Free Will and Will to Power (The God Series Book 17)

Are you free, or are you a machine that suffers from a delusion that it's free? Free will is perhaps the most important subject of all because if we are authentically free, scientific materialism is ipso facto false, and the world is in urgent need of a revolutionary paradigm shift. This book shows that free will has a most unexpected advocate - mathematics. Only in a mathematical universe can we be free. Only in a mathematical universe can we have a soul. And in a mathematical universe, free will is much better understood as will to power, and to have an intimate connection with cosmic symmetry and "God". It's all in the math!

The greatest catastrophe in intellectual history was to regard physics as real and mathematics as an unreal abstraction. In fact, mathematics is noumenal (true) reality, and physics is phenomenal (illusory) reality. Mathematics tells you what things are in themselves, and physics tells you how they appear to us. Mathematics is the perfect ground of existence, defined by the God Equation. It's the source of causation, determinism and objective reality; all of the things now formally denied by physics, which claims that observable reality is indeterministically born of unreal, probabilistic wavefunctions.

It's time to replace the scientific method with the mathematical method. It's time to recognize that true reality is intelligible, not sensible; noumenal, not phenomenal; unobservable, not observable; metaphysical, not physical; hidden, not manifest; rationalist, not empiricist; necessary, not contingent. Physics is literally incapable of detecting true reality since true reality is an eternal, indestructible, dimensionless mathematical Singularity, outside space and time. The Singularity is a precisely defined Fourier frequency domain. There's nothing "woo woo" about it. It's pure math.

Physicists suffer from a disorder of the mind that causes them to believe that sensible, temporal objects have more reality than eternal, immutable Platonic mathematical objects, and to place more trust in their senses than in their reason, more trust in the scientific method of "evidence" than the mathematical method of eternal proof.

Never forget that sensory objects are just ideas in the mind. According to quantum physics, objects are just the observable entities produced by the collapse of unreal wavefunctions, and don't formally exist when they are not being observed. Niels Bohr, in response to Einstein, literally denied that the moon existed when it wasn't being observed.

The subject that comes after physics is metaphysics, and the true language of metaphysics is ontological mathematics. Physics is the phenomenal expression of noumenal mathematics.

Mathematics has one final wonder to confer on us. It provides a complete definition of the human soul, which is, like the universe in itself, just an immaterial, dimensionless mathematical singularity defined by the God Equation. As above, so below. The soul is the microcosm and the universe the macrocosm.

Anyone who denies that reality is 100% mathematical is simply too stupid for the truth. Truth is not a democracy. It's not for everyone, only for humanity's smartest individuals. As Robert Heinlein said, "Democracy can't work. Mathematicians, peasants, and animals, that's all there is - so democracy, a theory based on the assumption that mathematicians and peasants are equal, can never work. Wisdom is not additive; its maximum is that of the wisest man in a given group."

This book comprehensively exposes the diabolical philosophical illiteracy, ignorance, bankruptcy and irrationalism of modern scientific "thinking", most spectacularly evident in the paradox of Schrödinger's cat, the standard interpretation of which is more or less indistinguishable from insanity, yet is taught as "fact" (but is nothing but an extremist expression of empiricist philosophy).

Ontological mathematicians are vastly more intelligent than physicists. It's all in the math!

"Wisdom is sold in the desolate market where none come to buy." - William Blake

The God Series is entirely ignored by all but a handful of audacious souls with open minds. You should always be proud of yourself if you study new ideas without being told to do so by popes, priests, gurus, celebrities, "authorities", or the mob. Scientists would never dream of reading the God Series. Yet they would all read it if Stephen Hawking or Richard Dawkins told them to. They are little sheep. Most people in the world belong to flocks and herds. Don't follow the crowd. Think for yourself. 

What is form? What is content? You cannot understand what life and mind are unless you can answer these two fundamental questions of ontology.

 Magic, Matter and Qualia (The God Series Book 20)

Magic illusions are all about misdirection: making sure that the audience is looking away from what's really going on. For humanity, both religious faith and scientific materialism misdirect us away from truth and reality.

Magicians claim to pull rabbits out of empty hats. The God of Abraham pulls a whole universe out of nothing whatsoever, while scientific materialism performs the greatest magic trick of all by abolishing God and pulling the entirety of existence out of its opposite - non-existence - through nothing other than a random accident, with no conceivable explanation or sufficient reason.

Scientific materialism puts all magicians to shame. It manages to magic life out of lifeless atoms, and mind out of mindless atoms. That's some trick!

 Causation and the Principle of Sufficient Reason (The God Series Book 21)

The cleverest people in the world are those most capable of making the least expected connections between apparently disparate things. This book explains how light, life, mind, souls, causation, motion, energy, ontological mathematics and ontological reason are all synonymous.

Are you one of the rare few capable of seeing the light? Can you see the hidden mathematical order beneath the Grand Illusion presented to our senses? Only those on the verge of Enlightenment have any hope of understanding ontological mathematics, the science of the soul, the science of the unseen light of the Universal Mind.

It's all in the math.

"If then you do not make yourself equal to God, you cannot apprehend God; for like is known by like." - Hermes Trismegistus

 The Sam Harris Delusion (The God Series Book 22)

There are two kinds of intellectual: Philosophers and Sophists. The former seek the absolute truth while the latter seek the "practical" truth that brings them worldly prestige and success.

The Philosophers develop positions that rely on the highest intelligence and are as far removed as possible from the "common sense" of the mob. The common herd hold Philosophers in more or less complete contempt. The greatest Philosopher of all was Leibniz, a man unknown to the general public, and relatively obscure even within intellectual circles.

Sophists are those who are forever invoking common sense arguments, making direct appeals to the mob, producing arguments based on sensory "evidence" (which they regard as unarguable truth rather than highly arguable interpretation), and who rubbish all reference to an invisible noumenal world of things in themselves underlying the phenomenal world of appearances. Precisely for these reasons, the weak-minded are far more influenced by Sophists than Philosophers, to the severe detriment of the intellectual progress of humanity.

Philosophers have a position based on rationalism, idealism, metaphysics and mathematics, while Sophists hold a position reflecting empiricism, materialism, physics and science.

One of the most prominent Sophists in today's world is Sam Harris, an American controversialist who supports scientism, atheism, and the claim that free will is illusory. All of his positions are closely connected, and the purpose of this book is to expose the fallacies that lie at the heart of the Sophists' worldview, and Harris's in particular.

Ultimately, the difference between Philosophy and Sophistry reduces to the difference between mathematics and science, and how each relates to ultimate reality.

Any theory - any theory at all - that begins with false assumptions will produce false results. Therefore, the most fundamental task of all is to examine and get right the assumptions that underlie a theory. How do science's fundamental assumptions stand up to scrutiny? Science falls apart at a particular aspect of existence that can be defined exactly - at singularities. The whole logic of science collapses when singularities are encountered. This is fantastically problematic for science given that black holes are centred on singularities, photons are singularities, and the whole of the Big Bang Universe came from a Singularity.

 The Science of Monads (The God Series Book 24)

If a scientific materialist were asked to sum up his belief system, he might reflect exactly what Richard Feynman, a pope of science, said: "If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generation of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms - little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied."

Scientific materialism isn't the only type of science. Leibniz, the great German genius, was a champion of scientific idealism. The atoms in his system weren't physical, but mental, and he named them monads. To counter Feynman's position, a present-day Leibniz might say, "All things are made from mental atoms, which are simple mathematical substances from which all compounds are mathematically derived via the laws of ontological mathematics. Monads are expressed through constant motion, and that mental motion is what we call thinking. Pure thinking takes place in an immaterial, mathematical frequency domain outside space and time. By virtue of Fourier mathematics, frequency functions can be represented in a spacetime domain, and this domain is what is known as the physical world of matter. It is not 'physical' in any true sense. It's just a certain mode of mental functionality. There is no such thing as scientific matter. There is only mind. A mind is a monad, and monads are all there are. Everything is an expression of monadic, mental mathematics."

Well, who's right between Feynman and the modern Leibniz? Both are scientists, but Feynman is a materialist who believes in material atoms in spacetime as the basis of our reality, while the modern Leibniz is an idealist who posits mental, mathematical atoms in an immaterial frequency domain as the ground of existence. Feynman is an empiricist who believes in sensory experiments as the source of reliable evidence, while the modern Leibniz is a rationalist who advocates mathematical reason as the source of provable Truth. These are two wholly opposed worldviews, at war with each other.

Scientific materialists imagine themselves clear thinkers opposed to believers in silly Mythos religions, but those are not their real enemies. Their true opponents are mathematical rationalists who advocate reason and intellect over the senses and experience. The Truths of reality are not sensory, contingent, empirical "truths" of fact. They are non-sensory, eternal, necessary, non-empirical truths of reason. Only one subject can capture the eternal truths of reason: ontological mathematics. Scientific materialism won't help you one jot.

Science is about the mundane, visible world. Religion is about the transcendent, invisible world. Atheists believe that science is the only way to explain the world. Agnostics think it's the best way. But is science actually a system of explanation at all, or merely a good problem-solving tool and method that achieves practical success in the observable world? Isn't science, like God, in need of an explanation? What is its ontological and epistemological basis? What limitations does it have? How does it define "Truth"?

The Forbidden History of Science (The God Series Book 26) 

"The problem is not to find the answer, it's to face the answer." - Terence McKenna

At school, you are taught "science". You are not taught the history of science, so you have no idea how science came to be the institution it now is. Above all, you have no idea that science is a vast, rigid system of dogmatism and ideology, an inflexible paradigm, an incomplete and inconsistent set of heuristic fictions, a quasi-religious faith that, on behalf of scientific empiricism, explicitly opposes philosophical and mathematical rationalism.

You are led to believe that science couldn't have developed in any other way. You are never shown how science was offered numerous chances to evolve in a radically different manner, and how it always rejected those opportunities for ideological rather than "scientific" reasons. You are never taught the secret history of science whereby scientific idealism (based on the mind) could have become the orthodoxy, rather than scientific materialism (based on the body). You are brainwashed to believe that science is the only possible "rational" undertaking to explain the world. But science isn't rational at all. If it were, it would be mathematics.

In this book, we are going to do something remarkable. We will show you how easily science could have taken an entirely different route from the one it did take.

The heroes of this tale are Immanuel Kant (in his younger, Leibnizian years), and the Jesuit Roger Boscovich. When you reach the end of the book, we want you to seriously ask yourself whether modern science offers a better solution than theirs. Their system embraced mind in its own right (i.e. mind considered as something that does not owe its existence to matter), something that science signally fails to do, and refuses to do.

Why do today's scientists keep trying - futilely - to explain mind in materialist terms? Why does none of them have the gumption to explore the alternative history of science, which is driven by the mind and the dimensionless? It's because science is a religion, and its believers are every bit as indoctrinated as those of Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism.

Read for yourself the astounding rival history of science, and ask yourself why science doesn't talk about it, and pretends it doesn't exist at all. For science, it's the supreme inconvenient truth.

Science is an overt conspiracy against clear, rational, logical, analytic thinking, and has deliberately and ruthlessly suppressed all threats to its dogmatism. It refuses to teach alternative views that would instantly and fatally undermine it. You will soon discover why it's so terrified of drawing any attention to the secret history of science ... the forbidden history.

One hundred percent of scientists think that Einstein's special theory of relativity is correct. One hundred percent of scientists are wrong. Isn't that astounding? Why is it so hard for scientists to see the blatant errors in Einstein's logic?

The central reason for the failure of Einstein's theory as an account of ultimate existence is that, like everything else in science, it denies the real existence of mind. Once mind is admitted to physics, Einstein's fallacies become obvious. To refute both Einstein and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, only one thing is required ... to place an eternal, non-sensory, mathematical Singularity at the centre of the spacetime universe. This Singularity is a Fourier frequency domain, but is functionally equivalent to a Cosmic Mind ("God", we might say). Because it's an immaterial, dimensionless entity outside space and time, the Singularity is undetectable by any scientific experiment, yet its existence automatically disproves all claims of scientific materialism regarding the fundamental nature of reality.

A logical, rational, analytic mathematical Singularity - demanded by the principle of sufficient reason - at a stroke demolishes science's entire Meta Paradigm of materialism and empiricism. It leaves nothing standing. Every theory of science - whether it's relativity, quantum mechanics, Darwinism, the Big Bang, the Multiverse, neuroscience ... you name it - is formally falsified by the existence of a Cosmic Mind.

Mind might seem like something vague and impossible to pin down. It's not. Mind is pure math, in fact the most mathematical thing you can possibly get. Mind is ontological mathematics.

To see why Einstein is wrong, you need to replace physics, based on matter, with psychophysics, based on mind. No scientist has the vaguest idea what psychophysics is, yet its conceptual basis couldn't be simpler. In order to revolutionise physics, all that's required is to add to science's spacetime world of matter, a frequency Singularity of mind. As soon as this is done, Einstein's relativistic arguments collapse since the Singularity provides an absolute reference frame that entirely conditions the spacetime world, yet is undetectable by any scientific experiment. This is only to be expected given that the Singularity is immaterial, dimensionless and not in spacetime at all. The Singularity reflects pure, analytic, transcendental, ontological mathematics. It's a mathematical object, not a scientific one.

This book shows exactly where Einstein's thinking goes wrong. It's a logical failure created by science's inability to understand what mathematics is ontologically, and to use mathematics correctly. This failure runs through the whole of science. Science is simply the systematic misapplication and misinterpretation of mathematics. Psychophysics, the replacement for physics, is the remedy.

Science is the Matrix. It can tell us about the Matrix, but can't tell us anything about the truth beyond the Matrix. To get to the Truth, we need the red pill. But science dispenses only blue pills. Science traps you in its simulation forever. It relentlessly promotes the Lie that the simulation is reality, and there's no Truth outside the simulation. Science, therefore, is the enemy of the Truth. Like any religion, it promotes its own ideology and dogmatism as the Truth. Math - which science can't explain - is the red pill that exposes all of science's fraudulent claims.

This book shows exactly why scientists will never accept any proof that Einstein is wrong ... because science is now effectively a religion that refuses to question any of its core beliefs. Above all, science refuses to confront its relationship with mathematics, and refuses to attach any ontological significance to math.

Are you a ghost or a machine? You don't need to be a superstitious believer to support the side of the ghosts. In this book, we will show that the ghost side has two faces: Mythos and Logos. The Mythos version of ghosts is laughably silly ... just read the Torah, Bible or Koran to discover how preposterous and irrational it is. The Logos version, on the other hand, is the most rational position you can possibly arrive at, that of hyperrationality, expressed through pure, ontological, monadic mathematics.

For people with a machine mentality (scientists and atheists), everything is about visible objects, and the denial of any invisible reality. For all religious and spiritual people, there's more to existence than merely what appears to us. There are invisible things - such as souls - and invisible, mental forces, beyond the reach of any scientific experiment, but, crucially, not beyond the reach of reason, logic and mathematics.

Machine people reduce everything to lifeless, mindless, purposeless atoms of matter: the ultimate little machines. For "ghost" people, reality reduces to dimensionless, mathematical singularities, which are none other than the hyperrational monadic souls posited by Pythagoras and Leibniz.

Ghost people subscribe to atoms (minds) with atomic number zero, i.e. minds/souls are made of massless, dimensionless photons. Machine people start with hydrogen atoms, with atomic number one.

All "ghost" entities are associated with zero and infinity. All machine people deny the existence of zero and infinity. Mathematically, these are the two numbers where the ghosts and the machines collide head on. For ghost people, everything begins with zero and infinity, the two numbers that destroy scientific materialism. For machine people, machines randomly magic themselves into existence from non-existence, for no reason and via no mechanism since this is the only way to avoid admitting that an eternal, rational, mathematical order of zero and infinity rules the universe.

This book is all about demonstrating that there are indeed ghosts in the machines - something that science routinely laughs at - and, therefore, that science is completely wrong in all of its claims about ultimate reality. Science is false exactly because it ignores the invisible ghosts - minds/souls - that animate the universe. These "ghosts" aren't ridiculous Mythos things of religious superstition. They are mathematical Logos entities. They are dimensionless, unextended, immaterial, autonomous Fourier frequency domains (singularities).

Math, not religion, is what refutes science. Math is the ghost that haunts science. Math is what science has never understood, just as it has never understood mind. In fact, these two facts are one and the same: math is mind!

All genuine intellectuals want to take down scientific materialism, to burst its bubble, to expose it as nothing but an elaborate heuristic fiction that's utterly bankrupt as far as telling us anything about ultimate reality goes. Science is the Great Lie that must be overturned. It has replaced religion as the immense fraud that all intelligent human beings must resist and expose.

 Gödel Versus Wittgenstein (The God Series Book 29)

"Without mathematics we cannot penetrate deeply into philosophy. Without philosophy we cannot penetrate deeply into mathematics. Without both we cannot penetrate deeply into anything." - Leibniz

In intellectual history, perhaps nothing has been more misinterpreted than Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Stephen Hawking, adopting the popular misconception, said, "Thus mathematics is either inconsistent, or incomplete. The smart money is on incomplete."

This book is about the titanic struggle for the soul of mathematics, and reflects two immense battles in which mathematics is immersed to this day.

Firstly, if mathematics is tautology, as Wittgenstein said, mathematics cannot be inconsistent and/or incomplete, and so Gödel's work cannot be about mathematics. If mathematics is not tautological, mathematics is necessarily mired in inconsistency and/or incompleteness, just as Stephen Hawking said, hence is wholly unreliable.

Secondly, if mathematics is non-ontological, it cannot say anything about reality. If mathematics is ontological, it's the only thing that can say anything true about reality.

There can't be a world where math is a bit true and a bit false. Either the world is wholly mathematical - in which case math and not science is how we must study the world - or the world isn't mathematical at all, in which case it's absurd for science to use math in its attempts to account for, or model, reality.

Math presents a deadly challenge to science. If math is real, we don't need science. If math isn't real, then science, which is so heavily reliant on math, is nonsense! The greatest challenge facing science isn't to define and understand the universe, but to define and understand math.

Of course, it turns out that math and the universe are one and the same. Only if the universe is mathematical can it be rational and intelligible. It must be entirely mathematical since a universe that is partly mathematical and partly something else would be irrational and unintelligible given that mathematical things cannot interact with non-mathematical things (this would constitute a version of Cartesian dualism where two incompatible substances cannot interact since they have no common ground).

To understand what math actually is, you must strip all non-mathematical considerations from it. Are you ready to ponder existence in itself - bare existence - shorn of all subjective experiences, feelings, desires, sensations, perceptions, mystical intuitions, beliefs, opinions, and interpretations?

What is naked existence? What is existence in its rawest, oldest, most primitive and primordial state? Until you understand that, you will have no idea what it is when you impose an appearance on it.

 The Holographic Soul (The God Series Book 30)

Where is your mind located? How does it interact with your body? When your body dies, does your mind die too, or does it have an afterlife? That's the mystery of existence. If humanity cannot answer these questions once and for all then it has no understanding of reality.

The answer is not going to be something obvious. It will require some great conceptual leap, hitherto unforeseen by almost all of humanity.

The ancients believed that a person was a reflection of the cosmos. A person had a body and a soul, and so did the cosmos. Is that a silly Mythos, or can it be intellectually defended?

The rational link between the ancient wisdom and modern knowledge is none other than holography. Holography is what allows scientific materialism to be replaced by mathematical idealism. Holography allows the soul, rather than matter, to be considered the source of reality. Mental atoms with atomic mass zero replace material atoms with atomic mass greater than zero as the basis of the world.

Individual souls control individual bodies, and the collection of all souls controls the collective body - the cosmos. All of this is the inevitable consequence of ontological Fourier mathematics.

The unprecedented intellectual leap that humanity must make is to conceive of reality as mathematical rather than religious, spiritual, philosophical, metaphysical or physical (scientific). Pythagoras understood this 2,500 years ago. He was at least 2,500 years ahead of his time (!).

Over 300 years ago, Leibniz, with his Monadology, adopted a holographic model of reality, whereby dimensionless monads created the illusion of the dimensional material world. He was ignored. So it goes. Humanity's greatest geniuses are always painfully far ahead of the game. That's exactly why they're the greatest geniuses.

No one who understands that there's more to the world than science needs to turn to God, religion, faith, spirituality, mysticism or metaphysics. They do, however, need to turn to mathematics, the world's most hated and dreaded subject. Where better to hide from humanity the Truth of existence than in the exact place where humans most fear to tread?!

The answer to existence has always been right in front of humanity - in the shape of math. It might as well have been hidden in the bottomless Cosmic Abyss!

Math in its pristine state is immaterial, non-sensory and outside space and time. Those are exactly the properties of mind. Mind is nothing but math. Mind is how math exists in itself. Minds are monads, monads are singularities, and singularities are Fourier frequency domains. From the collective interaction of all of these frequencies - from the vast interference pattern they produce - we get the spacetime universe of matter. It's nothing but an ontological hologram that comes inbuilt with mathematical forcefields that lend it the illusion of being solid. It's all in the math.

Mind does not come from matter, as science claims. The exact opposite is true. Everything starts with unextended minds = dimensionless Fourier singularities.

What comes after physics isn't metaphysics, it's math. Math is the ground of science. Math is the interior of science, mind the interior of matter. Humanity has made the error of regarding the outside as real, and the inside as an epiphenomenon. The reverse is true. The simple fact is that without math, science would be an irrational religion.

A mathematical universe is a holographic universe, a monadic universe, a Leibnizian rather than Newtonian universe. We are all living in a dynamic, evolving hologram, aiming to transform itself into heaven, populated by not one but countless Gods.

The universe is a God factory. Its exact purpose is to turn imperfect souls into perfect Gods. What could be better than that? Math is the divine language that makes it possible.

People can't reason. They don't even know what reason is. "Reason" is almost always harnessed to something that has nothing to do with reason. Believers in mainstream religion are feeling types who "reason" with their emotions, or with their mystical intuitions. They subscribe to narrative "logic", i.e. to a holy text by some charismatic prophet claiming to convey God's thoughts. They never ask why God doesn't communicate his message directly ... with no middle men, and no bizarre books about desert tribes from thousands of years ago.

No rational person takes religion seriously given that rationalism is exactly what is absent from it. Mainstream religion isn't designed for thinking types. It's for feeling types and intuitives. It's about Mythos rather than Logos. The only religion a thinking person would take seriously is a Logos religion, with no prophets, no holy books, no commandments, no ban on bacon sandwiches, no demand to wear strings dangling from your trousers, to grow a big beard and sport a funny hat.

A Logos religion is one based solely on reason, logic and mathematics. Such a religion exists ... it's the religion of Illuminism, shaped by Pythagoras, Leibniz and Hegel. It has at its core the rational study of the two numbers zero and infinity, i.e. the two numbers that define singularities (aka minds/souls), and which are the two numbers most incomprehensible to scientists.

Atheism is not the denial of the existence of God or Gods, it's the denial of a reality predicated on zero and infinity, i.e. it's an attack on mathematics, not religion.

Scientists are sensing types. Bizarrely, they claim to be on the side of reason. They delude themselves that because they reject religious Mythos, they must be advocates of reason. That simply demonstrates how irrational they are, and how ignorant of philosophy. As anyone with a modicum of philosophical literacy knows, the historical enemy of rationalism isn't religious faith but empiricism. All empiricists - all scientists - are opposed to rationalism, i.e. the existence of a rational order of reality completely removed from the human senses, which can only be apprehended rationally, logically, mathematically and via intellectual intuition.

No rationalist would have any trouble contemplating zero/infinity singularities, yet empiricists and materialists flee from them in horror. They are not running away because of reason, but because they are sensing types who are fundamentally opposed to reason whenever it opposes their autistic, sensory mania.

There is nothing in reason to prohibit the existence of zero/infinity singularities - minds - but they are inconceivable to sensing types, who deny their existence on that basis alone (an entirely irrational and anti-intellectual basis).

Science wages war against "hidden variables", but hidden variables are merely all the stuff of math, including mental singularities, which are not susceptible to sensory detection and interpretation.

Scientists are people of the senses, so it's disgraceful that they try to don the cloak of rationalism, even though they are explicitly opposed to mathematical rationalism, which addresses a more fundamental, noumenal reality than the one amenable to phenomenal science.

Scientists are anti-rationalists and anti-intellectuals, antagonistic to reason, antagonistic to the inevitable destination where reason leads us: zero/infinity singularities. These are the Leibnizian monads that define existence itself, but which will never be objects of sensory science. No Super Large Hadron Collider will ever detect a single trace of them. Scientists, irrationally, conclude that anything that isn't available to an experiment doesn't exist. They subscribe to the fallacy that absence of evidence is evidence of absence. No rationalist - no person dominated by their reason and logic rather than their irrational, fallible, unreliable human senses - would ever reach such an absurd conclusion.

Ontolgical Mathematics: How to Create the Universe (The God Series Book 32)

The universe is not made of non-analytic, scientific "strings". It is made of analytic, mathematical sinusoids, hence has an exact answer.