meritocracy is not about perpetuating the Old World Order. It's
about replacing it with a New World Order. Faith must be abolished.
The last thing that any meritocratic State would ever
tolerate is exactly the kind of religious mania that has made meritocracy
necessary in the first place, as its cure! Absolutely never tell anyone that
meritocracy is not opposed to mainstream religious faith. It emphatically is.
In a meritocracy, no one can be free to believe that some meritocrats are going
to hell for disagreeing with them.
Religious faith is 100% incompatible with meritocracy.
If you don't agree, you should leave the meritocratic movement immediately
because, self-evidently, decrepit, evil old religions are more important to you
than rationalist meritocracy.
Meritocracy is about eradicating insane beliefs, not
condoning and perpetuating them in the name of some absurd multi-cultural
political correctness. We don't respect people of religious faith. They are the
enemy, not our allies! How dumb do you have to be to give these religious nuts
the time of day? We ARE against them, and we make no apologies for that, just
as they make no apologies for saying that we are all going to hell.
Get real, people. Stop living in La La land. This is
not a liberal world full of pacifist doves. It's a dialectical bloodbath where
hawks will prey on you and pick your bones without a moment's hesitation. We don't want any Abrahamists anywhere near our movement.
You don't have to formally join anything to become a member of
The Movement. If you agree with its agenda, you simply assume the identity of one of our activists. The
same goes for the Illuminati. You are welcome to call yourself an Illuminatus
if you agree with the manifesto set out on this very large and daunting website.
The Movement will succeed only if it attracts
self-creating, self-defining, ambitious, intelligent, self-motivating, self-initiating,
You don't need permission to become an activist for The
Movement. You just go ahead and do whatever you think can advance the interests
of The Movement.
The Movement is about releasing your creativity. The
trouble with the world is that it's so lacking in creativity, unless it
involves brainless internet memes. People seem to have limitless energy and
interest in producing trivia and junk. All of that goes out of the window when
anything serious is demanded. Humanity has a Triviality Gene of awesome
proportions, rivalled only by the Trolling Gene for totally negative people
with an instinct solely for destruction.
Well, can you do anything serious minded? Can you make
a difference? Can you create? Or you one of life's spectators, bystanders, anonymous
faces in the crowd, and perpetual understudies? Are other people on the stage
of world events, but never you?
Many people think they are great ... until they are
asked to do something great. And then the penny finally drops ... they are
clueless nobodies who can't do anything at all. Their abilities stop at posting
incoherent message on Facebook and Twitter. That's the limit of their ability
to influence the world. They are Ignavi, one and all.
The Movement is about attracting those with actual
talent, those with real energy, those who can manage to do things rather than
just talking about it and deluding themselves that they can do it.
The smarter and more talented you get, the fewer peers
you will have. That's the price of being much cleverer and meritorious than the
people around you. Those who found the Grail were peerless.
The task is to set up autonomous cells of The
Movement, via individuals or like-minded groups of friends, but not to generate
a large, unwieldy organisation where people get bogged down in "politics" and "committees",
and where "analysis paralysis" kills all energy.
Don't worry about activism. Just do it. Do whatever you're
good at, and into which you can pour your energy. Don't worry about making
mistakes. You will make plenty of them. Learn from them and move on. Mistakes
are essential in dialectical development and evolution. Every time you fail,
you will fail a bit better (i.e. less badly), and eventually you won't fail at
all. You will be one of life's successes.
As JFK said, "Only those who dare to fail greatly can
ever achieve greatly." Well, are you daring enough?
What Do We Stand For?
We want to see the end of all of the world's old,
decrepit, psychotic religions. This is the twenty-first century, and ancient
superstitions and tribal "Commandments" have no right to be here.
We want to see the end of predatory capitalism - the
economic system designed to allow a tiny, greedy, infinitely selfish,
narcissistic and psychopathic elite to rule over the rest of us and establish
great dynasties of wealth and power that rule over us in perpetuity.
We want every person on earth to be given a proper
chance to demonstrate their merit, and rise as high as their talent warrants,
without any invisible obstacles being placed in their path, without having to
take part in a game rigged against them, and be the victim of unseen cartels
pulling all of the strings on behalf of chosen (privileged) players.
We want the smartest and most talented human beings to be
leading the world since it would be insane to want stupid and untalented people
at the top - as we currently have.
We have a world where the Peter Principle applies ...
the people at the top have been promoted beyond their level of competence, but
there's no one above them to fire them, and they refuse to be fired by those
below them. We need to ensure that every inept person in an influential position
is accountable to the people and can be easily fired.
We are for public control of society, not private
control. Capitalism is an economic designed to bring about the rule of the
public sphere by the private sphere, via the "market", which is unelected and
unaccountable to the people, and in which the people have no representation and
no say. Free-market capitalism is the exact means by which democracy is
sabotaged and subverted, and the people prevented from controlling their own
You can have rule by the people, or rule by private
markets, but you can't have both. Which is it to be? You MUST choose.
We want the scientific and mathematical methods to be
extended to economic policy, social policy, religious policy, drug policy, education
policy, health policy, police policy, and so on. We want the end of moralising
and sermonising. We want the end of pious, pompous, sanctimonious preacher
people prattling on about their Stone Age moral codes and beliefs.
We want the end of parental abuse of children via
religious indoctrination, and even physical mutilation of babies
We want the end of crazy parents being allowed to bring
up crazy children, made crazy by their parents' crazy beliefs.
We want faith to be abolished, to be treated with no
respect at all. Reason must be the new standard.
We want a Logos Society and an Age of Reason. Mythos
must be consigned to the arena of harmless entertainment.
We want a Second and Final Enlightenment where humanity
at last frees itself of the cancer of ancient religious myths, which have done
more damage to the human psyche than anything else. Ancient religions made, and
continue to make, billions of people deranged.
We can build heaven on earth, but only through reason,
knowledge and an intellectually optimised human race. It shows how retarded the
human race is that there are billions of people who despise the notion of the
maximisation of human intelligence as the primary goal of government policy.
What can you do with a humanity that loves being stupid
and has absolute contempt for intelligence, and no interest in it at all?
We live in a world where money, not intelligence, is
the driving force, and those with money are never going to give up their power
to let the smartest take over. The question is very simple ... what are the
smartest going to do about it? Do they have the will to take over from the
rich? In Star Trek, that's exactly
Humanity's future must be as an intelligent,
meritocratic, rational species, not as a religious species on its knees to
invisible gods, or a capitalist species enslaved and owned by the super rich.
If you oppose us, it's for a simple reason ... you
yourself are irrational and unintelligent, and you know you will not prosper in
a competition with smart people. You will be the dialectical opposition to us.
That's the nature of the world. For us to succeed, you must fail. And you
shall! Be in no doubt about it.
We are on the side of dialectical progress and no power
on earth can withstand that. We are the future of humanity whether you like it
or not. We are Humanity 2.0. You are the dinosaurs, waiting to become extinct,
waiting for your trip to the cosmic abattoir.
Whether anyone likes it or not, the following terms
are inevitably going to become synonymous: The Illuminati, Illuminism,
Meritocracy, The Movement, The Dialectic, The Republic of Laws, The Social
Contract, The Monadology, The Second Enlightenment, The Age of Reason, Logos,
Ontological Mathematics. All of them go together indissolubly. While it might
be desirable for terms such as "Meritocracy" to be completely separated from
the name "Illuminati", with all of the baggage that word now carries, the
enemies of Meritocracy will insist on making the connection, just as they will
insist on linking 100% inheritance tax - the fundamental basis of a rational,
meritocratic world opposed to privilege, cronyism, nepotism and hereditary rule
and power - with either fascism or communism in order to discredit it. That's
the way the world works.
You have to be prepared to defend the whole rationalist
agenda, or not at all. The war is between a rationalist, Logos future for
humanity and the continuation of an emotional, sensory, mystical, Mythos
humanity, as we currently have.
Meritocracy must be about a revolution in the nature of
the human race and how it operates, or it's just another silly, pointless
fringe activity. It must be allied to a radically new vision of humanity and
its destiny, or has zero chance of succeeding.
The world is already full of powerful systems:
Abrahamism, Karmism, Democracy, Monarchy, and Free-Market Capitalism.
Meritocracy can never succeed unless it inspires people much more than any of
these others, and that means it must aspire to be an all-embracing formula for
transforming the human condition. It cannot be just another marginal political
party and pressure group.
Meritocrats must have Grand Vision. Anything else is
certain to fail. No one is going to become attracted to meritocracy unless they
see it as the definitive, dialectically inevitable cure for all of humanity's
ills. Marxism cast itself in exactly those terms, and became massively influential.
But Marxism was merely a dialectical thesis, opposed in due course by
capitalist democracy (the antithesis). Meritocracy is the preordained final
synthesis, the cure for both communism and capitalism. Meritocracy is the End
of History, i.e. the final stage of human politics. There will be nothing after
Thanks to the endless propaganda directed against the
Illuminati, most people have completely forgotten what the word "Illuminati"
actually means. The Illuminati are the "Enlightened Ones" ... those committed
to and seeking Enlightenment. If you aspire to a Second Enlightenment, a true
Age of Reason, then you yourself are an Illuminatus.
Why would a group of selfish, endarkened, greedy,
capitalist elitists - the actual people who are self-evidently running the
world - choose the name "Illuminati" for themselves? They obviously didn't, and
they obviously wouldn't. The only people who would call themselves the
Illuminati are those who are preoccupied with the light, with enlightenment -
intellectuals interested in the betterment of humanity, not narcissistic
psychopaths who want to enslave humanity, and pass all of their power and
wealth down their dynastic line forever.
Illuminism, which is really just a different name for
Gnosticism, has never been about anything other than knowledge, reason,
intellect, and understanding how reality operates in order to defeat those who
deserve to be defeated ... the Power Elite, the Old World Order.
It shows how successful the propaganda machine of the
OWO is that is has portrayed their Nemesis as the bad guys. Are you stupid
enough to believe what the Elite's media machine - and their puppet conspiracy
theorists such as Alex Jones and David Icke - tells you?
The Ways of the World
"The public have an insatiable curiosity to know everything,
except what is worth knowing." - Oscar Wilde
"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an
idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
"Everything popular is wrong." - Oscar Wilde
"Popularity is the one insult I have never suffered." - Oscar
"A man who does not think for himself does not think at all."
- Oscar Wilde
"If you keep doing what you've always done, you'll keep
getting what you've always got ... and you'll keep feeling what you've always
felt." - Unknown
"It's not the truth that hurts us but letting go of the lies."
"I would rather fail in a cause that will ultimately triumph
than to triumph in a cause that will ultimately fail." - Jim Elliot
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." -
"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what
we give." - Norman MacEwan
"If there is hope in the future, there is power in the
present." - John Maxwell
"Nothing changes if nothing changes." - Unknown
"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist,
that is all." - Oscar Wilde
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone
else's opinions..." - Oscar Wilde
"The world is a stage and the play is badly cast." - Oscar
"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde
"You see things as they are and say, 'Why?' But I dream of
things that never were and say, 'Why not?'" - George Bernard Shaw
"Do you deserve truth? You sure seek it, but do you deserve
it? If you want to see real things burning you first have to reach up to the
height of the fire." - Nietzsche
"If you haven't found something you are willing to die for,
you aren't fit to live." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
"Never regret thy fall,
O Icarus of the fearless flight
For the greatest tragedy of them all
Is never to feel the burning light." - Oscar Wilde
We Shall Not Serve
We are not here to serve the Elite. We are not here
to kneel. We are not here to bow. We are not here to grovel. We are not here to
Are you one of the deluded masses that believe that the
rich elites deserve their loot? As Balzac said, "Behind every great fortune
lies a great crime." The Elite are the criminals who didn't get caught, those who
chose and bought the judge, the jury and the law itself.
Will you go on playing a game rigged against you? If
you do, you're the worst of losers. You're pathetic. You're a loser now and
forever. You WANT to be a loser. If you didn't, you would change the game to
ensure that you had as good a chance of winning as anyone else. No person from
an unprivileged background can expect to succeed in a world ruled by privilege.
1 + 1 = 2.
It's time to revalue all values, to reboot the world,
to reload the program for this world. What are you going to do? Are you just
going to bleat about life, or are you going to act, to DO SOMETHING?
The world is full not of the Can-Dos but the Can-Do-Nothings.
Go on, justify your existence. Demonstrate even one
creative thing you have ever done. Show in what way you have made a difference.
Show how you have risen above the Ignavi.
There is no way this world can change unless the Elite
are toppled. So, we ask you again, are you for or against the Elite? What are
you going to do to remove them? Are you for or against 100% inheritance tax,
the tax that breaks the power and wealth of the Elite once and for all? Anyone
who opposes this tax is a friend and ally of the Elite, and an Enemy of the
Your choice is simple. Demand 100% inheritance tax. Do
not take part in capitalist democracy. Do not serve the Elite. Demand the end
of ancient, decrepit, pathetic religions. Demand the Second Enlightenment.
All of us are here in this world. That's a hard fact.
So, what are you going to do with your life - use it or waste it? Are you going
to make a difference, have an impact, give a point to your existence? Or are
you going to drift and bumble along ... be one of the massed legions of
monochrome mediocrities and nonentities that vanish into the background? Will
you be one of the Invisible Men with which the world is full? They come and go
and no one notices whether they were here or not. They live without praise or
blame, as Dante put it. They are the grey people, the blank people, the people
who don't know what to do with the gift of life. The Movement isn't for such
people. The Movement is only for the ambitious, for achievers, for those who
want to change the world, for those who admire world-historic figures, and want
to be one themselves. Are you capable of greatness, or are you one of the weak,
meek, pathetic, apathetic, lazy, inept, unambitious, uninspiring hordes who
just want to dissolve into the ether, as if you had never been in the world at
all? It's your choice, no one else's. It's your move.
We all have an inner fire. It's time to light yours. It's
time to set yourself ablaze. Find those who can stoke and fan your flames to
create a great pyre that lights up the world. Be a burning Viking Longship
pushing out to sea, a blazing star shooting through the heavens, a mighty
flaming beacon illuminating everything around it. Break on through to the other
side ... your divine side.