The Summer Soldiers


"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives everything its value.” - Thomas Paine















Do you dare to open the door?



"How much truth can you bear, how much truth can you dare?"  - Nietzsche







Omega M ... Illuminism, the Movement and the Revolution












The Illuminati are portrayed by conspiracy theorists and Christian and Muslim Fundamentalists as the puppetmasters of the world. The world’s real puppetmasters are self-evident: they are the 80 individuals who own more wealth than half the world’s population. The 80 are the Archons of free-market capitalism, and are propped up by the vast capitalist infrastructure that exists solely to serve their private, selfish interests. They are mired in privilege, cronyism and nepotism. The governments and nation states of the world are fully in their service and never under any circumstances do they take any action against them.


This is the most unequal period in human history. By next year, 1% of the world’s population will own more wealth than the other 99%. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International, asked, “Do we really want to live in a world where the 1% own more than the rest of us combined? The scale of global inequality is quite simply staggering and despite the issues shooting up the global agenda, the gap between the richest and the rest is widening fast.”


The wealth of the richest 80 doubled in cash terms between 2009 and 2014. Increasingly, wealth is inherited and used to finance lobbyists who are paid to further their wealthy clients' own interests, and not those of the people ... of private wealth, not the Commonwealth. All elected politicians are puppets of the Old World Order of dynastic wealth and power.


The true Bible of the Power Elite is Ayn Rand’s toxic Atlas Shrugged, her sickenening hymn to selfishness. Nearly all conspiracy theorists are fanatical Randroids, and they are absolutely right that we are their Nemesis. Our mission is to bring to a permanent end the anti-democratic and anti-meritocratic rule of the privileged, dynastic elites that run the world and create a false consciousness in the sheeple that blindly support them.


Conspiracy theories are used by the Elite to promote the agenda of unrestrained free-market capitalist globalism. Conspiracy theories are all about calling into question the inherent legitimacy of governments and nation states, so that they can be replaced by capitalist markets, wholly controlled by the rich Elite ... by the 80.


The 80 are unelected and unaccountable to the people, and that’s exactly what Elitism - supported by legions of right-wing anarcho-capitalist libertarians and anti-Jacobin conspiracy theorists - is all about. The right wingers of the world are all about promoting private interest over the public interest, self-service over public service, selfishness over altruism, irrationalism over Reason, greed over need, narcissism over respect for others. Right wingers are on the psychopathic spectrum. They invariably love themselves and rail against anyone or any group that seeks to stand up to them and stop the hawk predators from feeding on the innocent, harmless doves.



"If it were necessary to give the briefest possible definition of imperialism, we should have to say that imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism." - Lenin


Capitalist Globalism - making the whole world dance to the Old World Order's economic rule in perpetuity - is the supreme expression of imperialism. Capitalist Globalism is the One World Government that the rich Elite are implementing to ensure that they rule every corner of the globe.


"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." - John Maynard Keynes



"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith



"Capitalism is an organized system to guarantee that greed becomes the primary force of our economic system and allows the few at the top to get very wealthy and has the rest of us riding around thinking we can be that way, too - if we just work hard enough, sell enough Tupperware and Amway products, we can get a pink Cadillac." - Michael Moore


"Capitalism is against the things that we say we believe in - democracy, freedom of choice, fairness. It's not about any of those things now. It's about protecting the wealthy and legalizing greed." - Michael Moore


"The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes


"The great nations have always acted like gangsters, and the small nations like prostitutes." - Stanley Kubrick


The biggest "nation" of all ... the One World system of Global Capitalism, which rules everything ... is the ultimate gangster, and all the rest of us are the prostitutes, begging for money from the Elite while they fuck us up the ass.



Just as Judaism, Christianity and Islam have always been terrorist religions - terrorising people with the threat of the wrath of "God" and eternal pain and suffering in hell - so free-market capitalism has never been anything other than gangsterism, where those with capital point a gun at the head of those without. It's time to stop being the slaves of the Elite. It's time for the people to rule.



Meritocracy Now - the New World Order - the Second Enlightenment




The End of Privilege, the End of Nepotism, the End of Cronyism, the End of Dynastic Wealth and Power







"For all men being originally equal, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honour of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of the hereditary right in kings, is, that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.” - Thomas Paine



"The aristocracy are not the farmers who work the land, and raise the produce, but are the mere consumers of the rent; and when compared with the active world are the drones, a seraglio of males, who neither collect the honey nor form the hive, but exist only for lazy enjoyment.” - Thomas Paine



"Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself, in all cases, as the ages and generation which preceded it. The vanity and presumptions of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies.” - Thomas Paine



Inheritance is the precise mechanism by which the dead tyrannically rule over the living. When you're dead, you're dead. Your wealth does not live on to be inherited by nepotistic scroungers who did nothing to earn it. Inheritance is welfare for rich folk, and no decent person would ever accept it. Inheritance is how the rich control the poor and keep them in their "place". It's how the dead rule from beyond the grave. The dead have no legal rights and no stake in the world of the living. Post mortem transfers of wealth, power and influence must be made illegal via Pro Life legislation, i.e. legislation designed to ensure that corpses cannot dictate the future of the human race via selectively handing on decisive financial advantage to the chosen few (the "Chosen People").


The mission of the rich elites is to set up their families to rule over the rest of us in perpetuity. They call for zero percent inheritance tax, and inheritance is of course the means by which they transmit overwhelming advantage across the generations, how they rig the system, and how they establish the all-powerful cartel from which all the rest of us are excluded if we are fools and cowards enough to go along with it. What is the antidote to dynastic rule, and what is it that the rich elites hate and fear more than anything else? ... it's one hundred percent inheritance tax. Anyone who opposes this tax - the tax that ensures that no dynasty can rule the world via inherited wealth (parasitical wealth, unearned by the deadbeats and dead heads who pathetically grab it because they are incapable of standing on their own two feet and earning their own money by their own sweat and effort) - opposes human progress and freedom. Anyone who resists total inheritance tax supports anti-meritocracy and the dynastic rule of rich elites. We note that all the cretinous conspiracy theorists rage against inheritance tax, and call it "communism" - exactly as required by their rich puppetmasters. Here's the simple truth of the world:



1) Thesis: Free-market Capitalism ... unequal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

2) Antithesis: Communism ... equal opportunities and equal outcomes.



3) Synthesis: Meritocracy ... equal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

Meritocracy is about the smartest, most talented people ... from any background, no matter how humble or disadvantaged ... getting to the top so that the rest of us can benefit from their expertise, intelligence and merit. It's not a question of a rising tide of money raising all boats, but of a rising tide of intelligence and talent.



The proper function of the State is to optimise itself through optimising each and every one of its citizens. It has to maximise the potential of everyone, from any background. The optimal State is the one governed by its smartest and most meritorious citizens - Plato's Philosopher Kings, who are not allowed to accumulate any private wealth and must be devoted entirely to the public good, the opposite of today's rulers of the world.

Every person must be allowed to go as far as their talents take them, and that means they must not be up against a rigged system of privilege, cronyism and nepotism, designed to favour the children of the Elite and to obstruct the progress of everyone else.



Free-market capitalism exists to free the capitalists and enslave everyone else. Aren't you sick of being a slave? Then do something about it. Get off your fucking ass.



No Taxation Without Representation 



The American rebels against British imperial tyranny rightly demanded representation in Parliament. Nowadays, you routinely find American "patriots" demanding the end of government, and its replacement by the market. So, here's a question for all the "patriots" ... given that the markets are run by and for global banks, global corporations, and the global super rich, in what way are the markets accountable to the people? Can we vote the "market" or its controllers out of office? Can we fire any of the big market makers and players? Are we represented on the boards of any of the big market makers and players? Do the ordinary people have any say at all over the market? And, if they don't, isn't that tyranny? The market is tyranny without a face, or the face of the rich carefully hidden behind a faceless abstraction so that we can't see the tyrant stamping on our face


The Divine Conspiracy



What is the Armageddon Conspiracy? It's the Plot to Kill "God" ... the Abrahamic Torture God, the Abrahamic Terrorist God ... The Devil God who orders fathers to murder their own children as a test of slavish, blind obedience.



Illuminati Coded Fiction 

"The Armageddon Conspiracy" by Mike Hockney - the ancient Solomonic plot to kill the Abrahamic God, brought into the twenty-first century.



"The Millionaires' Death Club" by Mike Hockney - no one is safe from the world's smartest, most  glamorous, most stylish elite who will go to any lengths, even murder, to have their "fun".



"Prohibition A" by Mike Hockney - Dante's nine circles of hell are transported to Manhattan for the ultimate game of life and death.



"The Last Bling King" by Mike Hockney - the plot of the elite to own the whole world in perpetuity, and the ingenious counterplot to overthrow them.



The Books of the Revolution 



Have you unlocked the code?


Join the Illuminati Revolution.


The Illuminati - How to Become God


The God Game - Want to Play?




Life from Death by AL


The Movement Reloaded

You are the change in the world. If you don't change, the world won't change.

It's time to undergo your appointed metamorphosis ... from grub to hero, from worm to God.

Change is the basis of everything, and the thing most in need of change isn't the world but always yourself. When you change, you will see the world with brand new eyes, you will see that all things are possible, and you will see a thousand new beginnings.

Step up your game, motherfuckers. Bring your "A" game or don't bother showing up. Who wants the second best, the second rate, the half-hearted, the mediocre?

The Movement wants only the achievers, the talented, those who can make things happen rather than just talking about it or moaning about it.









The Most Forsaken Place in the Universe

In Dante's vision of hell, a vestibule stands between the gates of hell and the river Acheron (the river of woe) where Charon the Boatman ferries the damned across the fast-moving river of pitch-black water to the First Circle of Hell, Hell proper.

As they pass through the vestibule, the souls of the damned encounter a strange sight - the Lost Souls. While the damned don't linger in the vestibule for long - they're just passing through - the group of Lost Souls is trapped there ... forever! These are the souls rejected by both heaven and hell. Heaven shut its gates to them, and hell doesn't want them, so they have nowhere to go. They have no home. They are lost in No Man's Land.

What did they do to suffer this fate? These were the souls that refused to support one side or the other in life - they were the neutrals, the uncommitted, those who lived for themselves, those who joined no cause except their own. They did not choose either good or evil but lived their lives without making any conscious moral choices whatsoever. They were cynical and skeptical, always calculating their personal advantage.

In Christian mythology, when Lucifer's angels rebelled against God, and Michael the Archangel led the loyal angels against them, many angels remained neutral, standing on the sidelines, waiting to see who would win. When God cast down the rebel angels into hell, he made sure he cast down these neutrals too, but they were no more wanted by Satan than by God, so they remained permanently on the near side of hell's river, banned from ever crossing, and equally banned from ever leaving.

Such is the destiny of those who refuse to choose a cause, who refuse to commit, refuse to follow a banner. They are called the Ignavi, and they are the most pathetic and ignoble of all creatures. They are the Last Men, the opposite of the Supermen. They are the feeble, laughable creatures that remain when heaven and hell have received all of the souls they are willing to take.

The Ignavi are the selfish, the self-obsessed, always looking for their own benefit, and never willing to choose a side, never willing to fight, to risk themselves, to make any sacrifices. Their calculation is always the same: let others fight it out and then see how the land lies at the end when the smoke clears. See what opportunities there are to gain profit for themselves ... you know, like free-market capitalists. They are the cowardly "neutrals" who refuse to side with any cause until it's obvious who's winning (i.e. they have no ideological commitment and would support whoever won, thus maximizing their self-interest). Most of humanity belong to the Ignavi, not to the Damned or the Saved. Neither God nor the Devil has anything but contempt for them.

The fate of the Ignavi is a terrible one. They are condemned to run naked forever behind a blank banner (the flag of all those with no cause except themselves), fluttering one way and then another (i.e. never settling into a definite position reflecting a definite cause), and which they can never catch (just as they could never catch a cause in life).

As they chase the flag, they are ceaselessly stung by hornets and wasps. With each sting, blood and putrid matter leak from them, feeding the writhing mass of worms and maggots that they are forced to run across. In life, they refused to be stung by any cause, and now they are stung without end. The worms write bloody, insulting messages in the soil in an unknown script.

The Ignavi's cries of woe are unremitting. The air is continually rent with their shrieks, shouts, screams, and lamentations. Their torment has no end.

"This miserable state [Dante is informed by his guide Virgil] is endured by the dreary souls of those who lived without blame and without praise. They are mixed with the cowardly choir of angels who were not rebellious, nor were loyal to God, but were for themselves. Heaven drove them forth to keep its splendour from being sullied; and the depths of hell receives them not, for the wicked would thus have some glory over them…The world allows no report of them to exist. Mercy and justice disdain them. Do not speak of them, but look and pass on."

"I looked and saw a whirling banner that went by so quickly that it seemed it would never pause; and behind it came so long a train of people that I should never have believed death had undone so many … These wretches, who were never truly alive, were naked and viciously stung by wasps and hornets that made their faces stream with blood, which, mixed with their tears, dripped to their feet, and disgusting maggots collected in the pus." - Dante

Well, will Heaven and Hell alike deny you entry? What is your sacred cause? What moral decisions have you taken? How have you ever served anyone or anything other than yourself? Are you fated to reside in the Ante-Inferno for all time? This barren, hopeless place is within the perimeter of hell, yet not truly part of it. It's Neverland.

Being pious, Dante tells us, is more than a matter of simply not sinning. Unlike the non-committal souls, you must actively practise virtue and side with the righteous. You have to be on the right side, not the wrong one, and not in the neutral, agnostic middle. You must make a leap. You must choose and commit.


The Great Refusal

"I hate journalists. There is nothing in them but tittering jeering emptiness. They have all made what Dante calls the Great Refusal. The shallowest people on the ridge of the earth." - W.B. Yeats

Are you one of the great refusers, one of the cynical, sneering trolls - the utterly empty, blank, pointless people who have nothing constructive to offer the world?

The Falsehood

"That which has always been accepted by everyone, everywhere, is almost certain to be false." - Paul Valery

The Blank Banner

Are you a follower of the blank banner of the Ignavi, the most pathetic flag there can possibly be? The blank banner is for all empty, non-committal souls. It's for those who backed no clear side, supported no clear leader, and simply ran back and forth with no direction, other than their own comfort and advantage. There is nothing worse and more dismal than to be a follower of this banner.

If you have chosen no sacred cause in life, if you haven't chosen sides, the blank banner is YOUR banner.

Since they were neither good nor evil, the Ignavi have no place in the afterlife. They might as well never have existed. They were pointless people who made no impression. Is that you too?

Ante-hell, the vestibule of hell, is also called "Nowhere". It's the eternal home of the Ignavi, the most pathetic souls of all, the souls that ought never to have existed, those that made no choices in life, "who lived a life but lived it with no blame and no praise". It includes those agnostics too self-absorbed to make choices, those who were neither hot nor cold on important matters. They neither believed nor disbelieved, neither knew nor didn't know, neither blasphemed nor opposed the blasphemers, neither stood for free speech nor against it.

Now, they run about the hills of Ante-Hell forever, having no hope of dying to end their misery, doing nothing but chasing banners (causes) they will never catch.

You are not saved because you have done nothing wrong. You must do something right. You must choose. You must leap one way or another. You must commit.

The worst places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintained their neutrality, who sat on the face and refused to take part. Are you one of those who will dwell permanently on the edge of hell?

Life isn't a spectator sport. You must be involved.


The Bronze Jars

In some tellings, the Ignavi ended up inside bronze jars, scattered about the vestibule's great plain of mud and dirt. The voices of those trapped inside the jars could be faintly heard through the walls of the jars, but not enough to be intelligible, although it was assumed they were begging to be helped, or to be put out of their misery once and for all.

Because these people chose no cause, they don't deserve to be heard. They are voiceless to the rest of the world. Is that you? Or is your voice that of the pointless troll with nothing positive to say, who does nothing but snipe at others to big himself up?

The River Acheron

Any soul that has any physical contact whatsoever with the River Acheron is trapped forever in that infernal, cursed river, indescribably cold and bleak. These helpless and hopeless souls are fully aware but unable to move. Is that like your life?

The Gate of Hell

Above the Gate of Hell is a foreboding inscription on the lintel, saying that this is the way to the city of desolation and eternal sorrow, of hopeless suffering and punishment, but created out of divine justice:










The Arch of Hell

Once you enter hell, you never again see anything of the outside world. In hell, there is no sun. Nothing shines at all. There is no light. There is only "darkness visible", as Milton put it.


Between heaven and hell is "Nowhere" - the vestibule of hell, the place of all the Nobody People, the No Men of No Man's Land. This is where all the agnostic, non-committal, neutral people, all those who failed or refused to make any choices in life, must now run around forever looking for something to cling to, to commit to, to have as a cause.

The Demons

Face up to your demons and they'll vanish before you know it! Refuse to do so, and they will haunt you forever.

The New Zombies

"Had an interesting dream/nightmare about the zombie apocalypse. The zombies were intelligent, and the more people they ate, the more intelligent they got. And they hunted out the most intelligent. The stupid people were just snacks/junk food. I was running around with a group of random people trying to outsmart these mega intelligent zombies! Arrggaaagh!" - SB


The Failure of the West

The West is being destroyed by its own lack of purpose and values, by its toxic liberalism and negative libertarianism, by its catastrophic avoidance of producing an identity in its citizens. "Going shopping" is not an identity. Voting every few years for someone you dislike less than some other guy isn't an identity.

People find an identity in a sacred cause, and the two main drivers of the West - capitalist materialism and scientific materialism - both flee from sacred causes as fast as they can.

They equally characterize reality as meaningless, purposeless, pointless, trivial, materialistic ... as being all about soulless commodities, soulless things, soulless people, and the soulless profit principle (available to only a tiny soulless ruling elite). Life is about objects, things, drones, drudges, dreary jobs.

"Life is shit and then you die" is the inescapable message. Even people are objectified and made into commodities to be bought and sold in the market. As for science, it almost literally denies that people have minds and free will.

Both Communism and Nazism gave people an identity. The Nazis loved being Nazis. It filled them with purpose, meaning, pride, and a glorious vision of the future. In today's world, Islam offers a glorious image to its radicalised followers, and those fanatics are always those most disillusioned with the West and what it has to offer. They are total failures in the world of capitalist democracy and scientific materialism, so why wouldn't they look to something else to give them hope?

The West is dying because of its cynicism, scepticism, agnosticism, atheism, nihilism, liberalism, political correctness, scientific materialism and capitalism - which all go together as a dreadful, despairing, grim vision of a soulless universe devoid of any value and purpose whatsoever. The West is nothing but a "dark Satanic mill", as Blake put it.

As Nietzsche said, we must revalue all values. We can only beat mad religions by replacing them with better, more rational religions ... and that's exactly what Illuminism provides.

The West will fail totally unless it can regain its spirit, and that means finding religion again, but this time Logos rather than Mythos religion.

Forget the old Gods. Humans themselves are the new Gods ... if they did but know it!

Nietzsche said that God is dead. Well, it's time for him to be reincarnated ... in us!

Charlie Hebdo

The most salient fact about the Charlie Hebdo atrocity is that not a single Islamic nation on earth, nor any Islamic community, has its version of Charlie Hebdo. Islam has NO satire. It's a humour-free zone. You simply can't have comedy and satire in an Islamic context ... and that's why Charlie Hebdo was wiped out. Humour itself is offensive and Satanic to Muslims. If humour were important to them, they would have Islamic Charlie Hebdos ... but no Muslim would dare to make jokes about Islam, and if you can't make a joke of your own religion, you can't make a joke of anything else either.

What is the Islamic Hell? ... it's the Charlie Hebdo office! Laughter is what you'll never hear in the Muslim heaven, and who but a humourless psycho would want to go there?!

Ayatollah Khomeini said, "Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious." There you have it - straight from the horse's mouth. Islam has no clowns, but it seems to the rest of the world that every Muslim is a clown ... or a terrorist.

The Fool

"It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults of others and to forget his own." - Cicero

We have many critics who ought to study Cicero!



The God of Failure

If the people of a town that was about to be struck by a tornado all gathered together and prayed to God to spare them - with the effect that the tornado was miraculously diverted - one could understand why people believed in God. Yet people are actually at their most religious when a tornado, or whatever, has made a direct hit and large numbers of people have died. In other words, God is rewarded for his spectacular failure to save life, and, in fact, for his equally spectacular success in taking life!

People are perverse. With science, humanity can point to countless great successes that it has brought about (albeit on the back of mathematics); with religion, humanity can't point to even one success. When has God ever accomplished anything anywhere? Anything good, that is. His failures and crimes against humanity are, however, legion. Why is it that believers refuse to see that they are worshipping the Devil? The Devil's greatest trick isn't to convince you that he doesn't exist, but to make you fanatically certain that he's God!


It's not at all surprising that the pay and bonuses of Wall Street CEOs go up as the performance of their banks and corporations go down. Human beings love and celebrate powerful beings who are absolutely useless, and, in fact, extremely dangerous.


In countries such as America and Britain, income disparities between the richest and poorest are staggeringly high. These disparities will allow the privileged, rich elite to use their power, wealth and influence to rule these countries indefinitely.

Every country should by law have a mechanism for rebasing wealth: for resetting wealth back to the same level for everyone. This mechanism is 100% inheritance tax. No one's wealth can extend beyond their own lifetime.

Bright by FF

"It's a representation of the Celtic goddess Brigitte (Bright). I resonate more with her, because she is more of an androgynous deity and embodies both light and darkness. It is also about the journey towards oneself. Her own shadow stands between her and and her own temple, the temple of enlightenment. Brigitte looks like she knows where she's going, but also a little bit confused, like someone unknown called her name. The shadow is partially behind her, suggesting that she is not totally aware of it. I see the shadow as the representation of the unresolved, attracting the unpredictable that delays our journey towards self-fulfillment." - FF

"Come one, come all for a role in history
To bring about a perfected meritocracy
To expel mythos religions of superstitious hokus pokus
And usher in a logos religion of mathematics and gnosis
It has been man's destiny since the beginning of time,
To explain life's mysteries through reason and rhyme
To strip the power from the evil controllers
And bring about enlightenment devoid of "holy rollers"
We are a fresh restart for a frozen resistance computed
Activists and revolutionaries, the movement rebooted
We are fighting a war for ultimate equality
A philosophical battle for a divine society
The solution is one hundred percent inheritance tax
So that the economic infrastructure shall be optimized to the max
The time is now for the second enlightenment
A time to embrace the collective God of Illumination,
" - TB


Sacred Cause by VL


"It is a Pallas Athene/Minerva style owl. The owl sits atop a book which signifies knowledge, laurel branches surround it and PMCV means Per Me Caeci Vident (Through me the blind become sighted)." - VL


Mathematics In Itself

Mathematics in itself is the absence of emotion, of sensations, of mystical intuitions. It's pure, noumenal, ontological reason, pure rational Form. It's the furthest thing from the human condition, hence the most frightening and daunting thing to humans, and the thing they least understand. Mathematics in itself is the greatest mystery of all for the feeble human mind. You need to be a God to be good enough for math!

The Zeroth Dimension

The zero dimension is mind. Matter is the non-zero dimension. The zero dimension is light. Broken light is the non-zero dimension. What could be simpler? But materialists will never understand this.

The Race

"Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe." - H. G. Wells

Rational education, not Eastern meditation, or New Age "love", or scientific materialism, will save the world.

The Most Exclusive Club on Earth

What is the most exclusive club on Earth? No amount of money will get you into this club, no amount of privilege, no amount of "fine breeding", no amount of "blue blood". The right private schools and elite colleges and universities won't help you. The right school or college tie will avail you nothing. The right family, the right connections - they are all useless to you. Why? Because the most exclusive club on Earth is that of human genius, and to be a genius you must have talent so exceptional it makes you one in a billion.

Moving On

Are you smart enough to move on from religion, spiritualism and science ... to ontological mathematics? There's nowhere after ontological mathematics. It's the end of the line.




The Hollywood Doctrine

Make 'em laugh, make 'em cry.

If it bleeds, it leads.

There's a sucker born every day.

Build it and they will come.

The bigger the better.

The same but different.

Bread and circuses.

The Event.

The Spectacle.

The Society of the Spectacle.


It's said that children are only a couple of clicks away from hardcore porn. Well, they are even fewer clicks away from hardcore Abrahamism, and, in fact, they get this stuffed down their mouths at school. They get fucked up the ass with it, face fucked and cream pied. Porn could never be more damaging than Abrahamism! 


Deconstructing the Dialogue by VL

The Rich Man's Con

Capitalism = the power of private elites, the privately wealthy.

Democracy = the power of the people, the Commonwealth.

Democracy was introduced in ancient Athens precisely to overthrow rule by the private elites (oligarchs) and replace it with public rule. What, then, are we to make of a concept such as capitalist democracy - the only type of democracy allowed in the modern world? In other words, what happens when you have a system based on the combination of private and public power? Since the private and public can't both be in charge, what you get is the reality of private power and the illusion of public power.

What is a presidential election? It's the phoniest of all spectacles, the Grand Illusion, the occasion when the sham of people power is most pathetically demonstrated. The common herd - the sheeple - go to the election booths and pretend to elect their leader, and, all the while, the real leaders - the bankers, the CEOs, the super rich ("Wall Street") - are never up for election, are never accountable to the people, and can never be removed by the people ... except through Revolution.

The ancient Athenian oligarchs were overthrown because they were publicly in charge, and their vileness was absolutely obvious to the people. But the rich learned their lesson. Today, in capitalist democracies, the rich oligarchs are in even greater charge than they ever were in ancient Athens. Now, however, their rule is not public and overt, but private and covert. They stand invisibly behind "markets". No one can see them. No one can identify them. No one can discover what they're up to. Like "God", the market works in "mysterious ways". Now, the oligarchs are the puppetmasters, and the people are allowed to elect only the puppets.

Capitalist democracy is the perfect con trick, the supreme hustle. The rich have got exactly what they desire - permanent rule. The only price they had to pay was to make it appear as if the people were in charge.

Capitalist democracy was how the rich oligarchs solved the dialectic of private versus public rule. They ruled, but they pretended that the people ruled, and that was good enough to fool the dumb masses.

The rich oligarchs have created a false consciousness for the people - relentlessly spread and reinforced through the oligarchs' omnipresent, 24/7 media machine.

Remember, to dupe the stupid, all you are required to do is give them fake control, the appearance of control, but no actual control, and you can rule them as absolutely as you ever did under monarchs, emperors, tyrants and dictators.

Capitalist "democracies" enshrine the Dictatorship of the Oligarchs. You know nothing about politics and economics if you haven't worked that out.

The very first action required in any true democracy is to ensure that the people do indeed rule, and not any hidden entity that subverts the public good and commonwealth in favour of the private good and private wealth. Capitalism is the exact means by which the private elites sabotage democracy and ensure that they, and not the people, are in charge.

All capitalist democracies have a fundamental issue to address - the separation of capitalism and democracy - since they cannot possibly co-exist. All right-wingers and all anarcho-capitalist libertarians call for the State to be shrunk, preferably to no size at all, i.e. to vanish from existence. The market, they say, should control everything. Well, there's no need for democracy in such a system, no need for elections. The market will decide all, and the "market" means the banks, the corporations and the super rich, i.e. the privately wealthy.

In Ayn Rand's "utopia", the private elite rule forever, and the people must do what the market dictates. This is a quintessential dictatorship with only one ingredient missing. In place of a Hitler or Stalin, you get a faceless, anonymous, inscrutable, abstract "market". Yet its power is everywhere, controlling everything.

It must be understood that all supporters of Ayn Rand, free-market capitalism and anarcho-capitalist libertarianism seek the abolition of democracy and the State, and its replacement by disconnected, atomised individuals serving the market alone.

If that's not what you want, if you wish the people to be in charge, then you have no option but to call for the end of the rule of private elites. That means the end of private banking (to be replaced by public banking, run by the State), and the end of vast private corporations that openly defy the public good and work solely for private interests (to be replaced by public corporations serving the Commonwealth). It means the end of private, predatory capitalism and its replacement by public, productive capitalism for the social good.

With "social capitalism", as opposed to free-market capitalism, the State is in charge, operating on behalf of the Commonwealth, rather than private elites operating on behalf of themselves. All bankers and CEOs of large corporations are therefore publicly appointed and accountable officials. Like generals in the army, all of them can be fired by the People.

The central question of politics has never changed. Who should rule ... the people or the private elites?

The power of the private elites can be destroyed forever by a single tax - 100% inheritance tax. If the rich can't pass on their wealth, the rule of the dynastically wealthy is automatically ended.

So, whose side are you on - that of the people, or of the private elites? You can't be on both sides. You must choose once and for all. Damned be the deed half done!

The farce of capitalist democracy must end. Either the people must rule or the rich elites must rule without pretence. Well, which is it to be? The Phoney War is over.


The State = the public sector, the Commonwealth, the People.

The Anti-State = the private sector, private wealth, the Rich Elite.

Which side are you on?

Who are the people who most oppose and undermine the State, and call for it to be shrunk or abolished ? - the Rich Elite, the 1%!! Well, are you with the 99%, or against them? Your choice.

The Capitalist Fundamentalists

DH: "An unjust income gap does exist but that is largely due to crony capitalism and not true capitalism. I'm opposed to an income cap or any of these measures because it is not a meritocracy. You reap what you sow. You're going to take away somebody else's money in the form of income cap. How is that meritocracy? And if people truly were enlightened they wouldn't pay so much for ridiculous services and things. No amount of government bureaucracy and management is going to stop idiotic behaviour. In fact, more often than not, it seems to increase it. The government can't even manage a post office and you want to give them more control? The meritocracy I often hearing being spoken of sounds a lot like the wolf in sheep's clothing."

In 2008, capitalism died. Of course, capitalists refuse to accept this. So, they claim that it was "crony" capitalism rather than "true" capitalism that failed. Yet "crony capitalism" and "true capitalism" are identical. There is no such thing as capitalism that isn't about cronies, nepotism, privilege, cartels, inheritance, corruption, intimidation, oligopolies and monopolies. Adam Smith, one of capitalism's greatest champions, said, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty or justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary."

All failed ideologies never accept their failure. They always lay the blame on some "impure", non-fundamentalist version of their ideology, and call for renewed purity and fundamentalism. Not one "true" capitalist has ever explained how the only form of capitalism that the world experiences is "crony" capitalism. Who are the "true" capitalists who aren't totally in bed with crony capitalists, and up to their neck in crony capitalism? Can even one be identified?

Warm and Cold

The world comprises warm and cold people. Left wingers are warm and support the public good. Right wingers are cold and support private interest. They openly despise the Commonwealth and the Collective. Their clearest voice is that of Ayn Rand, the deranged anti-Bolshevik atheist who insanely claimed that selfishness is virtuous. You would need to be as insane as she was to agree with her.


M by WS



Zombie Politics

Capitalist democracy constitutes zombie politics. The democratic voters are zombie electors - the political undead - simply going through the motions.


The "Big" Problem

Why are so many people so discontented with the world? The central problem is a surprising one - scale. The scale of things has just got too big for most people, too frightening and alienating, too abstract and impersonal, too uncaring and callous.

Consider the history of human society, and its changing sense of scale.

Humanity begins with individuals. Individuals get together through friendship, lust, romance, mutual interest, common goals, and so on. Individuals produce families, which are an extension of the individual. Then come tribes, gangs, common interest groups, which are an extension of the family, and then villages and towns which are an extension of tribes, and then city states which are extensions of villages and towns. Then we have nation states, which are extensions of city-states, and, lastly, globalism, which is the final extension.

Human beings are designed by evolution for existence in tribes and villages. Evolution never anticipated the internet, airplanes, cell phones, cars, trains, ships, vast cities, and so on. How is the primitive human mind supposed to cope? The fact is ... it doesn't. People are always trying to recreate smaller groups, with which they can identify.

Social networking may be vast as a whole, involving billions of people, but most people belong to networks with just a few hundred other people. "Dunbar's Number" dictates the scale of these groups. Wikipedia says, "Dunbar's number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships. These are relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person. This number was first proposed by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who found a correlation between primate brain size and average social group size. By using the average human brain size and extrapolating from the results of primates, he proposed that humans can only comfortably maintain 150 stable relationships. Proponents assert that numbers larger than this generally require more restrictive rules, laws, and enforced norms to maintain a stable, cohesive group. It has been proposed to lie between 100 and 250, with a commonly used value of 150. Dunbar's number states the number of people one knows and keeps social contact with, and it does not include the number of people known personally with a ceased social relationship, nor people just generally known with a lack of persistent social relationship, a number which might be much higher and likely depends on long-term memory size.

"Dunbar theorized that 'this limit is a direct function of relative neocortex size, and that this in turn limits group size ... the limit imposed by neocortical processing capacity is simply on the number of individuals with whom a stable inter-personal relationship can be maintained.' On the periphery, the number also includes past colleagues, such as high school friends, with whom a person would want to reacquaint themself if they met again."

Human happiness revolves around Dunbar's Number, and not the seven billion people (and growing!) that comprise the total population of the world.

People divide themselves into family units, teams, societies, clubs, gangs, tribes, and so on, on a scale compatible with Dunbar's number. Millions and billions don't come into it in any practical way.

A happy world is a world of appropriate scale, and that's what the human race has lost. We are constantly told that bigger is better rather than small is beautiful. Who's saying this? Well, the globalists - the capitalists - who want to sell their products everywhere, and thus be as rich, powerful and influential as possible. Yet, even the globalists are a small gang. They like to keep their wealth, power and influence in the family - via inheritance - and amongst their networks of friends and cronies, people who all swim in the same cultural pool of privilege. They don't want any scumbag outsiders crashing the party. So, they are globalists in only one sense - money and power - yet they are Dunbar localists in every other way, keeping everything within a small, known group of trusted and loyal confederates (fellow conspirators!).

The globalists have done something astonishing without anyone noticing. They have taken control of the nation states and made them their puppets. All nation states now dance to the globalist tune. When nation states elect new governments, the new kids on the block are immediately locked into a system where they have to obey banks, corporations, markets and privileged elites, i.e. external, unelected, unaccountable forces that are far more powerful than any nation state, and to which no nation state can stand up. No matter what kind of government anyone in any nation state elects, they will always be ruled by the globalists, and not those for whom they actually voted. That is the secret of "capitalist democracy". The people vote for democracy (people power) but get global capitalism (the power of private elites and oligarchies). There's no such thing as true democracy in a globalist, capitalist world.

The nation state has died without anyone noticing. All nation states are now imprisoned in a global system over which they have no power. To challenge global power, all nation states would have to act together against the global elite, but since the global elite are the ones who give you your "democratic" leaders, that's never going to happen. The three most powerful "democrats" in Britain are David Cameron (Prime Minister), George Osborne (Chancellor) and Boris Johnson (Mayor of London). All three were members of the elite, exclusive, ultra-privileged Bullingdon Club at Oxford University.

Cameron and Johnson both went to Eton College, the most elite private school in the world. Osborne went to St Paul's, number 3 most elite private school in the world. Nick Clegg, Britain's deputy prime minister went to Westminster (No. 2 elite private school in the world) and Cambridge University. Ed Miliband, Leader of the Opposition in Britain, went to Oxford University. Ed Miliband, Ed Balls (shadow Chancellor) and David Cameron all studied the same degree (PPE: philosophy, politics and economics) at Oxford University.

How dumb do you have to be to think that there is any democracy at all in a country ruled by these people? The whole thing is rigged from the outset. It's a private club, and it's getting worse and worse as more money, power and influence is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands via globalism, privilege, cronyism, nepotism, inheritance and dynastic marriage. Wake up!

What's the cure? It's time to smash the nation state and thus globalism. The only globalism that could ever be accepted is the meritocratic New World Order envisaged in Star Trek.

We must replace the nation state with an earlier form: the city-state (of about a million people), or a small nation (of about five million people, as in Scotland).

Dunbar's Number and Dogs

Such is the perversity of the human condition that people with dogs value them more than human strangers. Dogs count as part of people's Dunbar Number - their closest acquaintances.


In history, war and revolution killed off local elites. Local elites were seeable and killable. But how do you defeat an unseen, far distant, global elite? How do you defeat an abstract "market"?

Project Fear

To stop Scotland from breaking away from the UK, the UK government launched "Project Fear", designed to terrify the Scottish electorate into voting to stay within the Union. The Bank of England warned of dire financial consequences if Scotland voted for independence. Several large corporations said they would leave the country, costing many thousands of jobs. Supermarkets said prices would rise steeply. Market analysts claimed the Scottish economy would collapse. And so on. Who elected any of these doom mongers? In what way were any of them accountable to the Scottish people? Why were these capitalists allowed to interfere in the vote of the Scottish People? This, of course, proves that there's no such thing as democracy. At any time, the "free" people can be threatened by capitalists and forced to do the bidding of the capitalists. It's plainly not the people who are in charge, but the capitalists. How can that be allowed to continue?

Project Hope

Nothing could have been more daunting and terrifying than the enormous English army that faced the tiny Scottish force at Bannockburn in 1314, yet the Scots won the field. That's what happens when an ingenious, meritocratic, brave people dares to be free, to have the highest hopes and ambitions, and will let nothing stop it.

Everything and Nothing

They get everything and you get nothing. How long will you tolerate it?

The Beautiful World

"Bigger is Better" versus "Small is Beautiful"

Global capitalism is all about the former, social capitalism about the latter. We have to smash international, globalist banks, and enormous multinational corporations. Every entity that can dictate to the State must be abolished. No private entity should be "too big to fail". Every entity that can dictate to the people without being accountable to the people must be abolished. Everything must be on a local scale, capitalism above all. "Social capitalism" means small, localist capitalism. It's all about small businesses and enterprises, not about vast leviathans that have higher incomes than nation states.

Fading Away

Are you one of the people who wants to fade into the background, to be anonymous, to be part of the crowd, to never influence this world you live in? Do you want global banks and corporations to tell you how to lead your life? No? Well do something about it! Stop supporting the farce of capitalist democracy. It's the inversion of true democracy, as any ancient Athenian could have told you. Democracy was designed to control the private elites and bring them under public power. Capitalist democracy is designed to control the public and bring them under private power, while at the same time pretending that the people are in charge.

The Inspiration

Inspired by the Scottish Independence Referendum, a quarter of Americans were reported to want their states to secede from the USA. This is the future. All lumbering, giant states will collapse under their own contradictions. The world can and must return to a sensible political scale, where the local people are truly in charge of their local environment, as they were in ancient Athens, where all citizens were expected to be active citizens, directly involved in the governance of their city-state.

The Democratic Deficit

The modern Western world purports to be all about choice, self-expression, individualism, personal liberty, freedom from oppression, and so on. However, this ideology is fundamentally at odds with another central pillar of the Western World, namely democracy. Democracy says that you can freely choose to vote for whomever you like. So far, so good. However, it then makes a crucial second statement: if you are outvoted, you can get things you definitely didn't vote for, things you might even despise.

Imagine wanting an Apple Smartphone and then being forced to take a Samsung Smartphone because of a vote, or wanting to see movie X and being forced to watch movie Y because you got outvoted. You are emphatically not getting what you chose. You do not feel free.

"Capitalist Democracy" is generating more and more cognitive dissonance in people. It's making them frustrated and angry. In all consumerist aspects of life, people get what they want, what they pay for. But this does not apply to the political regimes that rule them. You can easily get the opposite of what you want and what you voted for.

It's increasingly obvious that people will no longer accept this. They're used to getting their own way, and politics can no longer deliver. Anarcho-capitalist libertarians want to do away with democratic government, leaving nothing but capitalist free markets and consumerism. This is entirely logical for fanatical capitalists. But what about people who hate capitalism and its "ethics" of total selfishness, greed and materialism?

The world now has to accept that democracy has failed. Democracy can't give all of the people what they want. It can only give those who won the election what they want, and even they are served imperfectly. No Democrat, for example, could honestly rate what Obama has done for America, despite his impeccable Democratic credentials. We must now look to a future of post-democratic politics where people get what they want rather than what they didn't vote for.

We need a grand alliance of everyone to think about how we can all get what we want without enslaving others. The only way to do this is through breaking up nation states into states and city-states, each with a particular identity that everyone in that small state or city-state chooses and agrees with. In the future, we will all choose exactly what political regime we live under. Let's make it happen!


Zygmunt Bauman summarised the paradox of our era as: "Never have we been so free. Never have we felt so powerless."

In democracies, we are asked to vote for the least worst party, the least worst candidate, the least worst option. What kind of system is that? If you're not voting for the best, you shouldn't want to vote at all!


"The idea that voting is pointless, democracy a façade, and that no one is representing ordinary people is more resonant than ever as I leave my ordinary town behind. Amidst the guilt and anger I feel in the back of the Führer-mobile, there is hope. Whilst it's clear that on an individual, communal, and global level that radical change is necessary, I feel a powerful, transcendent optimism. I know change is possible, I know there is an alternative, because I live a completely different life to the one I was born with. I also know that the solution is not fame or money or any transient adornment of the individual. The only Revolution that can really change the world is the one in your own consciousness, and mine has already begun." - Russell Brand

Votes are placebos. They are designed to make voters feel good, to give them a psychological boost. But they have no active ingredient.


Value honour and glory over money and possessions. Stop complaining, stop being lazy. Get active. Change things. Make an impact on the world. Live a life that others will admire.


Elective Dictatorship

In the UK general election of 2005, the turnout was 61.36%, i.e. nearly 40% of eligible voters declined to participate. The victorious Labour Party received 62.4% of the seats in the House of Commons. The total vote they received of all those eligible to vote was a mere 24.2%. So a political party that represented less than a quarter of the electorate gained a massive parliamentary majority. In what way does that constitute "democracy"? If seventy-five percent of the electorate are forced to endure policies they didn't vote for, and to which they gave no mandate, isn't that a dictatorship rather than a democracy?

What a Beautiful World

"Think about the world you live in. Think of beautiful, sweet, rustic-smelling forests, and sparkling rivers, dancing against the boulders they rush over. Think of little swirling seashells, and plants that are growing in fractals - how mathematically elegant they are! Think of music that inspires you; music whose vibrations resonate with your own, whose composition and lyrics elevate your soul. Think of awe-inspiring art that draws you in and makes you a small part of it. Think of a warm smile of your loved one, and their eyes that radiate love. Think of a historical figure, a hero, whose bravery and sacrifice for others motivates you to get out of your comfort zone. We live in a fascinating world and you can recognize beauty everywhere around you by merely opening up your eyes.

"Unfortunately, this beauty is being overshadowed by ignorance. Instead of embracing and actively fighting to protect the beauty around them, the majority of people drift through life, without much thought, absorbing what is being fed to them through the mainstream media. They don't have opinions of their own, and most of the time they don't even have independent thoughts. Eventually they become so mired in this cheap, fast produced culture, which caters to the lowest common denominator, that they can no longer tell apart quality and beauty from primitive entertainment and madness.

"The majority of world's population is very far from fulfilling their potential. Instead, they are ignorant of their true purpose in life due to various distractions: boss overloading them with work, spouse is not happy that they spend so little time together, kids misbehaving, their car needs repair again - the list is endless. This is where The Movement steps in. The Movement recognizes that to improve the world we live in, first we need to help improve individual lives around us. That means we need to educate those who are ready and willing to listen and learn, so that they can finally take charge of their lives and positively contribute to society. Remember that no man or woman can improve their lives unless they are determined to do so themselves. You cannot force improvement upon them; they have to consciously work towards that goal.

"There are many separate groups working within the Movement. There are small cells and sole individuals working on projects to help spread the knowledge and the values of Meritocracy. I work in a small cell, in which we are dedicated to exposing the socially, economically, politically and psychologically detrimental ways of the Old World Order (OWO) and to promoting knowledge and thought. Our goal is, through education, to plant the seeds of revolution in peoples' hearts and to lead them in the united front of Meritocracy, Round-Table psychology and Illuminism. We aim to outsmart the OWO by introducing ideas that will make their systems obsolete. As Buckminster Fuller said, 'You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.'

"All members of the said cell are expected to possess the virtues of a great leader:

Devotion - to our cause and fellow team members.

Courage - to challenge status quo, and to be free and original.

Resourcefulness - to find quick and clever ways to overcome difficulties.

Ambition - determination and motivation to work hard in order to achieve our goals.

Temperance - abstinence from things that impair our physical, mental or spiritual health.

Fortitude - strength in the face of adversity.

Justice - just behaviour and treatment of others.

Prudence - carefulness and thoughtfulness for the future.

Devotion - to our cause and fellow team members.

"The cell that I work with is just one of the groups that adopted the Movement ideas as described in this website. If you don't think you are a good match for us, but you still want to contribute to the Movement, you can either join another such organization, work solo, or establish a new Movement group. If you choose the latter, please first make sure that you understand well what Meritocracy stands for, and have read extensively on the subject, including its antithesis: democracy/dumbocracy and free market capitalism (crapitalism). If you are currently a member of a group that just debates various questions, plans various campaigns, jumping from one idea to the other, never producing or achieving anything - leave it! You are just wasting your time there.

"If you choose to work by yourself or gather a small group and work with them, remember that it is much better to have a small goal, work towards it and achieve it, rather than have a big goal (or many goals), start working on it, then lose interest and consequently fail. In order to achieve any major goal you'll have to complete a series of tasks and projects anyway. So start by picking one task of one small project, stick to it, and follow through to completion. The worst thing you can do is pick one project, then drop it, then pick another, then another and another. A year after, you would have wasted this whole time and achieved absolutely nothing! (Note that setting up a Facebook group with 600, or however many members, by itself is not an achievement, unless you have produced something that had an impact outside of your group). Instead, you could have spent your time more wisely if you had read a good book or two - educating yourself about current affairs, philosophy, history, psychology, etc. If you don't think that you'll be able to stick to a project and complete it, then you should spend your time reading and educating yourself about serious matters. Actually, a lot of people within The Movement circles want to contribute and help, but they don't know where to start, so they seek guidance. To them I say: you can make a tremendous contribution just by reading serious books and educating yourselves. There are many culturally-priceless books discussed and mentioned on the AC site. The Movement's goal is to have an educated, enlightened world, so it is always best to start with yourself. 'Be the change you want to see in the world,' said Mahatma Ghandi.

"Do whatever gets you fired up. And don't just go half way - give it your all!" - NK


The "Royal" Family?

"Why is it important to take down the British Royal family? Before the United States, the British Empire was the World's Superpower. The British Royal family is what's left of it. This family is a worldwide symbol of all the evils of today's world, including: inequality, excessive wealth, privilege, masters ruling over slaves (the people of the UK aren't citizens but "subjects"), 'the good Christian family', mediocrity (no talent), the list goes on. By demolishing this family we can start a new wave of change. It can be just as electrifying as the American and French Revolutions. Most British people have a lot of respect for the Queen… don't ask me why... but they hate prince Charles, who is first in the line after the Queen dies. This will represent a great opportunity to abolish the monarchy." - NK


The "Old" Obstacle

"As children under the age of 18 (in some countries under 16) are not allowed to vote due to their lack of knowledge and experience, so should retired people lose their right to vote on the account that they gave up their responsibilities as citizens - they stopped working, hence stopped contributing to the society. Why should people, that are literally waiting to die, be allowed to make decisions that will adversely impact the younger generations, but will make little difference to those same pensioners in the little time they have left? You might say: because pensioners have extensive life experience. That might be so, but in general, after people retire, they become detached from the newest trends and the zeitgeist (spirit of the day). Only the elderly who continue working and thus contributing to the society should be allowed to vote.

"Consider the Scottish Referendum. Nearly three quarters (73%) of those aged 65 or over voted 'No' (not to separate), 59% of those aged between 25 and 34 voted 'Yes' (to separate) and 71% of those aged 16 or 17 also voted 'Yes'. Considering that 17.4% of Scottish population are 65 and over, if pensioners were not allowed to vote, we are likely to have had a free, independent Scotland right now. [Figures taken from the Lord Ashcroft Polls on Scottish Independence].

"The problem with retired people is that they are incredibly risk averse and progress averse. They are scared of change, because they are incapable of adapting to it. Evolution, with few exceptions, guarantees it. Timothy Leary suggests that throughout their lifetimes people were able to activate several brain circuits, but once they reached 40 the great majority of them stayed at the same level for the rest of their lives. The older they get, the more they cling to the 'good old good ways', because that's what they know best. If they were to accept progress, it would mean that they could no longer sustain their comfy power-positions that most of them are in now.

"Once pensioners are no longer be allowed to halt progress, society will start advancing at an incredible rate. New advanced, rational laws will start being passed. Even the legislative system will become more transparent - making it work for the wider population, not just a few fat cats who protect their dirty, cash-cow businesses." - NK

MH: It's true that people over 40 have a disturbing tendency to become set in their ways, and to turn into reactionary conservatives, following an obstructive right-wing agenda. They become obsessed with inheritance ... with passing on their wealth to their children, and fuck everyone else. The old are those most fanatically opposed to 100% inheritance tax, hence are the biggest obstacle to a meritocratic society of equal opportunities. Their experience, such as it is, has usually become obsolete and irrelevant. The changing world has passed them by. Would the "experience" of old men and women from the Stone Age count for anything in today's world?

Experience is not something by which you should set much store. Reason, intelligence, knowledge, will, drive, ambition and adaptability are enormously more important. You have to be able to change and move with the times.

The function of the State should not only be to optimise the under 40s, but also the over 40s, to keep their minds fresh, active, adaptable, still capable of learning and growing. We don't want over 40s to become dinosaurs and fossils. You should be bright and active until the day you die. People in great jobs, jobs they love, don't want to retire. Retirement is a rehearsal for death.


"The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom." - H.L. Mencken

Age has the unfortunate tendency to turn people into old fools, prattling on about their redundant "experience" as if it counts for shit.

"With age comes wisdom, but sometimes age comes alone." - Oscar Wilde

The old are rarely wise. They're usually just old. The only elderly people you should listen to are those who are young at heart, who are still full of energy, with flexible minds, capable of learning new things. People like that actually learn from their experiences, and keep learning, and can pass on genuine wisdom.

"You have to push as hard as the age that pushes against you." - Flannery O'Connor

"I don't believe one grows older. I think that what happens early on in life is that at a certain age one stands still and stagnates." - T. S. Eliot

"Old men ought to be explorers." - T. S. Eliot

"As we grow older, the world becomes stranger." - T. S. Eliot

"Where is the Life we have lost in living?" - T. S. Eliot

"Do not let me hear

Of the wisdom of old men, but rather of their folly,

Their fear of fear and frenzy, their fear of possession,

Of belonging to another, or to others, or to God.

The only wisdom we can hope to acquire

Is the wisdom of humility: humility is endless." - T. S. Eliot


"O dark dark dark. They all go into the dark,

The vacant interstellar spaces, the vacant into the vacant,

And we all go with them, into the silent funeral,

Nobody's funeral, for there is no one to bury." - T. S. Eliot


"You say I am repeating

Something I have said before. I shall say it again.

Shall I say it again?" - T. S. Eliot  

On Criticism

"There are no two words in the English language more harmful than 'good job'." - Whiplash

"It's surprising how many people from The Movement circles are incapable of receiving, or constructing and voicing, criticism. Providing and welcoming criticism is incredibly important - it's the antithesis stage of the dialectic. Without it, there would be no real progress, since there are few, if any, individuals who are capable of critically assessing their work and their ideas.

"It is clear that majority of people from the West, particularly from the US and the UK, are very cautious when providing feedback for fear of hurting people's feelings. This creates a culture where being social (friendly) is more important than being honest and true to yourself. In this culture, people are not used to receiving serious, constructive criticism; hence they delude themselves that their first attempt is always good enough. This culture breeds mediocrity: it fosters wimpy softies, it sometimes even breeds pathetic, sensitive egomaniacs who are incapable of accepting that they were wrong, or that their work is not as good as they thought. What is worse, once they receive any negative word - they take it personally!

"Then they either ignore your comments and avoid interacting with you, or they give up completely. These people need to open themselves up to criticism and learn to rationally analyze this feedback and integrate it in their self-growth.

"When someone seriously criticizes you, rationally assess their criticism, consider whether the criticism has basis - if it's rational. Emotional criticism is nearly always subjective and therefore insignificant. On the other hand, rational criticism is like a map that can lead you to a treasure island. When assessing and analyzing criticism, it is important to consider the critic, as they might not have the expertise or the insight to provide you with an accurate picture. Just as some maps are more accurate than others, so some feedbacks are more helpful than others.

"If you view criticism rationally and not emotionally, there is no reason why you should feel bad when being criticized. Welcoming criticism is the best way forward for self-improvement. By ignoring any critical remarks addressed your way, you halt your development. Each of us perceives the world differently - we live in our own island realities. If you ask people around you, and they give you their honest opinion, nearly always their opinion of you differs from your own. This is why criticism is so vital. Often we overlook our weaknesses, or we just don't have a good standard of comparison.

"When people that are close to you give their honest feedback, they help you build a better picture of where you stand in relation to others. Criticism is like an immaterial reflection in a mirror that you wouldn't be able to see without someone's help. This is precious information, and if used appropriately, can help you transform yourself from base metal to gold."

"Linus Torvalds said, 'Don't ever make the mistake [of thinking] that you can design something better than what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence much too much credit.' What Torvalds describes is nothing other than dialectical evolution. That's why the dialectic has to be built into all aspects of society. Criticism is a necessary part of the dialectic, and essential for growth (as opposed to self-delusion)." - NK

MH: The West is an "other-directed" society where people look to get on well with their peers ("others"), to be in accord with them and agreeable to them. The thing they fear most is to be cast out from the social group. This means that many people go out of their way not to offend others, and this means that they don't criticise shoddy work, and instead praise it, thus giving a false impression of its quality and worth. This inevitably leads to a mediocre and even substandard world, a dumbed-down world rapidly racing to the bottom, not the top, in terms of quality. Crap is hailed as "genius"! People start to think they are much smarter and better than they actually are. They become totally self-deluded. Many Facebook trolls believe themselves geniuses, and others are too polite to tell that they are retarded and should fuck off back to the jungle and the caves where all the savages live.

On "Bless you"

Quite a few people emailed me ending their messages with the line: 'May Abraxas bless you.' I know it was well-intended, but, seriously, what were you thinking? What happened to the Nietzsche's call for revaluation of all religious and moral values?

"I have a divine spark and therefore I am already blessed, just like everyone else. I don't need anyone, not even the Universal Consciousness, to bless me. If I fail in my quest it is my fault alone (which I will take the responsibility for) and it's not because my efforts weren't blessed.

"This notion of having to be blessed comes from an infantile desire to be protected by a stronger, fatherly figure. It's just as bad as hoping for the Abrahamic 'God' to deliver justice. Screw that! If you feel you need to be smothered with attention - go get laid. Maybe that will help to set you free from this childish fantasy.

"And why would Abraxas care to bless anyone anyway? Isn't our mission in this life is to learn? Wouldn't we learn better from our failures? As the Dialectic unfolds we will get our chance to succeed, not because we were specifically blessed for that task, but because we were ready. We learned everything we could from our previous failures and finally we were able to successfully apply all that knowledge.

"We should go so far as to completely eradicate 'bless you' from our vocabularies. National Geographic reports that it was during the plague of CE 590 when 'Pope Gregory I ordered unceasing prayer for divine intercession. Part of his command was that anyone sneezing be blessed immediately ("God bless you"), since sneezing was often the first sign that someone was falling ill with the plague.' In this day and age, when religious superstition is rightly regarded as absurd, a more appropriate response to a sneeze would be 'to your health', or 'be healthy'.

"Be wary of all these religious customs that even non-believers take for granted. Most of the them insidiously make you a weaker, meeker person." - NK

MH: The Movement isn't a hippie movement. It's not New Age. It's not about peace, love, forgiveness, and turning the other cheek. It's not about faith. It isn't "spiritual" if spiritual means sitting under a tree meditating and chanting "om". It's not about the "love and light" brigade. It's much closer to Nietzsche than Buddha, and Nietzsche wasn't any kind of liberal. He was an extremist radical.

We don't want you to "like" us. We don't crave your approval. We want you to be strong, smart, trustworthy, honourable, noble, bold, resourceful brave ... as all knights should be that seek the Grail.

We simply aren't interested in the weak and the meek, those searching for something to fill the vacuum in their empty heads. We're interested in the Coming Race of superwomen and supermen, not in the bland, banal masses blabbering on about peace and love and some God substitute.

We want people who are committed to quality. As Robert M. Pirsig said, "Care and Quality are internal and external aspects of the same thing. A person who sees Quality and feels it as he works is a person who cares. A person who cares about what he sees and does is a person who's bound to have some characteristic of quality. ... Art is anything you can do well. Anything you can do with Quality."

Abraxas is defined as the first being to become God. Our task is to emulate him, not to worship him. Our task is to achieve the same Quality that he did. 


Narcissus: the Self-Admirer

"In 1898 Havelock Ellis, an English sexologist, used the term 'narcissus-like' in reference to excessive masturbation, whereby the person becomes his or her own sex object." - Wikipedia

"In 1923, Martin Buber published an essay 'Ich und Du' (I and You), in which he pointed out that our narcissism often leads us to relate to others as objects instead of as equals." - Wikipedia

"Since 2000, on psychological tests designed to detect narcissism, the scores of residents of the United States have continually increased. Psychologists have suggested a link to social networking. Hotchkiss identified what she called the seven deadly sins of narcissism:

1. Shamelessness: Shame is the feeling that lurks beneath all unhealthy narcissism, and the inability to process shame in healthy ways.

2. Magical thinking: Narcissists see themselves as perfect, using distortion and illusion known as magical thinking. They also use projection to dump shame onto others.

3. Arrogance: A narcissist who is feeling deflated may reinflate by diminishing, debasing, or degrading somebody else.

4. Envy: A narcissist may secure a sense of superiority in the face of another person's ability by using contempt to minimize the other person.

5. Entitlement: Narcissists hold unreasonable expectations of particularly favourable treatment and automatic compliance because they consider themselves special. Failure to comply is considered an attack on their superiority, and the perpetrator is considered an 'awkward' or 'difficult' person. Defiance of their will is a narcissistic injury that can trigger narcissistic rage.

6. Exploitation: Can take many forms but always involves the exploitation of others without regard for their feelings or interests. Often the other is in a subservient position where resistance would be difficult or even impossible. Sometimes the subservience is not so much real as assumed.

7. Bad boundaries: Narcissists do not recognize that they have boundaries and that others are separate and are not extensions of themselves. Others either exist to meet their needs or may as well not exist at all. Those who provide narcissistic supply to the narcissist are treated as if they are part of the narcissist and are expected to live up to those expectations. In the mind of a narcissist, there is no boundary between self and other. Although most individuals have some narcissistic traits, high levels of narcissism can manifest themselves in a pathological form as narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), whereby the patient overestimates his or her abilities and has an excessive need for admiration and affirmation." - Wikipedia

"Campbell and Foster (2007) review the literature on narcissism. They argue that narcissists possess the following 'basic ingredients':

Positive: Narcissists think they are better than others.

Inflated: Narcissists' views tend to be contrary to reality. In measures that compare self-report to objective measures, narcissists' self-views tend to be greatly exaggerated.

Agentic: Narcissists' views tend to be most exaggerated in the agentic domain, relative to the communion domain.

Special: Narcissists perceive themselves to be unique and special people.

Selfish: Research upon narcissists' behaviour in resource dilemmas supports the case for narcissists as being selfish.

Oriented toward success: Narcissists are oriented towards success by being, for example, approach oriented." - Wikipedia

"Narcissistic supply is a concept introduced into psychoanalytic theory by Otto Fenichel in 1938, to describe a type of admiration, interpersonal support or sustenance drawn by an individual from his or her environment and essential to their self-esteem.

"The term is typically used in a negative sense, describing a pathological or excessive need for attention or admiration in codependents and the orally fixated, that does not take into account the feelings, opinions or preferences of other people." - Wikipedia

"Narcissistic rage is a reaction to narcissistic injury, which is a perceived threat to a narcissist's self-esteem or self-worth. Narcissistic injury (or narcissistic scar) is a phrase used by Sigmund Freud in the 1920s; narcissistic wound and narcissistic blow are further, almost interchangeable terms. The term narcissistic rage was coined by Heinz Kohut in 1972.

"Narcissistic rage occurs on a continuum from instances of aloofness, and expression of mild irritation or annoyance, to serious outbursts, including violent attacks. Narcissistic rage reactions are not limited to personality disorders and may be also seen in catatonic, paranoid delusion and depressive episodes. It has also been suggested that narcissists have two layers of rage. The first layer of rage can be thought of as a constant anger (towards someone else), with the second layer being a self-aimed wrath." - Wikipedia

"Aggressive narcissism - This is Factor 1 in the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, which includes the following traits:

Glibness/superficial charm

Grandiose sense of self-worth

Pathological lying

Cunning/manipulative." - Wikipedia

"Collective narcissism (or group narcissism) is a type of narcissism where an individual has an inflated self-love of his or her own ingroup, where an 'ingroup' is a group in which an individual is personally involved. While the classic definition of narcissism focuses on the individual, collective narcissism asserts that one can have a similar excessively high opinion of a group, and that a group can function as a narcissistic entity. Collective narcissism is related to ethnocentrism; however, ethnocentrism primarily focuses on self-centeredness at an ethnic or cultural level, while collective narcissism is extended to any type of ingroup beyond just cultures and ethnicities." - Wikipedia


Right-wingers, free-market capitalists, anarcho-capitalist libertarians, Randroids and religious fundamentalists are all on the narcissistic spectrum. The financial meltdown of 2008 was caused by the psychopathic narcissists of the banking sector.

Our world is controlled by narcissists, psychopaths, sociopaths, egotists, Id-iots, hawks and predators.

How does the rest of humanity curb and control these monsters in its midst? How does it actively prevent these people from acquiring wealth, power and influence?

The monsters are the right wingers who promote the private good over the public good. All decent human beings are inherently left wing and want a fair, just world in which everyone, from whatever background, gets a fair crack of the whip, a proper chance to make the most of themselves, and rise as high as their talents deserve. 


Democracy = no values, no quality, no excellence, no identity, no engagement, no positive liberty, no vision.

Democracy = rule by a failed, out of touch elite.

What is the real face beneath the democratic mask? What are the people behind the masks hiding?


"In the military they give medals to those who sacrifice themselves so others may gain. In business, we give bonuses to those who sacrifice others so we may gain. We have it backward." - Simon Sinek

No, you have it in exactly the manner required by narcissistic psychopaths.


"Ye are many - they are few." - Shelley

No Men

Are you the No Men of No Man's Land?


"Liberty is not the power of doing what we like, but the right to do what we ought." - Lord Acton

Right wing people are driven by their Id and are concerned with doing what they like (regardless of others). Left wing people are driven by their Superego, and are concerned with doing what is right (being fair and just to others). Right wingers have no interest in any kind of equality, and constantly rail against it. Left wingers want equality to apply wherever possible and wherever sensible.

Immune System

We need an auto-immune system for the human race - one that recognises the harmful humans in its midst and attacks and eradicates them. We need retaliators who seek out the hawks that prey on the doves, and get rid of them.

The Illuminati

The Illuminati are not aliens or capitalists or communists ... they are the enlightened ones.


Capitalist globalism leads to people feeling more and more powerless. They can't see whose ruling them. They can't see how to influence or affect or change the minds of those ruling them. They can't vote them out. They can't fire them. They don't even know who to rebel or revolt against. How can you hold a revolution against the "market"?

Power must come much closer to the people. It must be local, not global. Everyone must see exactly who is ruling them, and know exactly how to get rid of them if they're doing a bad job.

People need to reclaim their political identity, and that means they must become active rather than passive citizens. We need a rebirth of the values of ancient Athens where citizens who did not take part in the active governance of their own society were known as "idiots". Idiot originally meant "private person", i.e. a person who cut himself off from the public arena, hence knew nothing about what was going on, hence was an ignoramus. Today, the vast majority of democratic voters are idiots. They think that casting a meaningless vote every few years makes them an engaged citizen.

People's identity is invested in their family, religion, community, nationality, race, sexuality, career and so on. The primary source of your identity should be the political system in which you live - since that's the thing that ultimately defines your life.


Children always want fun. Adults want fun more and more too, hence adults are becoming infantilised. The world increasingly seems to comprise people who are permanent children, people who never grow up. This is a Peter Pan world.

Sure, there is a time for fun, but there's also a time for hard work, sweat, difficulty, hardships, trials, quests ... for slaying dragons.

Capitalism is an infantilising economic system. It wants you to be a permanent kid in a permanent candy store, always buying whatever takes your fancy.

The Eyes

The eyes of fear see danger everywhere. The eyes of confidence see opportunity everywhere. The demons of fear say you are not good enough. The angels of confidence say you can do anything to which you apply yourself.


The received history, the received wisdom, the received narrative, the received way of doing things ... all human progress is brought about by those who reject what they "receive".


Are you stuck? Well, what are you doing to get unstuck? Do you have no real prospects? Well, what are you doing to create prospects for yourself? Are you helpless, are you hopeless, are you trapped? Are you lonely and unhappy? Are you passive and apathetic? Are you ruled by fear? Do you stay in bad relationships because you're terrified of being on your own? Well, what are you doing about it?


"Why do people stay together for so long in bad relationships? They eat so much shit for so long, they don't even recognise the taste of it after a while." - As Cool As I Am

Have you ceased to recognise the taste of the shit you're being forced to eat?





Ultimately, people eat shit because they want to. They are scared not to. They are scared of doing whatever it takes to stop eating shit.

War and Peace  

"I don't know what will happen and don't want to know, and can't, but if I want this - want glory, want to be known to men, want to be loved by them, it is not my fault that I want it and want nothing but that and live only for that. Yes, for that alone! I shall never tell anyone, but, dear Lord! what am I to do if I love nothing but fame and men's esteem? I know that tomorrow I may be killed, but tomorrow I may also be able to show of what I am capable. Death, wounds, the loss of family - nothing frightens me. However much I love my father, my sister, my wife, I would give it all for one a moment of glory, a moment of triumph in front of men, of love from men I don't know and never shall know, for the love of these men here [the military leadership]." - Prince Andrei Bolkonsky (Tolstoy's War and Peace)

Well, are you going to leave your mark on the world, or be just another bystander, another understudy, another also-ran? It's your choice.


"Democratic" politicians are in charge but not in control. To be more accurate, they appear to be in charge, and, in a world of appearances, a world of people always faking it, that's sufficient. The purpose of democratic politicians is to play the part of ruling in the name of the people, while the elite puppetmasters get on with ruling in their own name and own interests.


Power, not Reason, is in control.

Money, not intelligence, is in control.

Humanity worships power and money, not reason and intelligence. Humanity's values need to be entirely revalued. That can happen only when the myths that humanity lives by are entirely rewritten.


Zombie parliaments, zombie religions, zombie nations, zombie people. Where are the living? Wherever you look, you can see only the undead.


The name for a leaderless samurai is a ronin. A ronin is a drifter, a "gun for hire", an itinerant mercenary soldier. He has no master. He has been cast adrift from his former way of life. Ronin means "wave man" - a man metaphorically at sea, with no port, no home, no roots. His only sellable skill is killing people. For a samurai, losing your Lord led to a catastrophic loss of status - which is why these elite killers fought to the death for their Lords.


Always be moving forward!


Guilt ... the eternal watcher. The watcher that never sleeps.



As far as average people are concerned, Logos can never engage them emotionally, hence can never satisfy and comfort them. Joseph Campbell is right that humanity needs myths to live by. The task is to find the best myths, the ones that optimise humanity rather than degrade it. The myths of mainstream religion are enormously damaging to the human psyche and human progress.

The Fivefold Way

Everyone is offered the Fivefold Way, i.e. a choice of five paths for understanding the true nature of existence, only one of which actually leads to the Truth:

Path 1) Organised Religion - totally false. Mythos nonsense.

Path 2) New Age Spirituality - totally false. Mythos nonsense.

Path 3) Scientific Materialism - a sensory Mythos, and excellent at modelling the sensory world of appearances - and totally useless at everything else. Utterly false regarding its claims about ultimate reality.

Path 4) Philosophy - a thinking Mythos. A Grand Philosophy, such as that of Schopenhauer, presents an all-encompassing, ingenious explanation of reality, yet lacks observational evidence such as science can provide, or rational proof, such as mathematics can provide.

Path 5) Ontological mathematics. If the universe is rational, which it is, then only a purely rational system can capture its Truths. That system is ontological mathematics.

Some people imagine that the universe isn't rational. To contemplate that issue, first remove all animals from existence, especially humans. Do planets orbiting stars make errors? Do suns make errors in their production of energy? Do galaxies commit mistakes? Error is associated with subjective opinions and beliefs about the operations of the universe, but the operations of the universe are themselves flawless and perfect, reflecting absolute mathematical precision. How can that mathematical precision be explained if mathematics is not the answer to the fundamental nature of existence? What can offer mathematical precision that is not mathematics? How can anything be like mathematics, yet not be mathematics? Mathematics has no imitators.

How does error enter a mathematical universe? It's very simple. It enters through perfect mathematical basis notes - sinusoidal waves - being put together badly. An expert playing the piano can produce the most sublime music of the Gods. A rank amateur can produce the infernal discord of Pandemonium. It's the player who makes the mistakes, not the piano.

A mathematical universe means a universe based on perfect mathematical notes. However, these notes can be subjectively assembled in infinite ways, and countless of these ways are sub-optimal, and sub-optimal is synonymous with error, with irrationalism, with departure from the path of Absolute Truth.

The mathematical universe - viewed from the perspective of its objective "notes" and laws - is perfect. However, the mathematical universe also comprises subjective monadic minds, and these minds are capable of assembling the perfect notes of mathematics in myriad sub-optimal ways, equating to silly beliefs, opinions, interpretations, guesses, and hypotheses about the nature of reality and how best to live life.

Religion and Spirituality

It's remarkable how much drivel is talked about the alleged difference between religion and spirituality. The fact is that all religions are spiritual, and all spiritual beliefs are religious. What people are actually referring to is the difference between dogmatic, organised, collective religion, and pick 'n' mix, personal spirituality, whereby a person subscribes to no particular mainstream religion, but, like a jackdaw, picks up whatever shiny object he can find from religion, science, mathematics, or anywhere else.

Illuminism is a religion because it's predicated on the soul, on immortality, on evolution towards perfection ("God"), on the attainment of absolute knowledge, on the strength of the spirit and will, on teleology, on the utter rejection of materialism. It does not, however, rely in any way on faith, revelation, popes, priest, prophets, sin, heaven and hell, or any kind of Creator.

Genghis Khan

The dying Genghis Khan didn't want his tomb found, so he gave instructions to his soldiers to butcher everyone they saw on the way to his chosen burial site, to kill everyone involved in constructing his tomb, and then, finally, to kill themselves. It seems that they were true to their orders because nearly 800 years after the bloody warlord's death, the location of his tomb remains unknown.

The tomb is said to conceal an incredible treasure, brought from every corner of the Khan's vast Mongolian empire. The site of his tomb is a "forbidden zone", a "great taboo".

The "Experience" Delusion

Old people try to gain an advantage over young people by referring to their superior "experience." Well, let's consider the whole issue of experience. Old Abrahamists, no doubt, have had countless experiences and yet they are as stupid as they were the day they were born, and they still know nothing about true reality. So much for experience.

The "voice of experience" is frequently the voice of a fool, a charlatan and a bully. A smart twenty-year old can be much closer to enlightenment than some pompous, sanctimonious, self-inflated, crashing old bore telling everyone how much life experience he has (but thus proving it was all to no avail since anyone who had learned from life would know never to play the old man's card).

People who think that experience rather than reason is the way to enlightenment are as deluded as you can get. How many old folk do you know who have decades of experience, yet know nothing of the secrets of existence? Such people are legion.

Experience is valuable only if it helps you to reason better, and, if it doesn't, it's worthless.

Many people would be well-advised to forget everything they think their experience has taught them and start again from scratch. They need to downsize their experience and upsize their reason, intelligence and knowledge.

It's not experience that separates people but reason. A young, smart person is much closer to the truth than an old, experienced, bombastic idiot.

Referring to "experience" is simply a means for silly old men to big themselves up and pretend they know shit. Most of them know fuck all ... and are exactly the people who made the world the shithole and mental asylum it is today.

Remember the maxim that must be applied to all experience: have you had a thousand different experiences, or the same experience a thousand times? Dull-minded people just keep repeating the same old same old, and believing the same old same old. They never learn a thing. They're too dumb, too arrogant and too lazy to learn.

Many old people are experienced in things that are now obsolete. A vast amount of people's experience becomes obsolete long before they're dead, rendering all such experiences worthless and irrelevant to the world. If experience is useful, why do billions of people still believe the superstitions of the ancient Middle East?

Experience and progress do not go together. Most geniuses do their masterwork before the age of 25 ... before they are corrupted by "experience".

The truths that Plato talked about are still true today. The experiences of the old gits who mocked Plato are forgotten and irrelevant.

In the face of the Truth, you must be as humble as possible. Experience has nothing to do with Truth. Countless human beings have had countless experiences ... how many of these same people have told you the Truth of Existence, down to the finest detail? How many of these people believe the same old shit with which their parents brainwashed them? How many of them still believe crazy old, refuted religions from the Bronze Age? Billions of people today still believe that Moses parted the Red Sea, that Mohammed met the Angel Gabriel in a cave, and that the rabbi Yehoshua ben Yosef was God! So, of what value is experience? Only reason and intelligence count.

"Experience" is just another form of faith, just another subjective opinion, conjecture, hypothesis, interpretation. It has zero Truth Content.

The eternal truths of reason of course existed before the instant of the Big Bang. There are no eternal truths of experience. If you want to know what preceded the Big Bang, you have nowhere to go other than reason. And if you don't know what preceded the Big Bang, you will never know anything about reality, and you will never reach enlightenment.


The world is not suffering from a shortage of experience, but it's certainly suffering from a severe deficiency of reason, intellect and knowledge.

When it comes to experience, there are two types: valuable and worthless. For most people, their experiences are worthless, and they never learn anything from them. Valuable experiences are those that make you more rational, and better able to recognize the rational truth.

Many older people were fooled in their youth, and have never forgotten the shame of being duped. However, rather than developing greater reason so that they can see through bogus claims, they have simply become cynical, skeptical, closed-minded and paranoid. If you placed the Truth right in front of them, they would never see it ... because they would be terrified it was just another con to deceive them. Many older people voluntarily blind themselves to the Truth.


A statement purporting to be rational is either right or wrong. Faith doesn't come into it, opinion doesn't come into it, and experience doesn't come into it. Don't let any old bores prattle on about experience. Ask them what they know and what they can prove, and you will soon discover that they know nothing and can prove nothing, and all they have to offer you is bitterness, cynicism and skepticism. Most older people have failed in life, and everything they say reeks of failure, and they are terrified of anything new that they know they won't be able to understand because that will make them even more obsolete, and even bigger failures, so they end up railing against everything new and becoming utterly conservative and reactionary.


For 99.9% of people, your experience of life is valueless if you imagine it has told you even one thing about ultimate reality. Living and knowing are two totally different things. Living gives you countless experiences, but it doesn't tell you what reality is. Endless people have come and gone without having established any relationship with the Truth.

There are people who say things such as, "There are two kinds of knowledge: false knowledge, which all belief systems are - you have no experience of them yourself, but you keep talking about 'higher planes', for example. And there is true knowledge, which is intrinsically tied to your own experience."

But this is absurd. Your "knowledge" of your experiences is exactly that: knowledge of your experiences. It's not knowledge of everything that you DON'T experience, the whole of existence outside yourself, the whole of unexperienceable, noumenal, ultimate, rationalist reality. Those people who say that their experiences constitute knowledge are solipsistic clowns. People in madhouses have never-ending experiences. What sane person would accept that these experiences reflect real knowledge?

You get people who say, "ALL knowledge tends to de-mystify existence, which is a mistake: Existence is inherently mystical." This is an outright attack on knowledge, and a formula for mystical obscurantism, faith and, ultimately, total solipsism. (Moreover, it's often exactly the same people who say that all true knowledge is tied to your own experience who also say that existence is inherently mystical, i.e. it has nothing to do with knowledge, and true knowledge is fundamentally impossible, which raises a blatant contradiction in referring to "true" and "false" knowledge in the first place. If existence is inherently mystical, "false" knowledge is no falser then "true" knowledge, since knowledge has no meaning in a mystical system explicitly predicated on the denial of authentic knowledge.)

You get people who say, "Real wisdom is not parroting false knowledge, but comes from the heart and from experience." Well, that's neither wisdom nor knowledge but sheer emotionalism and solipsism, with no validity beyond the person saying it.

You get people who say, "And Enlightenment happens when all thoughts stop, but you are still conscious." This is the sort of irrational drivel that such people constantly spout. Leaving aside the absurd idea that thoughts can stop in inherently thinking beings, consciousness MEANS being aware of your own thoughts. If all of your thoughts have stopped than you have ceased to exist, and if you are not aware of any of your thoughts, you are not conscious. In neither case have you achieved Enlightenment. In fact, you have achieved the opposite.

Such remarks are all too typical of New Age irrationalism, which is all about the heart, the senses, the gut, and experiences, but never about the head, reason, intellect, knowledge, and mathematics. These people think they know something, but don't in fact know anything at all.

Why do people like to refer to experience rather than knowledge? It's because their subjective experiences can't be contradicted. However, their claims to knowledge definitely can! All the charlatans - lying through their teeth to you - hide behind "experience". Here's what we stand behind: 1 + 1 = 2!!! Now, fuck off anyone who disagrees with that!

No New Age "gurus" ever refer to provable or evidential statements. They only ever refer to personal anecdotes, personal feelings, personal experience, personal intuitions, their personal Mythos ... total subjective nonsense.


Do you have something to say or nothing worth hearing? As Pythagoras said, "Be silent or let thy words be worth more than silence." All the New Age spiritualists ought to embrace silence ... permanently!

Never listen to anyone telling you personal anecdotes, and about their "experiences". That's the opposite of knowledge. The whole of Christianity, Buddhism and Islam flows from ridiculous personal anecdotes and "experiences". It's Mythos garbage. You'd need to be deranged to believed that another person's experiences can reveal the truth of existence to you. Unfortunately, most people ARE deranged. They are submissives who lap up everything that charismatic dominants tell them, no matter how ridiculous. "Islam" is just one giant personal anecdote by a psychotic dominant, and lapped up by the submissive Arab hordes.


The whole of Buddhism results from what some freaky old geezer experienced while sitting under a tree. How mad would you have to be to be a Buddhist?

The whole of Christianity flows from some Jewish rabbi's delusion that he was the Son of God.

The whole of Judaism flows from one guy (Abraham) who thought that God ordered him to murder his own son, and from another guy (Moses) who held a conversation with a burning bush!

Don't you see? It's all these stories, anecdotes, and "experiences" that are the source of the Mythos lunacy that gullible, credulous people believe in.

In modern times, David Icke had a mental breakdown, started wearing purple and believing himself the Son of God. Then he said that the Illuminati were shapeshifting, pan-dimensional aliens. Er.... !!! Not surprisingly this nutter has hundreds of thousands of followers. It has always been thus. Read the God Series by Mike Hockney if you want to stop being insane! It doesn't contain a single anecdote or reference to personal experience. It doesn't ask for your trust, or for you to believe anything. It utterly condemns faith, mysticism and obscurantism.


We often get accused of hate. So what? We DO hate. We hate all of the morons getting in the way of humanity's divine trajectory, all of the clowns who believe in ancient stories of weird, psychotic tribes wandering in the Middle East in search of God (and having visions of burning bushes, angels, and so on), all the fools who believe in love and light, the pacifist cowards, the politically correct liberals who want to destroy freedom of expression, the idiots who worship democracy, the deluded who imagine they are unconditionally free to do what they like, the selfish, greedy capitalists ... absolutely everyone putting the brakes on the advance of humanity.

You're living in a fantasy world if you believe the problems of this world will be solved by people saying, "Peace, man; give me a big hug; love and light", or sitting under a tree to meditate (what a pointless exercise ... a clear manifestation of anti-life forces, of running away from life so as not to "suffer").

What has delivered humanity's control of its environment and its ability to land men on the moon - mathematics and science, or religion and meditation? No prizes for getting the right answer.

Only reason will set humanity free. Only intelligence will solve our problems. The people who say that we should not hate the irrational are themselves the irrational and deserve to be hated.

This is a dialectical universe, and, if you understand what that means, you will know that hate is one of the primary drivers of enlightenment. Humanity progresses to enlightenment as much through hate as love... that's what the dialectic is all about.

Don't be afraid to hate. Always hate what deserves to be hated. Otherwise, you are aiding and abetting the hateful, and you are therefore hateful too (and not the "nice" person you delude yourself that you are). Never tolerate that which should never be tolerated, for otherwise you are giving solace to the intolerant. Always hate irrationalism or you yourself are promoting irrationalism.

Never forget that enlightenment is all about knowledge, about understanding the true workings of reality. It has nothing to do with pacifism, liberalism, hippies, meditation, "om", karma, or Eastern religion.

Never equate enlightenment to love and non-hate. Always equate it to the highest reason, intellect and knowledge, to revealing how the universe works in its innermost kernel. If you get this wrong, your whole life will be wrong.

There are countless people who believe themselves on the path to enlightenment who are in fact entering upon the road to absolute endarkenment. Buddhism, for example, is entirely false ontologically and epistemologically, hence has zero truth content. It's just one ancient guru's opinion of what enlightenment is, and if you listen to the wrong guru, you've thrown your whole life away.

We never ask anyone to believe us or trust us or listen to our "experience". What we say either makes rational sense or it doesn't, and if you can outreason us and disprove us (which would require you to be a genius in the field of ontological reason and ontological mathematics - good luck with that!), you ought to reject everything we say. That's the test we apply. If something - such as Buddhism - is unquestionably irrational, we reject it.

If you can't trust your own reason, you're in real trouble. You should agree with us only if your reason mandates it (which it will if you're a highly intelligent person, and won't if you're not, in which case you will certainly oppose us, denounce, and call us "fakes", liars, madmen, pseudo-Abrahamists, and so on).

We get legions of carping trolls who read only about three pages of our material - and then feel absolutely qualified to dismiss it as nonsense while they peddle their absurd pet theories. They say we are full of hate, while they themselves direct nothing but hate towards us. They accuse us of being divisive like the Abrahamists, and then fail to see how divisive they themselves are. So it goes. Stupid people never see themselves for what they are. We have nothing against divisiveness, provided you're on the right side of the divide. In fact, we dialectically rely on it. What we can't stand is divisive, toxic trolls calling us divisive. Take a look in the mirror, why don't you?! There's nothing worse than divisive people saying they are against divisiveness. They have no self-awareness at all. If you are a person who is angry, frustrated, and hateful towards many people, embrace it! Why do you think evolution gave us these emotions?! Don't disown your own nature to listen to some deluded guru or self-appointed preacher man.

Don't feed the clowns, Don't interact with them. If you do, they'll drag you down to their gutter level.

Get Smart

Get Real

Get Dialectical

The Mediocre Souls

Don't be one of the monochrome souls, one of the legions of the mediocre and totally forgettable. Mediocre souls do not commit any noteworthy crimes or sins, but nor do they do anything to achieve greatness and recognition, any acts of merit that would earn their entry ticket to the Elysian Fields.

Divine Mathematics

Mathematics traces the patterns of eternity. It draws the face of God himself.

Eternal Form

"The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep…" - Genesis 1:2

But "God" wasn't formless and void. Form, order and organisation always exist. There's no such thing as the "formless and void". The state preceding the Big Bang wasn't "formless and void". It was mathematical Form defined by the God Equation. It was the Fourier frequency domain, which gave rise to the Fourier spacetime domain. At no stage was there any formlessness or void anywhere at all. True formlessness and void don't exist. The fabric of existence is noumenal, ontological mathematics, the quintessence of form, order, and organisation.



The Dialectic

The point of the dialectic is to overcome unreason. The universe is mathematical, but also unconscious. How does an unconscious mathematical system solve itself? How does it optimise itself? It can't carefully, rationally plan what to do. It can't sit down and work out a strategy. So, what it does is execute the necessarily crudest rational procedure possible - the dialectic.

It proposes one thing (the thesis) and then brings this into conflict with its opposite (the antithesis). When the smoke clears, what remains is the synthesis. This serves as a new thesis, which will in turn generate a new antithesis, and a new synthesis, and so on. We keep going round and round, but, critically, each iteration is higher than the previous one - like a spiral - and the process converges on a final conclusion, the tip of the spiral - the Omega Point.

The dialectical process resolves all contradictions, errors, falsehoods, fallacies, delusions, opinions, interpretations, hypotheses, conjectures, inconsistencies, and incompleteness.

It brings the universe to mathematical, rational perfection, which is the point of PERFECT MATHEMATICAL SYMMETRY. This is where mathematical Form and Content are aligned, where Form (which was always consistent and complete) at last coincides with Content (which was inconsistent and incomplete until "cured" by the dialectic).

The dialectic is guaranteed to turn unreason into reason, or, to be more accurate, non-optimised reason into optimised reason. Most people in the world deploy extremely primitive reason, based on their feelings, senses and mystical intuitions. It's not that they are irrational, but, rather, that their rationality is crude, infantile, inefficient and ineffective. Smart people use reason far more effectively than stupid people.

Humanity has, over tens of thousands of years, progressed from living in caves to landing men on the moon because of the dialectical evolution of reason, and nothing else. Faith didn't land men on the moon; opinion didn't land men on the moon; guessing didn't land men on the moon; old men banging on about their "experience" didn't land men on the moon; priests, rabbis, imams, gurus, popes, sages, shamans, witch doctors, magicians, Buddhas, and the spiritually "enlightened" didn't land men on the moon. Haven't you got the message yet?

It's the smart, rational, knowledgeable, intelligent people who lead humanity forward. They are the ones on the side of the advancing, rational dialectic. All the rest are the antithetical dialectical forces they are obliged to overcome.

We have countless enemies - the legions of morons who wouldn't understand ontological mathematics and ontological dialectics in a trillion years. They oppose us because they are terrified of us. They know that we spell their doom. They are the dinosaurs waiting for extinction. Reason will wipe out all those opposed to reason. Soz!

It's when your capacity for reason starts exploding exponentially that you achieve gnosis, gain complete knowledge of the workings of reality, and become God.

The universe has a rational answer, and when you are rational enough, you can know it and live it ... and that's what God is.

The prize on offer to all Illuminists is that you will become the Gods that consciously direct the universe towards its Omega Point. You will be the ones in the driving seat, fulfilling the internal impulse of existence towards perfection. All the rest - the followers - will be riding on your tails.

As an inevitable stage of the dialectic, the blind, rationally sub-optimal unconscious is turned into visionary, rationally optimal consciousness, which can then rationally plan how best to conclude the dialectical process, and it does so through the actions of all-powerful rational Gods, the Gods that have evolved from amongst humanity! Are you one of them? Do you have the potential?

The Illuminati is THE secret society devoted to the completion of the dialectic and to being the agents of dialectical culmination, a task reserved exclusively for those rational and smart enough to become Gods.

Are you one of those who can drive the universe to its appointed conclusion? Only the finest human beings are eligible, only they are called, and the worst of humanity will resist us to the bitter end. So it goes.


The dialectic is the quintessence of polarisation. You cannot arrive at the Truth via hippie consensus, "respect" and "love". The Truth isn't the mid-ground, the liberal centre, the position of maximum tolerance of error, falsehood and delusion. The Truth is as extreme as it gets.


The world must be liberated from the long, unendurable darkness. This benighted world must be illuminated, so that it can fulfil the greatest of all destinies, the DIVINE DESTINY. Are you one of the evolving Gods, or one of the enemies of the dialectical Gods, and a believer in the decrepit Creationist Gods of ancient myth?

Political Systems

We endorse Plato's Republic and Rousseau's Social Contract. We want the Hegelian dialectic to be built into every aspect of society. We are wholly opposed to unelected, unaccountable, unintelligent "markets" allowing the rich to invisibly and sinisterly control the gullible, ignorant masses. We seek a Star Trek future where organised religion has been utterly marginalised, free-market capitalism abolished, the super rich rendered extinct, and the world is ruled by the smartest, most intelligent and talented members of humanity.


Sophia ... wisdom.

Philosophy ... love of wisdom.

Science ... knowledge (Latin).

Gnosis ... knowledge (Greek).

Logos ... Reason.

Mathematics ... Learning.

Illuminism is all about reason, learning, knowledge, and wisdom. We are opposed to organised religion, faith, New Age syncretism and spiritualist bullshit, doped-out hippie nonsense, "love and light" claptrap, conspiracy theories, and so on.

We don't rate the experiences of stupid people, only of smart people who have learned from their mistakes and put their experience to good use, rather than simply becoming arrogant, self-inflated and in thrall to their own propaganda and self-delusions.

We advocate using the scientific method to study the empirical, phenomenal, observable world, and the mathematical method to study the rational, noumenal, unobservable world.

We want to bring about a Second Enlightenment where a True Age of Reason is inaugurated, and the scientific and mathematical methods are extended to all aspects of society.


Gnostics aim to achieve gnosis (enlightenment). Gnosis does not mean experience, it does not mean love, or faith, or peace, or kissing, or hugging, or chanting "om", or sitting cross-legged under a tree, or meditating, or any of the other garbage that's fallaciously associated with enlightenment by those who haven't the vaguest idea what enlightenment is. If you think you're well on the path to enlightenment then where is your clear answer for what reality is? Put up or shut up. If you can't provide such an answer, you're just a blowhard and charlatan. We have provided our exact answer in the God Series of books, and we defy anyone on earth to refute us. It's impossible to defeat reason and knowledge. That's a fact, and only a fool - an empty vessel, toom tabard, and false prophet - would try.

Experience doesn't trump reason. Empiricism doesn't beat rationalism. No empiricist ever has or ever could define existence. Existence has only one rational answer - ontological mathematics, defined by the God Equation (the generalised Euler Formula).

Illuminism emphatically isn't for everyone. It's only for the smartest people on earth, and that means the most rational, intelligent and knowledgeable.

Don't listen to any narcissists who can't disprove a single word or number of ontological mathematics, yet blabber on incessantly about how false, phoney and worthless Illuminism is.

We know that we are casting peals before swine, but we also know that there are a few higher souls out there who are intellectually capable of recognising the truth when they come across it.

If you don't understand mathematics - or, alternatively music, light, electricity or holography (which all express it) - you will never understand existence. The mystery of existence is the mystery of mathematics. All the strange things of existence are encapsulated in the two numbers zero and infinity.

As you would expect, stupid people will convince themselves that math is not the answer. That's the nature of such people.

Math isn't the answer people are looking for. Math is the answer they AREN'T looking for.

Who wants the Truth? Certainly not the average person. They want any old bullshit that makes them feel good. You could write the answer to existence in letters and numbers a thousand metres high in the sky, and the average person still wouldn't "see" it.

We have zero interest in what average people consider the answer to existence, or what they think they're looking for. What they're really seeking is the validation of their own egos, delusions, fantasies, opinions, beliefs and interpretations. It has always been thus. Mathematics is the answer to existence because it's the thing furthest removed from human self-delusion.

Here's the real issue - do you believe that you are smarter than reason itself? Do you think you can beat reason? All enlightened people reach a very simple conclusion ... nothing can be superior to reason, and reason is expressed through mathematics. From that everything else follows.

We have a rational universe purely because it's made of reason (mathematics), and, if it weren't, it wouldn't be rational. People who think something other than math/reason is the answer to the rational/ intelligible universe are just unbelievably dumb ... and totally irrational (natch)!

It's easy to show people the answer to existence, but getting them to understand it is more or less impossible. You need to be rational to understand the rational universe. You need to be intelligent to understand the intelligible universe. People are neither rational nor intelligent ... which is why people believe never-ending bullshit.

If you're clever, you'll already know that, and you will treat with contempt the irrationalists who try to tell you that you're wrong and that they're right because they have "experience", or faith, or sensory evidence, or mystical intuition, or whatever other nonsense such people discharge.


Here's a message to all stupid people ... don't worry, you will all be cured in the end ... by the dialectic. That's its job ... to turn fools (base metal) into Gods (gold).

Helen of Troy

Hellene (plural Hellenes): a Greek, especially an ancient Greek.

Should we refer to "Helen" of Troy as "Helene" of Troy? The story of the Trojan War is the story of something or someone extremely precious to the Hellenes (Greeks) being taken by the Trojans, and having to be recovered, no matter the price, for the honour of Hellas (Greece).

The Pope

The current Pope has made so many casual remarks that defy orthodox Catholic theology that, 500 years ago, he would have been burned at the stake as a heretic!

The Pope is just a PR man, designed to be "nice, liberal and cuddly", a media-friendly figure. Catholicism purports to be about Absolute Truth, and no Catholic can contradict today what the Catholic Church pronounced true yesterday. According to the Catholic Church, all non-Catholics are damned to hell ("There is no salvation outside the Church"), animals don't have souls, and the Pope is Jesus Christ's substitute on earth ... until the Second Coming.


Spammers send people messages with subject lines saying things such as, "You have an email that MUST be read." Some people find it very hard to resist reading something that "MUST be read". Religions are ancient spamming schemes that say, "You MUST read this Holy Text, and you MUST believe it or terrible consequences will befall you." Historically, many submissives found it impossible not to go along with the "prophets" - the ancient religious spammers who sent their spam to every corner of the world.


What are the laws of nature? Did they pop out of nothing and then evolve? If a miracle is defined as a violation of the laws of nature then how do we refer to events that happened prior to the existence of the laws of nature? They can't violate these laws since the laws don't exist. However, nor are these events rational or lawful, which renders them magical and miraculous.

A miracle ought to be defined as anything irrational, inconsistent, and inherently incompatible with laws of nature. In which case, anyone who denies that the laws of nature are eternal is claiming a miraculous origin of the laws of nature.

Well, here's the thing ... if the laws of nature as regards spacetime and matter did not exist prior to the Big Bang (since there was no spacetime or matter), as science claims, then these laws were generated miraculously! That is, science is formally predicated on the miraculous appearance of laws of nature out of nothing at all, yet science claims to be a rational undertaking (!).

If you do not accept the existence of miracles then you are committed to agreeing that the laws of nature are ETERNAL, and that means that the laws of spacetime and matter ALREADY EXISTED prior to the Big Bang, because otherwise they would have miraculously appeared from nowhere.

Mathematically, there's an extremely easy way to make sense of this situation. Prior to the Big Bang, what existed was a pure frequency domain - an immaterial Singularity outside space and time. Thanks to well-known Fourier mathematics, frequency functions can be translated into spacetime functions. In other words, the laws of spacetime and matter did not magic themselves into existence out of nothing, but are eternally implicit in the eternal mathematical laws of nature regarding immaterial frequencies outside space and time. And what are such frequencies? What are immaterial entities outside space and time? They are none other than immortal, indestructible mathematical SOULS. They are eternal, autonomous Fourier frequency domains. They are SINGULARITIES. Singularities = minds!

The Market?

What do you want - a designed, intelligent economy run by meritocrats appointed by the people and accountable to the people, fuelled by reason and with the Public Good as its defining property ... or an undesigned, unintelligent market economy run by unelected rich elites with no accountability to the people, fuelled by irrational exuberance, by greed and fear, boom and bust, with private profit, wealth and power as its defining property? Your choice. Should the people rule (democracy and meritocracy), or the private elites (free-market capitalism and privilege)?

The Natural Deceiver?

Nature does not deceive. Humans misinterpret Nature, hence deceive themselves about Nature. Nature is fully knowable if you speak the language of Nature, and do not misinterpret it via manmade languages and belief systems. Galileo said, "Philosophy is written in that great book which ever lies before our eyes - I mean the universe - but we cannot understand it if we do not first learn the language and grasp the symbols, in which it is written. This book is written in the mathematical language, and the symbols are triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, without whose help it is impossible to comprehend a single word of it; without which one wanders in vain through a dark labyrinth." Mathematics is indeed the language of Nature, and the very fabric of existence. If you do not accept this, you are simply irrational and do not understand the first thing about Nature.

The first task in understanding Existence is not to look to your "experiences", your beliefs, senses, feelings, mystical intuitions, stories (Mythos), holy texts, opinions or interpretations, but to understand how Nature sees itself, what its own language is - entirely independent of the human race - and what Nature is actually made of.

Pythagoras gave the answer two and half thousand years ago: "All things are numbers; number rules all." The eternal things that precede humanity and are wholly independent of the human race are NUMBERS, and thus mathematics. Mathematics IS NATURE, and humanity is so bad at understanding reality because it is so bad at math, and so ignorant of math. Not a single religion of the world has ever proclaimed mathematics as the Truth. They have proclaimed everything other than math to be the "Truth", and have thus told humanity nothing but lies.

The Eschaton

"[Eric Voegelin] identified the root of the Gnostic impulse as alienation, that is, a sense of disconnection from society and a belief that this lack is the result of the inherent disorder, or even evil, of the world. This alienation has two effects:

"The first is the belief that the disorder of the world can be transcended by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a Gnostic Speculation by Voegelin (the Gnostics themselves referred to this as gnosis).

"The second is the desire to implement and or create a policy to actualize the speculation, or Immanentize the Eschaton, i.e., to create a sort of heaven on earth within history.

"According to Voegelin the Gnostics are really rejecting the Christian eschaton of the kingdom of God and replacing it with a human form of salvation through esoteric ritual or practice.

"The primary feature that characterizes a tendency as gnostic for Voegelin is that it is motivated by the notion that the world and humanity can be fundamentally transformed and perfected through the intervention of a chosen group of people (an elite), a man-god, or men-Gods, Übermensch(en), who are the chosen ones that possess a kind of special knowledge (like magic or science) about how to perfect human existence.

"This stands in contrast to a notion of redemption that is achieved through the reconciliation of mankind with the divine. Marxism therefore qualifies as 'gnostic' because it purports that we can establish the perfect society on earth once capitalism has been overthrown by the 'proletariat.' Likewise, Nazism is seen as 'gnostic' because it posits that we can achieve utopia by attaining racial purity, once the master race has freed itself of the racially inferior and the degenerate.

"In the two cases specifically analyzed by Voegelin, the totalitarian impulse is derived from the alienation of the individuals from the rest of society. This leads to a desire to dominate (libido dominandi) which has its roots not just in the Gnostic's conviction of the imperative of his vision but also in his lack of concord with a large body of his society. As a result, there is very little regard for the welfare of those who are harmed by the resulting politics, which ranges from coercive to calamitous (e.g. the Russian proverbs: 'You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette', 'When you chop wood, chips fly)." - Wikipedia

Which side are you on - that of the Abrahamists (Believers) or Gnostics (Knowers) ... those who wait for heaven or those who plan to build heaven?


Libido: "psychic drive or energy"; desire; lust; the instinct for life, growth, reproduction, power, ascent.

The Separation

If democracy (people power) cannot be separated from free-market capitalism (elite power) then it's pointless and a fraud! The people can never be in charge in a world of capital controlled by an elite few. Why isn't that self-evident? Because the elite have constructed a false consciousness in the gullible, credulous, ignorant sheeple so that they believe whatever the elite tell them.

The First Law of Thermodynamic Continuity?

So, does the First Law of Thermodynamics imply that something can erupt out of non-existence for no reason at all and with no explanation at all - as science claims - PROVIDED that the something thereby produced has an equal positive and negative component, meaning that "something" balances to "nothing" (thus ensuring that there's no technical violation of energy conservation)? Doesn't that look like a Sophist's version of the First Law of Thermodynamics, an exercise in clever, specious accounting? If the First Law says that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed, doesn't that MEAN that energy is ETERNAL? Surely it doesn't mean that energy can be summoned out of nothing at all just so long as it never exceeds nothing? That looks incredibly like energy being created from nothing at all, from non-existence!!! In fact, how can that conclusion be avoided?

Isn't the First Law of Thermodynamics about the CONTINUITY of energy? That is, you can't have non-existence (non-energy) discontinuously and miraculously leading to sudden energy production (but of such a nature that the energy produced has zero net effect)? In these terms, the Big Bang, as conceived by science, is emphatically an outrageous and impossible violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics of ontological energy conservation and continuity.

In order to explain away the Big Bang, science has constructed a wholly fraudulent misinterpretation of the First Law of Thermodynamics, whereby energy is not eternally conserved, but, rather, can come and go at will, provided the accountant's energy calculations always have a net effect of zero. Such a universe would be a universe of magic, miracles and total chaos - nothing like the observed universe. Moreover, the absurd Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics allows enormous violations of energy conservation (amounting to borrowing energy from the past and/or future!), provided the violation is rapidly rectified (via energy borrowing being swiftly repaid). Again this is a silly exercise in energy bookkeeping and has no connection with energy in ontological terms.

Anyone who thinks that science's Big Bang, or science's take on quantum mechanics, is compatible with ontological energy conservation is retarded. Go back to bed!

In ontological mathematics, the First Law of Thermodynamics is in fact a mathematical law, not scientific. It describes an infinity of positive sinusoidal waves, negative sinusoidal waves, real sinusoidal waves, and imaginary sinusoidal waves. These are eternal, analytic, immutable, indestructible, immaterial, noumenal, ontological, Platonic waves, outside space and time. They are the invisible, immortal fabric of existence, from which all visible things come. Their total sum is EXACTLY ZERO, and this is true at all times and forever.

Compare and contrast the mathematical First Law of Energy versus the scientific First Law. In the mathematical version, energy in itself is simply mathematical waves - eternal analytic vibrations - which can be neither created nor destroyed. Nor can they be transformed. It's the contingent COMBINATIONS of waves - WAVEFUNCTIONS - that undergo transformation, not the necessary waves themselves. There is an eternal mathematical order of existence, immaterial and outside space and time, outside the entire paradigm of science.

Science, on the other hand, says that non-existence is "unstable" - although it can't explain how or why, or even how such a claim makes any sense. It believes that non-existence can randomly and spontaneously generate existence ... that energy CAN come from nothing (i.e. can be created AND destroyed), provided that it never has any net non-zero value (or doesn't violate any non-zero condition for any sustained length of time).

If you're a rational and intelligent person, you will understand that science's version of the First Law is ridiculous, and the precise opposite of ontological energy conservation. It literally claims that energy can come from nothing, and return to nothing, in complete contradiction of the First Law. It seeks to claim to be consistent with the First Law on the basis that a net result of "nothing" hasn't in fact produced any energy out of nothing, because "nothing" is exactly what remains when the bookkeeping is done. It's an accountant's understanding of energy! This is a spectacularly bogus, specious and fraudulent argument because it has at its core the exact opposite of the true First Law of Energy - that energy is ETERNAL, that nothing necessary can be created, and nothing necessary destroyed.

So, what preceded the Big Bang? According to science, non-existence did, and it magically, miraculously and inexplicably generated the material world of spacetime. The world in effect summoned itself into existence - the most absurd claim ever made in the history of thought, even worse than that "God" created the universe out of nothing!

According to ontological mathematics, on the other hand, an immaterial Fourier frequency domain (Singularity), outside space and time, preceded the Big Bang, and the material world of spacetime was constructed from it out of an inverse Fourier Transform. It's all in the math!

Rationalist ontological mathematicians, unlike irrational scientists, do not have to invoke magic, miracles, randomness, spontaneity, accident, chance, inexplicable wavefunction collapse, indeterminism, acausality, the violation of the First Law of Energy, and all the rest of the garbage that science claims is "rational".

Scientists cannot in any way prove their speculations to be true, and they cannot in any way contradict ontological mathematics, yet they believe science to be the unarguable truth of reality. What a joke! Ontological mathematics utterly, unarguably, rationally, proves that science is false and mathematics true. Do the math!

Scientific materialists are barely more rational than Abrahamists and Karmists, and some of their "explanations" of reality are even worse!

Story People

Humans are story people. They follow story logic and believe the most absurd stories, provided the stories have an internal "logic" that appeals to them, comforts them, and through which they "understand" the world as a great story. The Bible is just a giant story - a novel purporting to be reality and Truth. Just like all popular novels, the Bible contains zero mathematics, zero science, zero philosophy, and zero Logos. It is sheer Mythos from beginning to end, with zero Truth content. It's a compelling emotional extravaganza, and nothing else.

The Smell

Andromache (wife of Hector of Troy) to Helen of Troy: "When you walk in a room, the men smell sex, the women smell death."

Helen: "No, the women smell sex, that is why they detest me. The men smell death and it smells exciting, because it smells like war." (Simon Armitage's The Last Days of Troy)

The God Series

The God Series is the guaranteed answer to everything ... but only if you're smart enough. Why would anyone imagine that the Truth is available to stupid, irrational people, people obsessed with faith, or with their own feelings and experiences, or with mystical intuitions, or their fallible senses? Truth is about reason and only the most intelligent people can use reason properly.

The Illuminati Authors: Mike Hockney, Adam Weishaupt, Michael Faust.

A Curious Thing

It's a curious thing, but many of the people who come to this website are just about the last people we would want to be reading it and taking an interest in it. Their understanding of it is close to zero, and in fact they stand for more or less the opposite of what we advocate. We attract many "spiritual" types, but we endorse hyperrationalism. What a fuck on!

Do not read this website unless you agree that mathematics - the most daunting subject of all, dealing with the two greatest mysteries of all ("nothing" and infinity) - is the only conceivable, rational, analytic answer to the mystery of existence. If you hold any other position, you are an irrationalist and this site contains nothing of value to you.

Islamic State

Modern America was founded by exactly the same kind of people who are now building the "Islamic State" in the Middle East. i.e. religious fanatics, extremists, fundamentalists and grim Puritans, obsessed with the infallibility of their holy text, hated and persecuted in their home countries, and wishing to flee to a new land to build the perfect Holy, Godly Nation, reflecting their sacred Covenant with God.

America, to this day, is full of right wing religious nuts and conspiracy theorists who despise the Government and the Godless State, and imagine Communism and Atheism encroaching everywhere. American "patriots" and the 9/11 "Truth" Movement are - with their constant, insidious YouTube videos spreading their hatred of the State and ludicrous conspiracy theories, all designed to radicalise vulnerable, irrational youths - just the mirror image of the internet-savvy Jihadists ordering young Muslims to rise up against their Governments and States to overthrow them.

The Jihadists want to set up a Koranic caliphate; the American "patriots" want to set up Ayn Rand's ultra-capitalist Market, where Government and the State have been abolished, and everything is run by the market.

It's not Government and the State that need to be overthrown, it's BAD Governments and BAD States, to be replaced by GOOD Governments and GOOD States, serving the public good and Commonwealth. No Government or State led by greedy, selfish, right-wing capitalists who support the private good over the public good can be anything but toxic.

Free-market capitalism has led to the greatest financial inequality in human history. Is that supposed to be progressive and serving the public good? The facts have spoken. Right wing ideology leads to Dictatorship by the rich elites, and the enslavement of the rest of us. All right wingers are Enemies of the People, and the supporters of the tyrants that want to have total power over the people.


"I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature." - Thomas Jefferson

"Question with boldness the existence of God. I do not believe any of the Christian doctrines. The greatest enemies of Jesus [are the doctrines and creeds of the church]." - Thomas Jefferson

Christianity is the least rational religion of them all. It doesn't make any sense at all. Christianity sees its greatest strength as its claim that God incarnated on earth and lived as a human being. This is fantastic in Mythos terms, but is unintelligible and deranged in Logos terms. By definition, God cannot be a human or experience the human condition.

The comic strip character Clark Kent lives as a human, but he's NOT human, KNOWS he's not human, and knows that he can turn into Superman at any time. Such a person has zero true understanding of the human condition because, obviously, you need to be human to have that understanding.

Jesus Christ, if you believe Christianity, was God, and that, automatically means that he wasn't human. Christianity seeks to have its cake and eat it by claiming that God was both fully human and fully divine - a total logical impossibility.

The Narrative

The world is full of people peddling grievance narratives and entitlement narratives. Where is the Hero narrative, the merit narrative, the intelligence narrative, the achievement narrative?


Enlightenment has nothing to do with "peace and love". We arrive at enlightenment via the dialectic, and the dialectic is the most savage thing there is: the exterminatory war of opposites. The dialectic eventually brings us - some of us - to knowledge of reality, and that is the knowledge that reality is made of mathematics and IS mathematics. The Buddha knew nothing about mathematics and denied the existence of the eternal monadic soul via which mathematics is carried ontologically, hence he was a staggeringly unenlightened individual with zero understanding of true reality.

On what basis would any rational person ever choose to be a Buddhist? Buddhism is all about subjective experiences and feelings. It is not a logical, rational, complete and consistent system of ontology and epistemology.

The Trolls

We get innumerable right wing trolls ranting and railing against us. All of them are psychopathic narcissists. They think they're real special, real smart. But special, smart people can point to great accomplishments. Not one of humanity's achievers, of humanity's winners, has ever spent time trolling. People troll because their lives are empty. They're crying out for attention. They're consumed by narcissistic rage and want to big themselves up ... to stop themselves from collapsing. These are eggshell people, waiting to break.

The Triple Problem

Reality is made out of numbers (mathematics), but numbers are information, and information is interpreted as Content ... as sensory data.

Think of the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Every different frequency is associated with a different colour, i.e. each different number (frequency) has a different sensory property. In fact, the whole of reality is based on different frequencies being interpreted in different sensory, emotional and intuitive ways. We don't SEE the frequency (the number), we EXPERIENCE the frequency (as non-number, as informational Content).

Moreover, we "understand" the world via non-numerical, non-mathematical, manmade VERBAL languages, which are ideal for telling stories (Mythos), but useless for dealing with the mathematical Truth of reality (Logos). In other words, our senses, emotions, intuitions and languages all conspire to convince us that reality is anything other than mathematical. Only the finest, brightest, most rational and intelligent minds can cut through all of the phenomenal illusions placed in our path and arrive at the noumenal Truth that the unseen substrate to existence is pure mathematical sinusoidal waves - the ultimate information carriers.

Ontologically, sinusoidal waves ARE numbers, i.e. numbers do not exist as anything other than the frequencies, amplitudes and phases of mathematical waves, and all numbers have non-numerical, sensory and empirical Content associated with them, as we see with the different frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum.

If you accept that this is an information universe, you must accept that something carries the information. Because you encounter the information carried, you do not encounter the information carrier, i.e. you encounter the information as phenomenon and not as noumenon (the information in itself). Mathematical waves are the information in itself, but these can never be detected by anything. They are ontological, noumenal CAUSES, but only their ontological, phenomenal EFFECTS are perceived.

You need to be a rationalist, not empiricist, to grasp that mathematics underlies everything but can NEVER be detected in itself. You need to be a genius to understand this. And, if you don't "get it", you can be sure that all of your opinions about the nature of ultimate reality are utterly false and delusional. Whether you like it or not, mathematics is the SOURCE.

Science uses mathematics all the time. Has science ever explained what mathematics actually is and why it's essential to science? You must be joking. Science can't explain why it has mathematics at its core - i.e. it can't explain itself - yet it purports to be able to explain the universe to us. How ridiculous!

Not a single person outside of the Illuminati has ever explained what mathematics is ontologically, and what numbers are ontologically. If you think you're so smart, go right ahead and explain what mathematics is and how and why it exists at all. Bear in mind that the truths of mathematics are ETERNAL, and that means, of course, that mathematics PRECEDES any human being.

The Choice

You are either for the public good or the private good. If you are a free-market capitalist, you are ipso facto for the private good since capital belongs to the private elites and not to the public.

There's nothing more sickening, hypocritical and fraudulent than free-market capitalists pretending to be on the side of the People. All right-wingers support the private over the public good, and that's because they see much greater opportunity for greed and selfishness if private elites are in charge rather than the public. All right-wingers are friends and allies of the elite 1%, hence they are automatically Enemies of the People.

The Golden Age

According to Hesiod, the Golden Age ended when Prometheus stole the fire of the Gods and gave it to mankind. This act of disobedience is the classical equivalent of the disobedience of Adam and Eve, causing them to be driven out of paradise.

But what Prometheus and Adam and Eve prove is that we do not need Gods, and we ourselves can become Gods.

We are the new Prometheans, the new Faustians. We won't take just the sacred fire from the Gods, but everything they have.

The world is divided into two: those who are on their knees to the Old Gods, and those who are becoming the New Gods. There can be no reconciliation between these two groups. They are diametrically opposed. One group thinks "God" is outside them, and the other that "God" is inside them. There can be no greater difference.


"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci

It's easy to look at the world and see everything in decline and going to hell in a handcart, yet any situation can be transformed ... if you have sufficient will. The intelligentsia have always lacked will and have always taken the cowards' way out and served religious, political, military or economic elites with vastly stronger will. But everything will change when the smart people ally Nietzschean will to their intellect. Nothing will be able to beat them. They will become as Gods.


If you want to picture the "Prophet" Mohammed, think of a man exactly like Abraham, standing over his child, ready to kill it because of a voice in his head commanding him to do it.

Osama bin Laden would have been very like Mohammed. If Mohammed lived today, he would be proclaiming Global Jihad and demanding the global imposition of Sharia Law, cheering on every Muslim terrorist, and ordering them to martyr themselves as they smite the infidels. US special forces would be after him, and he'd probably die in a drone strike.

The First Law of Life

Scientists mock the notion of the "spontaneous generation" of life. Wikipedia says, "Spontaneous generation or anomalous generation is an obsolete body of thought on the ordinary formation of living organisms without descent from similar organisms. Typically, the idea was that certain forms such as fleas could arise from inanimate matter such as dust, or that maggots could arise from dead flesh."

Aristotle said, "[Some animals] spring from parent animals according to their kind, whilst others grow spontaneously and not from kindred stock; and of these instances of spontaneous generation some come from putrefying earth or vegetable matter, as is the case with a number of insects, while others are spontaneously generated in the inside of animals out of the secretions of their several organs."

The remarkable thing is that science, despite its protestations, surely DOES believe in the miraculous generation of life from death, dirt or dust. According to science, life comes about by arranging lifeless atoms in certain ways, and mind from organising mindless atoms in particular ways.

If you think it's irrational to claim that life magically comes from non-life and mind from non-mind then you are obliged to conclude that there is a First Law of Life and Mind, equivalent to the First Law of Thermodynamics, i.e. mind and life can be neither created nor destroyed, only transformed (via consciousness arising from the unconscious, for example, or necessary life shifting from one contingent body to another via reincarnation).

This First Law of Life and Mind is enshrined in Leibniz's Monadology, but is rejected by scientific materialism, according to which life and mind are contingencies that magically emerge - with no conceivable rational explanation, mechanism or precedent - from dust ... dead, inert atoms.

It's truly astounding that scientists consider themselves rational when their arguments are so often shown to be based on magic and miracles, on the utterly inexplicable and illogical.

The Hidden Persuaders

Who are the Hidden Persuaders? Who are the Subliminal Projectors? Who are the False Consciousness Constructors? Who are the practitioners of Subliminal Seduction? Are you one of their victims? How would you know?

Who are the Primers, priming you for their sinister subliminal messages?

Are you the victim of Agency Panic? This is defined as an intense fear that you can be shaped or controlled by powerful forces outside yourself; that you have lost your own agency and are now being manipulated by an external agency.


The Revolution

"The Movement is and always has been a group whose purpose and agenda is to not only revolutionize and rationalize political, economic and social systems, but to do the same with religion and spirituality. No one, with decent critical-thinking skills, can deny that as a whole, the current religious system found on the world stage is not only inadequate but entirely irrational. There are uncounted religious beliefs in our society based purely upon faith. But that's all they are: BELIEFS. You can literally believe anything you want if you try hard enough. That doesn't make it true though - does it?

"That's always been the problem with religion; religious people aren't concerned with cold hard fact or evidence. They want what works, period. They want what's comfortable, what's easy, what they were born and raised on. Once again, just because something works for you, it doesn't always mean it's the best option (or the right one for that matter). Abrahamic religions work perfectly for a lot of people, specifically because they're making big bucks selling pure myth. They are literal dream sellers. Imagine selling people the same reworded and rewoven story - which is made up, time and time again - about a myth which was handed down by their ancestors, who also reworded the story and completely changed the moral: in reward for spiritual salvation and immunity from eternal death. Talk about selling souls!

"You could create the most flashy, dramatic, violent, exciting, thrilling, sexy, scandalous religion in the world and attract millions of followers and make millions of dollars but if it isn't based on logic or immutable truth, then it literally isn't worth one iota in terms of our personal/collective growth and development. In fact, it has the opposite effect: by keeping us distracted and docile using the same classic trick of bread and circuses. L. Ron Hubbard understood that better than anyone, 'You don't get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.' - Hubbard.

"We've already seen and read enough entertainment religion to realize that stories and fables designed to teach us life lessons are the same old strategy that is getting us absolutely nowhere and still continuing to push us ever deeper into the primordial slime. Religion doesn't always have to entertain the emotional reptilian brain. Why not entertain the rational brain with religion? Why not entertain the intelligence? Why not entertain critical, lateral thinking? When is society going to realize that the true religion and the science of the spirit is not about a dead bearded superhuman, a man God, who has laid down irrational rules that where literally MEANT to be broken from the very beginning, thousands and thousands of years ago?!

"People demand truth. People demand proper information. They always will. That's what makes us human. As they say, knowing is half the battle. Seeing how you can't know it all at once and will spend your entire life learning and adapting, what could be more of a sacred cause than that?! What could be a more holy religion than one that requires spending countless hours and years learning all there is to know until we have transcended our own existence? We should never base our decisions regarding something as sacred and important as our own eternal souls on opinionated, manic driven, delusional stories which are as preposterous as the day is long. Regardless, there is at least one religious view on earth which is in fact correct. That is statistically a fact. Someone has to be right. How could there possibly not be a right answer to the great secret of existence? Some have figured it out. Few have solved every mystery. There is an answer. Can you crack the code?

"Christians literally make Christ out to be a superhero. They think he can do ANYTHING. Walk on water - no problem. Turn stones into bread - piece of cake. Heal the blind and raise the dead - a walk in the park. Born of a virgin, rose from the dead on the third day - mere child's play for the lord and savior. But accept people of all faiths, religions, creeds and morals into the pearly gates of paradise? FORGET ABOUT IT!!!! You're asking too much now!

"It's this exact kind of thinking which has allowed Christianity to have flourished so prosperously. If you make Jesus into the perfect hero, which is capable of doing all of the impossible (including save you from anything you want), as long as you are slavishly obedient down to his every last word, repent your sins, and pay up at communion every Sunday, then you have literally made the pitch perfect system for spiritual and social manipulation, as well as deliberate corruption. 'Mass mind control works in mysterious ways' should be their real mantra.

"It doesn't end there. Human beings naturally and inherently crave mythos. They require it. That's why Christianity is so alluring. Mythos is what gives us the spiritual release needed in religion that is not so easily accessible through logic.

"Logos and mathematics have no such effect on irrationally thinking people, (hence why they are completely absent from the superstitious religions). In fact, a race of thinking, reasonable people would have the polar opposite effect on their preposterously corrupt system.

"Abrahamism is so successful because it appeals to instant gratification that our emotions beg for, instead of the long, relentless, demanding, rational path of knowledge.

"And the emotions are of course, the irrational part of our brains. It's fucking genius. Perhaps entertainment and emotional ecstasy needs to be injected into a guise of Illuminism for the sleeping masses to finally wake up.


"God is internal not external. He didn't create you, you create him, (as we all do). God is the collective light of all our souls, creating pure potential, waiting eagerly to be maximized. God is the consciousness within that is responsible for literally everything in our lives. Our bodies are simply vessels and temples for this "holy spirit". Physical reality doesn't tell the whole story. Light can never be physical nor material. Yet without light, all things physical have literally vanished to our senses except to the touch. Color is pure light corresponding to chemicals in the brain based on our visual senses. Thus, darkness represents that which is physical and material.

"God is the dialectical, mathematical synthesis of existence. He is the omega point at the outer most edge of the universe where Gods are transfigured into pure mind and full consciousness. This final process of the great chain of being is called the Omega Point. God then regenerates himself into the lowest form of existence (inanimate matter) via the divine suicide. Ash to ash, as above so below.

"Let the light shine." - TB

Many Paths?

You hear self-appointed "gurus" proclaiming that there are many paths to Enlightenment. Maybe so, but there's only one destination. So, forget the paths ... what is the destination? That's what you need to focus on.

There are many paths to Manhattan, but if you don't take a path that terminates at Manhattan, you will never reach Manhattan. Exactly the same is true of Enlightenment. Enlightenment is a specific state and there are countless paths that DON'T lead you there, so you had better know exactly what path you're on and where it's leading. Or do you imagine that any random path is as good as any other?

One Answer

Existence has only one answer. If you claim that there are as many answers as there are people then: a) you are a total relativist, b) you have denied that there's any Absolute Truth or Absolute Knowledge, c) you have said that any answer is as good as any other, d) you have said that any answer is no truer or falser than any other.

To claim that there are many answers is actually to say that there are no answers. It would be like a mathematics exam where anyone can give any answers they like, and everyone gets a 100% test score. Sure, people have provided "answers", but they are any old answers, and totally meaningless answers.

Therefore, there is only ONE answer. Well, do you know what it is? Where's your analytic, eternal proof? Do you think your "experience", your faith, your senses, your emotions, and your mystical intuitions are going to help you? Dream on! The world is full of idiots who think they know answers but are simply believing their own self-serving propaganda. 

Hanging Around

On any Facebook page discussing Illuminism, you will find several cretinous trolls who do nothing but badmouth this website and post literally hundreds of messages denouncing it in every possible way. Many of them say that the Illuminati doesn't exist. Well, isn't it very odd to spend time hanging around Facebook pages devoted to a non-existent, a total fantasy? If you "know" that it's all nonsense, why haven't you moved on? Isn't it utterly perverse behaviour to spend your life devoted to something that you yourself have proudly proclaimed doesn't exist? What kind of person obsessively posts hundreds of messages regarding an absurd fiction?

You are defined by your behaviour, by your actions, by what you do with your time. So, those people that deride this website have decided that the most important thing in their entire life is to deride this website (!). This is the task to which they have devoted themselves. They literally don't do anything else. They are posting their sniping, carping, cynical, skeptical comments all day long. What sad and pathetic lives these people have. They have nothing positive in their lives. They feel compelled to commit their whole lives to negativity, to slagging things off, to destruction, to trolling, to trying to aggravate people and creating doubt and cynicism.

When you go to any Facebook page, you always have a choice: to be positive or negative. All psychologically healthy people seek out Facebook pages where they can be positive. But what about the sick people, the mentally ill people? Well, they seek out Facebook pages where they can be as negative as possible. They LOVE being negative. They feel empowered by it. They get off on ridiculing people, bullying people, bigging themselves up and putting others down. They are looking for their narcissistic codependents.

They are desperate for you to bow to them, to tell them they are right and you are wrong. It infuriates them if you don't acknowledge their "brilliance", the "fact" that they have seen through all the bullshit, that they alone haven't been duped, yet you most certainly have. They spend their time being negative - on Facebook pages with which they have zero sympathy or empathy - because their real purpose is to exercise power over YOU. That's what thrills them. They don't want to go to Facebook pages with which they agree because then no one would notice them. Their "talent" is for attacking and contradicting, nor for agreeing and cooperating.

Any Facebook page that gives a platform to such people is anti-Illuminist, and actively helping hawk predators to attack Illuminism. Illuminism is about retaliating against psychopathic hawks, and if you don't retaliate then you are not an Illuminist.

Anyone who posts hundreds of anti-Illuminist messages should be blocked from any Facebook page purporting to have Illuminist sympathies. There are no end of places for people to attack the Illuminati. Why aren't these trolls on those pages? Because that would be no fun for them. If you tolerate these people, it's purely because you're a pathetic, submissive narcissistic codependent.

Now and again, people try to contact us. We always ignore any such people if we have noted that they subscribe to Facebook pages that are full of anti-Illuminist trolls. We have better things to do with our time than waste it on sad sacks and losers. We engage with positive people, not with trolls and their fellow travellers and codependents.

Only the worst human beings are attracted to constant negativity and to being where they are not wanted. If you tolerate these people, you're as bad as they are. As Edmund Burke said, "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

Equally, "All that is necessary for the triumph of trolling predators is that their victims do nothing." We see several allegedly pro-Illuminist Facebook pages that look exactly like anti-Illuminist pages given that so many trolls are posting on these pages. Any such pages ought to close down. If administrators can't block trolls, they ought to give up. We ourselves closed down our Facebook page because we had better things to do than read messages by trolls, and to be forever engaged in blocking these pointless, negative people.


Think of your own behaviour. Do show up every day on a Facebook page to pour out negativity and cynicism? And if you wouldn't do it, why do you think that any decent person would? You have to remove toxic influences from your life, and that means getting as far from trolls as you can. If you have any trolls as Facebook friends, you're as bad as they are. You're reinforcing them. If you can't recognise a troll, it's because you're one ... or one of their codependents.


Get your kink on ... Sex for Salvation!!! Only in kink is the true nature of your sexual partner revealed ... and your own nature. Only kink frees you from the politically correct, vanilla bullshit, from the Persona World of fakes, phoneys and frauds, of everyone pretending to be something they're not. In kink, all the masks drop and your true self is revealed.


"If only I could disprove the AC site, everyone would see how great and powerful I am." - predator narcissist

"If..." - the AC site (with thanks to the Spartans!)

Everyone on earth is welcome to attempt to disprove ontological mathematics. Good luck with that! Of course, you'd actually have to be intelligent and know what you're talking about to even try ... which rules out all the predator narcissists. All they ever blabber on about is "Satan" and their "experiences" and their idiotic beliefs. Not once do they mention mathematics, science or philosophy. To discuss these things, you must actually have knowledge. Bullshit and anecdotes don't cut it.

Knowledge versus Belief

People KNOW that 1 + 1 = 2. Christians BELIEVE that Jesus Christ is GOD. They do not KNOW this. They have no evidence or proof for this claim. All non-Christians do not believe it.

1 + 1 = 3 is a belief. There's nothing to stop people from holding such a belief, but it has absolutely nothing to do with knowledge.

It's astounding how many people don't know the difference between knowledge and belief. Belief is DEFINED as an acceptance that something is true without any evidence, proof, reason or logic. Knowledge is that which is accepted as true on the basis of evidence, proof, reason or logic, i.e. it's the exact opposite of belief.

People who despise knowledge like to claim that mathematics is a belief system, and thus they prove that they have zero understanding of both mathematics and knowledge. These people literally know nothing. They are people of faith only. They do not accept that knowledge is knowledge. They regard 1 + 1 = 2 as a contingent belief rather than as a necessary, incontrovertible fact! You cannot argue with such people. They are wholly irrational.

You cannot BELIEVE in knowledge. Knowledge is knowledge precisely because it does not involve belief. A belief can be converted into knowledge if and only if evidence or proof emerges that vindicates it. And knowledge can be found to be based on belief if it contains some element for which there is no rational ground. Science, for example, has a belief that what preceded the Big Bang was non-existence, capable of spontaneously creating existence.

Knowledge, like belief, need not be correct, but, no matter what, it must have a basis other than belief. The only knowledge that is infallible and absolute - literally incontestable - is the complete and consistent knowledge of ontological mathematics.



Termination Point

"The doctor developed a way to open up a wormhole to another dimension that we call Null Space. It's a kind of limbo that runs parallel to our world. When you leave Null Space you can emerge at any point in the universe. ... It also has time travel properties. You can go backwards or forwards in time. The doctor teleported the plane to Null Space. It went in, but didn't come out." - from the movie TERMINATION POINT, about an exponential spacetime crisis that could potentially bring about the end of the universe.

In terms of ontological mathematics, the "Null Space" is actually the immaterial frequency domain, outside space and time.

Eternal Energy

So, all you worshippers of science, does the First Law of Thermodynamics state that you can genuinely never create or destroy energy, as ontological mathematics asserts, or that you can create and destroy energy as much as you like, provided that there is no sustained net effect, as science claims.

To put it another way, ontological mathematics says that there's an eternal order of energy, thus an eternal ontology and epistemology, which has an EXACT (mathematical) net effect of zero, while science says that existence can randomly, spontaneously, miraculously and inexplicably leap out of non-existence, just so long as no net effect is ultimately left behind, implying an entirely different ontology and epistemology.

Well, go on, all you geniuses who think you know shit about science, which version is right, which version is more rational and logical?

Not a single scientist anywhere on earth has ever dared to answer this question, and none ever could. Can you do any better? Are you fucking hard enough and tough enough?

It's very simple, if energy is eternal - and can be neither created nor destroyed under ANY circumstances - then the WHOLE of scientific materialism immediately falls. Its basic ontology and epistemology are 100% false. That's a fact.

If science cannot define energy properly, it can't define anything properly.

What came before the Big Bang? If energy is eternal then it automatically follows that immaterial, non-spacetime energy preceded the Big Bang, i.e. frequency (mental) energy in an immaterial Singularity outside space and time. Otherwise, the Big Bang magically summoned itself out of nothing at all, for no reason at all, as science ludicrously and irrationally claims.

Can you DISPROVE what we have said about the TRUE - mathematical - version of the First Law? Good luck with that. If you can't, why are you a slavish believer in the quasi-religion of science? You're a person of faith, not of reason and knowledge.

It's a zero-sum game between science and ontological mathematics. If one is right, the other is automatically wrong. Math doesn't need science at all ... but where would science be without math? So, which is the senior partner ... which actually tells you about fundamental reality? It's a no-brainer for any rational person, but that excludes scientific materialists. Like religious fanatics, they dogmatically refuse to engage with questions such as these, and never draw any attention to them.


Where is your scientific method to resolve this issue? Ho, ho, ho. Good luck with that!

Up and Down

Who's up, who's down? The rich are always up, and you are always down! Haven't you figured it out yet?

Apes, Humans and Evolution

If we have all evolved from some apelike ancestor, why should we conclude that we have all evolved equally? Aren't some of us still close to the apes, and some of us further removed? If some apes remind us of humans, isn't it the case that some humans remind us of apes?

The Lost Cause?

"If we take the widest and wisest view of a Cause, there is no such thing as a Lost Cause because there is no such thing as a Gained Cause. We fight for lost causes because we know that our defeat and dismay may be the preface to our successors' victory, though that victory itself will be temporary; we fight rather to keep something alive than in the expectation that anything will triumph." - T. S. Eliot

Reality Check

While a glittering Roman general was enjoying a glorious Triumph through the thronged streets of Rome, a slave stood behind him and whispered in his ear, "All this will pass. You are nothing but dust."

Isn't that what someone needs to tell today's super rich?

Free Speech

Winston Churchill said, "Where there is a great deal of free speech there is always a certain amount of foolish speech."

In today's world, free speech leads to an avalanche of foolish speech. Social networking has released the greatest tidal wave of idiocy in human history. Where fools used to be placed in the corner wearing a Dunce's cap, now they pontificate on everything under the sun on the internet. Facebook and Twitter have given maximum expression and liberation to mental illness. Many people who arrive at this website have come here for all the wrong reasons, to get validation of their mad ideas and beliefs. When you read Facebook pages dealing with Illuminism, you can't help but notice that many of the contributors are clearly mentally ill, and not far removed from believing in fairies.

Illuminist pages also attract trolls in droves. These are people whose only desire is to wreck, destroy, mock, ridicule, pour out negativity and contempt. They have zero positive contribution to make. They have no constructive instincts whatsoever and are always exclusively driven by bitterness, hatred and revenge. They consider themselves "inside dopesters" ... people who imagine that they know what's going on in the world and can't be duped - but they are in fact just clueless dopes who get fooled all the time, mostly by themselves, by their own arrogance and closed minds.

They say things such as a book can be taken seriously only if it's written by a recognised authority with a reputation to uphold. This is the classic fallacy of the "appeal to authority" - the idiotic belief that only recognised "experts" can ever be right, and what they say is automatically superior to what anyone else says. Of course, every single great advance in history has been produced by geniuses attacking the received wisdom, overthrowing the claims of the established experts and rendering their dinosaur views obsolete.

Why do billions of people still believe in ludicrous ancient religions? It's exactly because they too look to "authorities" to tell them what and how to think. These people can't think for themselves, can't use their own reason. A reputation counts for nothing if you're wrong. An expert is only an expert until he's not. The only subject that deals in infallibility is ontological mathematics.

Trolls have only one instinct - to use whatever argument suits their case at a particular moment. One moment, they revere "authorities". The next moment, they will quote from some wacky guru, or even put forward their own weird and wonderful beliefs. You can't have it both ways. If you think that only books by establishment experts count then you are obliged to parrot their opinions at all times because you yourself have no right to make any claims since you are not a recognised expert. Why would we listen to the parrots when we can listen to the "experts" themselves? You ought to become voiceless if you have declared that only the establishment's chosen experts can be right.

But trolls are never worried by consistency, logic and reason. They say whatever is expedient to their trolling activities, whatever can put other people down and big themselves up. Their own narcissism is always their primary and indeed exclusive preoccupation.

Trolling is one of the most unfortunate aspects of the modern world, and a total abuse of "free speech". Free speech mustn't be allowed to degenerate into "foolish speech", or it will become utterly valueless, and even dangerous. It will represent an immense obstacle to human progress, the opposite of what free speech was supposed to accomplish.

Pro-Illuminist sites should have zero tolerance towards trolling. Trolling is certainly a kind of "free speech", but not a kind that any rational person would endorse. When was the last time you found a troll improving the human condition with their toxic outpourings?

Trolls want to use "freedom" to destroy others, not to improve the world. Is that really the type of freedom that meritocrats want to support?

The Meaning of Number

Number, ontologically, is energy. Numbers are frequencies of sinusoidal waves. They are not abstract pencil marks you make on a piece of paper. Waves - i.e. numbers - comprise the fabric of existence. We exist in an ocean of waves, numbers, information, energy. They all mean the same thing. NUMBERS ARE WAVES. WAVES ARE

Inheritance Tax

DH: "100% inheritance tax? Ahahaha! Good luck making that a reality!"

Allowing 80 people to have as much wealth as 3.5 billion people. Ahahaha! Good luck making that a reality! .... oops, it has already happened!


What's the point of "Illuminist" pages that give a platform to parasites, living off the leftovers of the dead?

The War

Occupy Wall Street opposes Big Business (Capitalism).

The Tea Party opposes Big Government (Democracy).

Which side are you on?

There's no such thing as "capitalist democracy". There is either capitalism (private power) or democracy (public power). Which side are you on?

Perfect Clarity

The awesome, indestructible, indomitable, indisputable CLARITY of mathematics. Nothing else is clear. Everything else involves seeing through a glass darkly.


Illuminati "Researchers"

David Icke believes himself an expert regarding the "Illuminati" - shapeshifting, pan-dimensional alien lizards, apparently. He's an expert in his own fabrication of the "Illuminati", not in anything to do with the actual Illuminati.

"Researchers" are self-declared "experts" in researching the gossip, rumours, speculation, conspiracy theories and memes regarding societies such as the Illuminati. They have no actual knowledge of these societies and their deep backgrounds. How could they? They're not members, so everything they say can be dismissed as pure speculation, fuelled by their personal, political, religious and economic agendas.

The Illuminati were originally condemned as left-wing, anti-Catholic, anti-monarchy, anti-rich fanatics (French Revolutionary Jacobins). Today, they are routinely portrayed as Jesuits, monarchists, bankers, Jews, crony capitalists, Washington D.C. politicians, and so on, i.e. the 100% opposite of the original portrayal. When this happens, you can be sure that you're dealing with people's projections, which have no basis in reality.

"Illuminati" is simply the label given to some allegedly unseen group controlling the world, onto which conspiracy theorists project all of their hatred and frustration. People such as Alex Jones and David Icke relentlessly stoke people's fears and paranoia and make a very healthy living from doing so. They don't write books about philosophy, science and ontological mathematics!

The people running the world are no mystery. All you have to do is follow the money. Who are the small group of eighty people who have as much wealth as three and a half billion people? That's who is running the world! Duh! 1 + 1 = 2.


Illuminism is about ontological mathematics, and always has been. Pythagoras was the first ontological mathematician. You won't find any mention of ontological mathematics outside the God Series. What does that tell you? It tells you that this material cannot have been borrowed from any other source in the world, and that means that either some random person invented ontological mathematics in the last few years - the most astounding intellectual feat of all time - or that the God Series reflects an ancient source of secret knowledge, accumulated by humanity's finest minds. Well, which is it?

The question you always have to ask yourself is whether this material is available anywhere else and could have been copied from anywhere else. If not, it's genuine.

All fakes and frauds are copies or obvious fantasies (such as those of David Icke). You can't create a fantasy regarding ontological mathematics. Mathematical claims are either right or wrong. You can't hide behind Mythos. You're in pure Logos territory.

We note that not one troll has ever attacked our Logos material. Not one has ever shown any awareness at all of ontological mathematics. All they blabber on about is "Satan". Who is Satan? Satan is the Demiurge: Jehovah, Jesus Christ, Allah - the "God" of Abrahamism. We are those who call for the complete abolition of Abrahamism and thus Satanism. We are not the Satanists ... the trolls are!!!

Any of our critics who does not mention ontological mathematics has no credibility, and to understand ontological mathematics you would need to have total knowledge of the millions of words of the God Series, including the remaining books of the series that have not yet been published. The trolls have no knowledge whatsoever of the God Series. The entire extent of their knowledge regarding us is a few pages they've skimmed read of this website.

People always hate and fear what they don't understand. They feel a tremendous compulsion to rubbish it so that they don't have to worry about it. Imagine if you took Illuminism seriously. You would then have about five million words to read, regarding material of which you have no knowledge, and which is staggeringly complex, dealing as it does with the mathematical fabric of existence itself.

Rather than go down that rabbit hole, the morons and trolls simply shout, "It's fake, phoney, fraudulent, nonsense, fabricated, idiotic, Satanic, evil, copied, based on the writings of Crowley ... or whatever." Not once do they engage with ontological mathematics. They don't even know what it is, and they're certainly not going to spend any time finding out because then they would have to admit that everything they believe about reality is false.

You must be humble when you approach Truth and Knowledge, and stupid trolls are NEVER humble. They are always self-serving narcissists, and they only like things that they can use for their own advantage. Truth and Knowledge are of no use to them, and they don't want to talk about them. They want to talk about their experiences and beliefs, and nothing else.

The AC site can actually be used as a means of detecting narcissists. Anyone who rails against, while showing no substantive knowledge of its enormous content, is plainly a narcissistic psycho troll. They have a real problem with the AC site because they are so intimidated by it. They know that if we succeed, they fail. It's a zero-sum game.

In the new world, the trolls, narcissists and psychopaths will be powerless and marginalised. Talented, positive, constructive men and women will be running the world, and the rulers of the old world will be in zoos, safely shut away from decent people. They won't be able to pull anyone down anymore. The Age of the Troll and Bully will be over once and for all, cured by the Age of Reason.


Whistleblowers don't stand a chance. The people they are blowing the whistle against are the ones in charge, the ones who will be "investigating" their complaint. We all know how that's going to turn out, don't we?

Meritocracy versus Religious Faith

ST: "I want meritocracy that will not be controlled by anti-religion government. I want a meritocracy which gives anyone the freedom to choose his religion."

Let's get this crystal clear. Mainstream religion - Abrahamism or Karmism - is totally incompatible with meritocracy. No one who believes that some people are going to eternal paradise and others to eternal hell depending on what absurd fantasy-God they believe in has any place in a rational meritocracy. No one who believes in a caste system has any place in a rational meritocracy. No one who believes that people are being controlled like puppets by the actions of their past lives has any place in a rational meritocracy. Meritocracy is not about perpetuating the Old World Order. It's about replacing it with a New World Order. Faith must be abolished.

The last thing that any meritocratic State would ever tolerate is exactly the kind of religious mania that has made meritocracy necessary in the first place, as its cure! Absolutely never tell anyone that meritocracy is not opposed to mainstream religious faith. It emphatically is. In a meritocracy, no one can be free to believe that some meritocrats are going to hell for disagreeing with them.

Religious faith is 100% incompatible with meritocracy. If you don't agree, you should leave the meritocratic movement immediately because, self-evidently, decrepit, evil old religions are more important to you than rationalist meritocracy.

Meritocracy is about eradicating insane beliefs, not condoning and perpetuating them in the name of some absurd multi-cultural political correctness. We don't respect people of religious faith. They are the enemy, not our allies! How dumb do you have to be to give these religious nuts the time of day? We ARE against them, and we make no apologies for that, just as they make no apologies for saying that we are all going to hell.

Get real, people. Stop living in La La land. This is not a liberal world full of pacifist doves. It's a dialectical bloodbath where hawks will prey on you and pick your bones without a moment's hesitation. We don't want any Abrahamists anywhere near our movement.


The Movement

You don't have to formally join anything to become a member of The Movement. If you agree with its agenda, you simply assume the identity of one of our activists. The same goes for the Illuminati. You are welcome to call yourself an Illuminatus if you agree with the manifesto set out on this very large and daunting website.

The Movement will succeed only if it attracts self-creating, self-defining, ambitious, intelligent, self-motivating, self-initiating, natural-born leaders.

You don't need permission to become an activist for The Movement. You just go ahead and do whatever you think can advance the interests of The Movement.

The Movement is about releasing your creativity. The trouble with the world is that it's so lacking in creativity, unless it involves brainless internet memes. People seem to have limitless energy and interest in producing trivia and junk. All of that goes out of the window when anything serious is demanded. Humanity has a Triviality Gene of awesome proportions, rivalled only by the Trolling Gene for totally negative people with an instinct solely for destruction.

Well, can you do anything serious minded? Can you make a difference? Can you create? Or you one of life's spectators, bystanders, anonymous faces in the crowd, and perpetual understudies? Are other people on the stage of world events, but never you?

Many people think they are great ... until they are asked to do something great. And then the penny finally drops ... they are clueless nobodies who can't do anything at all. Their abilities stop at posting incoherent message on Facebook and Twitter. That's the limit of their ability to influence the world. They are Ignavi, one and all.

The Movement is about attracting those with actual talent, those with real energy, those who can manage to do things rather than just talking about it and deluding themselves that they can do it.

The smarter and more talented you get, the fewer peers you will have. That's the price of being much cleverer and meritorious than the people around you. Those who found the Grail were peerless.


The task is to set up autonomous cells of The Movement, via individuals or like-minded groups of friends, but not to generate a large, unwieldy organisation where people get bogged down in "politics" and "committees", and where "analysis paralysis" kills all energy.

Don't worry about activism. Just do it. Do whatever you're good at, and into which you can pour your energy. Don't worry about making mistakes. You will make plenty of them. Learn from them and move on. Mistakes are essential in dialectical development and evolution. Every time you fail, you will fail a bit better (i.e. less badly), and eventually you won't fail at all. You will be one of life's successes.

As JFK said, "Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Well, are you daring enough?

What Do We Stand For?

We want to see the end of all of the world's old, decrepit, psychotic religions. This is the twenty-first century, and ancient superstitions and tribal "Commandments" have no right to be here.

We want to see the end of predatory capitalism - the economic system designed to allow a tiny, greedy, infinitely selfish, narcissistic and psychopathic elite to rule over the rest of us and establish great dynasties of wealth and power that rule over us in perpetuity.

We want every person on earth to be given a proper chance to demonstrate their merit, and rise as high as their talent warrants, without any invisible obstacles being placed in their path, without having to take part in a game rigged against them, and be the victim of unseen cartels pulling all of the strings on behalf of chosen (privileged) players.

We want the smartest and most talented human beings to be leading the world since it would be insane to want stupid and untalented people at the top - as we currently have.

We have a world where the Peter Principle applies ... the people at the top have been promoted beyond their level of competence, but there's no one above them to fire them, and they refuse to be fired by those below them. We need to ensure that every inept person in an influential position is accountable to the people and can be easily fired.

We are for public control of society, not private control. Capitalism is an economic designed to bring about the rule of the public sphere by the private sphere, via the "market", which is unelected and unaccountable to the people, and in which the people have no representation and no say. Free-market capitalism is the exact means by which democracy is sabotaged and subverted, and the people prevented from controlling their own destiny.

You can have rule by the people, or rule by private markets, but you can't have both. Which is it to be? You MUST choose.

We want the scientific and mathematical methods to be extended to economic policy, social policy, religious policy, drug policy, education policy, health policy, police policy, and so on. We want the end of moralising and sermonising. We want the end of pious, pompous, sanctimonious preacher people prattling on about their Stone Age moral codes and beliefs.

We want the end of parental abuse of children via religious indoctrination, and even physical mutilation of babies (circumcision).

We want the end of crazy parents being allowed to bring up crazy children, made crazy by their parents' crazy beliefs.

We want faith to be abolished, to be treated with no respect at all. Reason must be the new standard.

We want a Logos Society and an Age of Reason. Mythos must be consigned to the arena of harmless entertainment.

We want a Second and Final Enlightenment where humanity at last frees itself of the cancer of ancient religious myths, which have done more damage to the human psyche than anything else. Ancient religions made, and continue to make, billions of people deranged.

We can build heaven on earth, but only through reason, knowledge and an intellectually optimised human race. It shows how retarded the human race is that there are billions of people who despise the notion of the maximisation of human intelligence as the primary goal of government policy.

What can you do with a humanity that loves being stupid and has absolute contempt for intelligence, and no interest in it at all?

We live in a world where money, not intelligence, is the driving force, and those with money are never going to give up their power to let the smartest take over. The question is very simple ... what are the smartest going to do about it? Do they have the will to take over from the rich? In Star Trek, that's exactly what happened.

Humanity's future must be as an intelligent, meritocratic, rational species, not as a religious species on its knees to invisible gods, or a capitalist species enslaved and owned by the super rich.

If you oppose us, it's for a simple reason ... you yourself are irrational and unintelligent, and you know you will not prosper in a competition with smart people. You will be the dialectical opposition to us. That's the nature of the world. For us to succeed, you must fail. And you shall! Be in no doubt about it.

We are on the side of dialectical progress and no power on earth can withstand that. We are the future of humanity whether you like it or not. We are Humanity 2.0. You are the dinosaurs, waiting to become extinct, waiting for your trip to the cosmic abattoir.

Get Real

Get Active

Get Going.

The Fact

Whether anyone likes it or not, the following terms are inevitably going to become synonymous: The Illuminati, Illuminism, Meritocracy, The Movement, The Dialectic, The Republic of Laws, The Social Contract, The Monadology, The Second Enlightenment, The Age of Reason, Logos, Ontological Mathematics. All of them go together indissolubly. While it might be desirable for terms such as "Meritocracy" to be completely separated from the name "Illuminati", with all of the baggage that word now carries, the enemies of Meritocracy will insist on making the connection, just as they will insist on linking 100% inheritance tax - the fundamental basis of a rational, meritocratic world opposed to privilege, cronyism, nepotism and hereditary rule and power - with either fascism or communism in order to discredit it. That's the way the world works.

You have to be prepared to defend the whole rationalist agenda, or not at all. The war is between a rationalist, Logos future for humanity and the continuation of an emotional, sensory, mystical, Mythos humanity, as we currently have.

Meritocracy must be about a revolution in the nature of the human race and how it operates, or it's just another silly, pointless fringe activity. It must be allied to a radically new vision of humanity and its destiny, or has zero chance of succeeding.

The world is already full of powerful systems: Abrahamism, Karmism, Democracy, Monarchy, and Free-Market Capitalism. Meritocracy can never succeed unless it inspires people much more than any of these others, and that means it must aspire to be an all-embracing formula for transforming the human condition. It cannot be just another marginal political party and pressure group.

Meritocrats must have Grand Vision. Anything else is certain to fail. No one is going to become attracted to meritocracy unless they see it as the definitive, dialectically inevitable cure for all of humanity's ills. Marxism cast itself in exactly those terms, and became massively influential. But Marxism was merely a dialectical thesis, opposed in due course by capitalist democracy (the antithesis). Meritocracy is the preordained final synthesis, the cure for both communism and capitalism. Meritocracy is the End of History, i.e. the final stage of human politics. There will be nothing after Meritocracy.


Thanks to the endless propaganda directed against the Illuminati, most people have completely forgotten what the word "Illuminati" actually means. The Illuminati are the "Enlightened Ones" ... those committed to and seeking Enlightenment. If you aspire to a Second Enlightenment, a true Age of Reason, then you yourself are an Illuminatus.

Why would a group of selfish, endarkened, greedy, capitalist elitists - the actual people who are self-evidently running the world - choose the name "Illuminati" for themselves? They obviously didn't, and they obviously wouldn't. The only people who would call themselves the Illuminati are those who are preoccupied with the light, with enlightenment - intellectuals interested in the betterment of humanity, not narcissistic psychopaths who want to enslave humanity, and pass all of their power and wealth down their dynastic line forever.

Illuminism, which is really just a different name for Gnosticism, has never been about anything other than knowledge, reason, intellect, and understanding how reality operates in order to defeat those who deserve to be defeated ... the Power Elite, the Old World Order.

It shows how successful the propaganda machine of the OWO is that is has portrayed their Nemesis as the bad guys. Are you stupid enough to believe what the Elite's media machine - and their puppet conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones and David Icke - tells you?

The Ways of the World

"The public have an insatiable curiosity to know everything, except what is worth knowing." - Oscar Wilde

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde

"Everything popular is wrong." - Oscar Wilde

"Popularity is the one insult I have never suffered." - Oscar Wilde

"A man who does not think for himself does not think at all." - Oscar Wilde

"If you keep doing what you've always done, you'll keep getting what you've always got ... and you'll keep feeling what you've always felt." - Unknown

"It's not the truth that hurts us but letting go of the lies." - Unknown

"I would rather fail in a cause that will ultimately triumph than to triumph in a cause that will ultimately fail." - Jim Elliot

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give." - Norman MacEwan

"If there is hope in the future, there is power in the present." - John Maxwell

"Nothing changes if nothing changes." - Unknown

"To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all." - Oscar Wilde

"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions..." - Oscar Wilde

"The world is a stage and the play is badly cast." - Oscar Wilde

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"You see things as they are and say, 'Why?' But I dream of things that never were and say, 'Why not?'" - George Bernard Shaw

"Do you deserve truth? You sure seek it, but do you deserve it? If you want to see real things burning you first have to reach up to the height of the fire." - Nietzsche

"If you haven't found something you are willing to die for, you aren't fit to live." - Martin Luther King, Jr.


"Never regret thy fall,

O Icarus of the fearless flight

For the greatest tragedy of them all

Is never to feel the burning light." - Oscar Wilde

We Shall Not Serve

We are not here to serve the Elite. We are not here to kneel. We are not here to bow. We are not here to grovel. We are not here to beg.

Are you one of the deluded masses that believe that the rich elites deserve their loot? As Balzac said, "Behind every great fortune lies a great crime." The Elite are the criminals who didn't get caught, those who chose and bought the judge, the jury and the law itself.

Will you go on playing a game rigged against you? If you do, you're the worst of losers. You're pathetic. You're a loser now and forever. You WANT to be a loser. If you didn't, you would change the game to ensure that you had as good a chance of winning as anyone else. No person from an unprivileged background can expect to succeed in a world ruled by privilege. 1 + 1 = 2.

It's time to revalue all values, to reboot the world, to reload the program for this world. What are you going to do? Are you just going to bleat about life, or are you going to act, to DO SOMETHING?

The world is full not of the Can-Dos but the Can-Do-Nothings.

Go on, justify your existence. Demonstrate even one creative thing you have ever done. Show in what way you have made a difference. Show how you have risen above the Ignavi.

There is no way this world can change unless the Elite are toppled. So, we ask you again, are you for or against the Elite? What are you going to do to remove them? Are you for or against 100% inheritance tax, the tax that breaks the power and wealth of the Elite once and for all? Anyone who opposes this tax is a friend and ally of the Elite, and an Enemy of the People.

Your choice is simple. Demand 100% inheritance tax. Do not take part in capitalist democracy. Do not serve the Elite. Demand the end of ancient, decrepit, pathetic religions. Demand the Second Enlightenment.


The Choice

All of us are here in this world. That's a hard fact. So, what are you going to do with your life - use it or waste it? Are you going to make a difference, have an impact, give a point to your existence? Or are you going to drift and bumble along ... be one of the massed legions of monochrome mediocrities and nonentities that vanish into the background? Will you be one of the Invisible Men with which the world is full? They come and go and no one notices whether they were here or not. They live without praise or blame, as Dante put it. They are the grey people, the blank people, the people who don't know what to do with the gift of life. The Movement isn't for such people. The Movement is only for the ambitious, for achievers, for those who want to change the world, for those who admire world-historic figures, and want to be one themselves. Are you capable of greatness, or are you one of the weak, meek, pathetic, apathetic, lazy, inept, unambitious, uninspiring hordes who just want to dissolve into the ether, as if you had never been in the world at all? It's your choice, no one else's. It's your move.

We all have an inner fire. It's time to light yours. It's time to set yourself ablaze. Find those who can stoke and fan your flames to create a great pyre that lights up the world. Be a burning Viking Longship pushing out to sea, a blazing star shooting through the heavens, a mighty flaming beacon illuminating everything around it. Break on through to the other side ... your divine side.