Free Will and Will to Power (The God Series Book 17)
Are you free, or
are you a machine that suffers from a delusion that it's free? Free will is
perhaps the most important subject of all because if we are authentically free,
scientific materialism is ipso facto false, and the world is in urgent need of
a revolutionary paradigm shift. This book shows that free will has a most
unexpected advocate - mathematics. Only in a mathematical universe can we be
free. Only in a mathematical universe can we have a soul. And in a mathematical
universe, free will is much better understood as will to power, and to have an
intimate connection with cosmic symmetry and "God". It's all in the math!
Why Math Must Replace Science (The God Series Book 18)
The greatest
catastrophe in intellectual history was to regard physics as real and
mathematics as an unreal abstraction. In fact, mathematics is noumenal (true)
reality, and physics is phenomenal (illusory) reality. Mathematics tells you
what things are in themselves, and physics tells you how they appear to us.
Mathematics is the perfect ground of existence, defined by the God Equation.
It's the source of causation, determinism and objective reality; all of the
things now formally denied by physics, which claims that observable reality is
indeterministically born of unreal, probabilistic wavefunctions.
It's time to
replace the scientific method with the mathematical method. It's time to
recognize that true reality is intelligible, not sensible; noumenal, not
phenomenal; unobservable, not observable; metaphysical, not physical; hidden,
not manifest; rationalist, not empiricist; necessary, not contingent. Physics
is literally incapable of detecting true reality since true reality is an
eternal, indestructible, dimensionless mathematical Singularity, outside space
and time. The Singularity is a precisely defined Fourier frequency domain.
There's nothing "woo woo" about it. It's pure math.
Physicists
suffer from a disorder of the mind that causes them to believe that sensible,
temporal objects have more reality than eternal, immutable Platonic
mathematical objects, and to place more trust in their senses than in their
reason, more trust in the scientific method of "evidence" than the mathematical
method of eternal proof.
Never forget
that sensory objects are just ideas in the mind. According to quantum physics,
objects are just the observable entities produced by the collapse of unreal
wavefunctions, and don't formally exist when they are not being observed. Niels
Bohr, in response to Einstein, literally denied that the moon existed when it
wasn't being observed.
The subject that
comes after physics is metaphysics, and the true language of metaphysics is
ontological mathematics. Physics is the phenomenal expression of noumenal
mathematics.
Mathematics has
one final wonder to confer on us. It provides a complete definition of the
human soul, which is, like the universe in itself, just an immaterial,
dimensionless mathematical singularity defined by the God Equation. As above,
so below. The soul is the microcosm and the universe the macrocosm.
Anyone who
denies that reality is 100% mathematical is simply too stupid for the truth.
Truth is not a democracy. It's not for everyone, only for humanity's smartest
individuals. As Robert Heinlein said, "Democracy can't work. Mathematicians,
peasants, and animals, that's all there is - so democracy, a theory based on
the assumption that mathematicians and peasants are equal, can never work.
Wisdom is not additive; its maximum is that of the wisest man in a given
group."
This book
comprehensively exposes the diabolical philosophical illiteracy, ignorance,
bankruptcy and irrationalism of modern scientific "thinking", most
spectacularly evident in the paradox of Schrödinger's cat, the standard
interpretation of which is more or less indistinguishable from insanity, yet is
taught as "fact" (but is nothing but an extremist expression of empiricist
philosophy).
Ontological
mathematicians are vastly more intelligent than physicists. It's all in the
math!
"Wisdom is sold
in the desolate market where none come to buy." - William Blake
The God Series
is entirely ignored by all but a handful of audacious souls with open minds.
You should always be proud of yourself if you study new ideas without being
told to do so by popes, priests, gurus, celebrities, "authorities", or the mob.
Scientists would never dream of reading the God Series. Yet they would all read
it if Stephen Hawking or Richard Dawkins told them to. They are little sheep.
Most people in the world belong to flocks and herds. Don't follow the crowd.
Think for yourself.
Mind and Life, Form and Content (The God Series Book 19)
What is form?
What is content? You cannot understand what life and mind are unless you can
answer these two fundamental questions of ontology.
Magic, Matter and Qualia (The God Series Book 20)
Magic illusions
are all about misdirection: making sure that the audience is looking away from
what's really going on. For humanity, both religious faith and scientific
materialism misdirect us away from truth and reality.
Magicians claim
to pull rabbits out of empty hats. The God of Abraham pulls a whole universe
out of nothing whatsoever, while scientific materialism performs the greatest
magic trick of all by abolishing God and pulling the entirety of existence out
of its opposite - non-existence - through nothing other than a random accident,
with no conceivable explanation or sufficient reason.
Scientific
materialism puts all magicians to shame. It manages to magic life out of
lifeless atoms, and mind out of mindless atoms. That's some trick!
Causation and the Principle of Sufficient Reason (The God Series Book 21)
The cleverest
people in the world are those most capable of making the least expected
connections between apparently disparate things. This book explains how light,
life, mind, souls, causation, motion, energy, ontological mathematics and
ontological reason are all synonymous.
Are you one of
the rare few capable of seeing the light? Can you see the hidden mathematical
order beneath the Grand Illusion presented to our senses? Only those on the
verge of Enlightenment have any hope of understanding ontological mathematics,
the science of the soul, the science of the unseen light of the Universal Mind.
It's all in the
math.
"If then
you do not make yourself equal to God, you cannot apprehend God; for like is
known by like." - Hermes Trismegistus
The Sam Harris Delusion (The God Series Book 22)
There are two
kinds of intellectual: Philosophers and Sophists. The former seek the absolute
truth while the latter seek the "practical" truth that brings them worldly
prestige and success.
The Philosophers
develop positions that rely on the highest intelligence and are as far removed
as possible from the "common sense" of the mob. The common herd hold
Philosophers in more or less complete contempt. The greatest Philosopher of all
was Leibniz, a man unknown to the general public, and relatively obscure even
within intellectual circles.
Sophists are
those who are forever invoking common sense arguments, making direct appeals to
the mob, producing arguments based on sensory "evidence" (which they regard as
unarguable truth rather than highly arguable interpretation), and who rubbish
all reference to an invisible noumenal world of things in themselves underlying
the phenomenal world of appearances. Precisely for these reasons, the
weak-minded are far more influenced by Sophists than Philosophers, to the
severe detriment of the intellectual progress of humanity.
Philosophers
have a position based on rationalism, idealism, metaphysics and mathematics,
while Sophists hold a position reflecting empiricism, materialism, physics and
science.
One of the most
prominent Sophists in today's world is Sam Harris, an American controversialist
who supports scientism, atheism, and the claim that free will is illusory. All
of his positions are closely connected, and the purpose of this book is to
expose the fallacies that lie at the heart of the Sophists' worldview, and
Harris's in particular.
Ultimately, the
difference between Philosophy and Sophistry reduces to the difference between
mathematics and science, and how each relates to ultimate reality.
Black Holes Are Souls (The God Series Book 23)
Any theory - any
theory at all - that begins with false assumptions will produce false results.
Therefore, the most fundamental task of all is to examine and get right the
assumptions that underlie a theory. How do science's fundamental assumptions
stand up to scrutiny? Science falls apart at a particular aspect of existence
that can be defined exactly - at singularities. The whole logic of science
collapses when singularities are encountered. This is fantastically problematic
for science given that black holes are centred on singularities, photons are
singularities, and the whole of the Big Bang Universe came from a Singularity.
What, ontologically, are singularities?
Descartes gave us the answer hundreds of years ago. Singularities are minds,
and from that single fact, science is turned on its head. Mind does not come
from matter; matter comes from mind.
The Science of Monads (The God Series Book 24)
If a scientific
materialist were asked to sum up his belief system, he might reflect exactly
what Richard Feynman, a pope of science, said: "If, in some cataclysm, all of
scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to
the next generation of creatures, what statement would contain the most
information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the
atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms
- little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other
when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into
one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of
information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are
applied."
Scientific
materialism isn't the only type of science. Leibniz, the great German genius,
was a champion of scientific idealism. The atoms in his system weren't
physical, but mental, and he named them monads. To counter Feynman's position,
a present-day Leibniz might say, "All things are made from mental atoms, which
are simple mathematical substances from which all compounds are mathematically
derived via the laws of ontological mathematics. Monads are expressed through
constant motion, and that mental motion is what we call thinking. Pure thinking
takes place in an immaterial, mathematical frequency domain outside space and
time. By virtue of Fourier mathematics, frequency functions can be represented
in a spacetime domain, and this domain is what is known as the physical world
of matter. It is not 'physical' in any true sense. It's just a certain mode of
mental functionality. There is no such thing as scientific matter. There is
only mind. A mind is a monad, and monads are all there are. Everything is an
expression of monadic, mental mathematics."
Well, who's
right between Feynman and the modern Leibniz? Both are scientists, but Feynman
is a materialist who believes in material atoms in spacetime as the basis of
our reality, while the modern Leibniz is an idealist who posits mental,
mathematical atoms in an immaterial frequency domain as the ground of
existence. Feynman is an empiricist who believes in sensory experiments as the
source of reliable evidence, while the modern Leibniz is a rationalist who
advocates mathematical reason as the source of provable Truth. These are two
wholly opposed worldviews, at war with each other.
Scientific
materialists imagine themselves clear thinkers opposed to believers in silly
Mythos religions, but those are not their real enemies. Their true opponents
are mathematical rationalists who advocate reason and intellect over the senses
and experience. The Truths of reality are not sensory, contingent, empirical
"truths" of fact. They are non-sensory, eternal, necessary, non-empirical
truths of reason. Only one subject can capture the eternal truths of reason:
ontological mathematics. Scientific materialism won't help you one jot.
![Transcendental Mathematics (The God Series Book 25) by [Hockney, Mike]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51MtW2RJPnL._SY346_.jpg)
Transcendental Mathematics (The God Series Book 25)
Science is about
the mundane, visible world. Religion is about the transcendent, invisible
world. Atheists believe that science is the only way to explain the world.
Agnostics think it's the best way. But is science actually a system of
explanation at all, or merely a good problem-solving tool and method that
achieves practical success in the observable world? Isn't science, like God, in
need of an explanation? What is its ontological and epistemological basis? What
limitations does it have? How does it define "Truth"?
Immanuel Kant, via his philosophy of
transcendental idealism, attempted to explain science within a philosophical
and even religious context. This attempt ultimately failed, but the project
itself need not be abandoned. This book shows, via a detailed investigation of
Kant's philosophy, that the only way to make sense of science is via
transcendental mathematics.
The Forbidden History of Science (The God Series Book 26)
"The problem is
not to find the answer, it's to face the answer." - Terence McKenna
At school, you
are taught "science". You are not taught the history of science, so you have no
idea how science came to be the institution it now is. Above all, you have no
idea that science is a vast, rigid system of dogmatism and ideology, an
inflexible paradigm, an incomplete and inconsistent set of heuristic fictions,
a quasi-religious faith that, on behalf of scientific empiricism, explicitly
opposes philosophical and mathematical rationalism.
You are led to
believe that science couldn't have developed in any other way. You are never
shown how science was offered numerous chances to evolve in a radically
different manner, and how it always rejected those opportunities for
ideological rather than "scientific" reasons. You are never taught the secret
history of science whereby scientific idealism (based on the mind) could have
become the orthodoxy, rather than scientific materialism (based on the body).
You are brainwashed to believe that science is the only possible "rational"
undertaking to explain the world. But science isn't rational at all. If it
were, it would be mathematics.
In this book, we
are going to do something remarkable. We will show you how easily science could
have taken an entirely different route from the one it did take.
The heroes of
this tale are Immanuel Kant (in his younger, Leibnizian years), and the Jesuit
Roger Boscovich. When you reach the end of the book, we want you to seriously
ask yourself whether modern science offers a better solution than theirs. Their
system embraced mind in its own right (i.e. mind considered as something that
does not owe its existence to matter), something that science signally fails to
do, and refuses to do.
Why do today's
scientists keep trying - futilely - to explain mind in materialist terms? Why
does none of them have the gumption to explore the alternative history of
science, which is driven by the mind and the dimensionless? It's because
science is a religion, and its believers are every bit as indoctrinated as
those of Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism.
Read for
yourself the astounding rival history of science, and ask yourself why science
doesn't talk about it, and pretends it doesn't exist at all. For science, it's
the supreme inconvenient truth.
Science is an
overt conspiracy against clear, rational, logical, analytic thinking, and has
deliberately and ruthlessly suppressed all threats to its dogmatism. It refuses
to teach alternative views that would instantly and fatally undermine it. You
will soon discover why it's so terrified of drawing any attention to the secret
history of science ... the forbidden history.
Psychophysics (The God Series Book 27)
One hundred
percent of scientists think that Einstein's special theory of relativity is
correct. One hundred percent of scientists are wrong. Isn't that astounding?
Why is it so hard for scientists to see the blatant errors in Einstein's logic?
The central
reason for the failure of Einstein's theory as an account of ultimate existence
is that, like everything else in science, it denies the real existence of mind.
Once mind is admitted to physics, Einstein's fallacies become obvious. To
refute both Einstein and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics,
only one thing is required ... to place an eternal, non-sensory, mathematical
Singularity at the centre of the spacetime universe. This Singularity is a
Fourier frequency domain, but is functionally equivalent to a Cosmic Mind
("God", we might say). Because it's an immaterial, dimensionless entity outside
space and time, the Singularity is undetectable by any scientific experiment,
yet its existence automatically disproves all claims of scientific materialism
regarding the fundamental nature of reality.
A logical,
rational, analytic mathematical Singularity - demanded by the principle of
sufficient reason - at a stroke demolishes science's entire Meta Paradigm of
materialism and empiricism. It leaves nothing standing. Every theory of science
- whether it's relativity, quantum mechanics, Darwinism, the Big Bang, the
Multiverse, neuroscience ... you name it - is formally falsified by the
existence of a Cosmic Mind.
Mind might seem
like something vague and impossible to pin down. It's not. Mind is pure math,
in fact the most mathematical thing you can possibly get. Mind is ontological
mathematics.
To see why
Einstein is wrong, you need to replace physics, based on matter, with
psychophysics, based on mind. No scientist has the vaguest idea what
psychophysics is, yet its conceptual basis couldn't be simpler. In order to
revolutionise physics, all that's required is to add to science's spacetime
world of matter, a frequency Singularity of mind. As soon as this is done,
Einstein's relativistic arguments collapse since the Singularity provides an
absolute reference frame that entirely conditions the spacetime world, yet is
undetectable by any scientific experiment. This is only to be expected given
that the Singularity is immaterial, dimensionless and not in spacetime at all.
The Singularity reflects pure, analytic, transcendental, ontological
mathematics. It's a mathematical object, not a scientific one.
This book shows
exactly where Einstein's thinking goes wrong. It's a logical failure created by
science's inability to understand what mathematics is ontologically, and to use
mathematics correctly. This failure runs through the whole of science. Science
is simply the systematic misapplication and misinterpretation of mathematics.
Psychophysics, the replacement for physics, is the remedy.
Science is the
Matrix. It can tell us about the Matrix, but can't tell us anything about the
truth beyond the Matrix. To get to the Truth, we need the red pill. But science
dispenses only blue pills. Science traps you in its simulation forever. It
relentlessly promotes the Lie that the simulation is reality, and there's no
Truth outside the simulation. Science, therefore, is the enemy of the Truth.
Like any religion, it promotes its own ideology and dogmatism as the Truth.
Math - which science can't explain - is the red pill that exposes all of
science's fraudulent claims.
This book shows
exactly why scientists will never accept any proof that Einstein is wrong ...
because science is now effectively a religion that refuses to question any of
its core beliefs. Above all, science refuses to confront its relationship with
mathematics, and refuses to attach any ontological significance to math.
The War of the Ghosts and Machines (The God Series Book 28)
Are you a ghost
or a machine? You don't need to be a superstitious believer to support the side
of the ghosts. In this book, we will show that the ghost side has two faces:
Mythos and Logos. The Mythos version of ghosts is laughably silly ... just read
the Torah, Bible or Koran to discover how preposterous and irrational it is.
The Logos version, on the other hand, is the most rational position you can
possibly arrive at, that of hyperrationality, expressed through pure,
ontological, monadic mathematics.
For people with
a machine mentality (scientists and atheists), everything is about visible
objects, and the denial of any invisible reality. For all religious and
spiritual people, there's more to existence than merely what appears to us.
There are invisible things - such as souls - and invisible, mental forces,
beyond the reach of any scientific experiment, but, crucially, not beyond the
reach of reason, logic and mathematics.
Machine people
reduce everything to lifeless, mindless, purposeless atoms of matter: the
ultimate little machines. For "ghost" people, reality reduces to dimensionless,
mathematical singularities, which are none other than the hyperrational monadic
souls posited by Pythagoras and Leibniz.
Ghost people
subscribe to atoms (minds) with atomic number zero, i.e. minds/souls are made
of massless, dimensionless photons. Machine people start with hydrogen atoms,
with atomic number one.
All "ghost"
entities are associated with zero and infinity. All machine people deny the
existence of zero and infinity. Mathematically, these are the two numbers where
the ghosts and the machines collide head on. For ghost people, everything
begins with zero and infinity, the two numbers that destroy scientific
materialism. For machine people, machines randomly magic themselves into
existence from non-existence, for no reason and via no mechanism since this is
the only way to avoid admitting that an eternal, rational, mathematical order
of zero and infinity rules the universe.
This book is all
about demonstrating that there are indeed ghosts in the machines - something
that science routinely laughs at - and, therefore, that science is completely
wrong in all of its claims about ultimate reality. Science is false exactly
because it ignores the invisible ghosts - minds/souls - that animate the
universe. These "ghosts" aren't ridiculous Mythos things of religious
superstition. They are mathematical Logos entities. They are dimensionless,
unextended, immaterial, autonomous Fourier frequency domains (singularities).
Math, not
religion, is what refutes science. Math is the ghost that haunts science. Math
is what science has never understood, just as it has never understood mind. In
fact, these two facts are one and the same: math is mind!
All genuine
intellectuals want to take down scientific materialism, to burst its bubble, to
expose it as nothing but an elaborate heuristic fiction that's utterly bankrupt
as far as telling us anything about ultimate reality goes. Science is the Great
Lie that must be overturned. It has replaced religion as the immense fraud that
all intelligent human beings must resist and expose.
Gödel Versus Wittgenstein (The God Series Book 29)
"Without
mathematics we cannot penetrate deeply into philosophy. Without philosophy we
cannot penetrate deeply into mathematics. Without both we cannot penetrate
deeply into anything." - Leibniz
In intellectual
history, perhaps nothing has been more misinterpreted than Gödel's
incompleteness theorems. Stephen Hawking, adopting the popular misconception,
said, "Thus mathematics is either inconsistent, or incomplete. The smart money
is on incomplete."
This book is
about the titanic struggle for the soul of mathematics, and reflects two
immense battles in which mathematics is immersed to this day.
Firstly, if
mathematics is tautology, as Wittgenstein said, mathematics cannot be
inconsistent and/or incomplete, and so Gödel's work cannot be about
mathematics. If mathematics is not tautological, mathematics is necessarily
mired in inconsistency and/or incompleteness, just as Stephen Hawking said,
hence is wholly unreliable.
Secondly, if
mathematics is non-ontological, it cannot say anything about reality. If
mathematics is ontological, it's the only thing that can say anything true about
reality.
There can't be a
world where math is a bit true and a bit false. Either the world is wholly
mathematical - in which case math and not science is how we must study the
world - or the world isn't mathematical at all, in which case it's absurd for
science to use math in its attempts to account for, or model, reality.
Math presents a
deadly challenge to science. If math is real, we don't need science. If math
isn't real, then science, which is so heavily reliant on math, is nonsense! The
greatest challenge facing science isn't to define and understand the universe,
but to define and understand math.
Of course, it
turns out that math and the universe are one and the same. Only if the universe
is mathematical can it be rational and intelligible. It must be entirely
mathematical since a universe that is partly mathematical and partly something
else would be irrational and unintelligible given that mathematical things
cannot interact with non-mathematical things (this would constitute a version
of Cartesian dualism where two incompatible substances cannot interact since
they have no common ground).
To understand
what math actually is, you must strip all non-mathematical considerations from
it. Are you ready to ponder existence in itself - bare existence - shorn of all
subjective experiences, feelings, desires, sensations, perceptions, mystical
intuitions, beliefs, opinions, and interpretations?
What is naked
existence? What is existence in its rawest, oldest, most primitive and
primordial state? Until you understand that, you will have no idea what it is
when you impose an appearance on it.
![The Holographic Soul (The God Series Book 30) by [Hockney, Mike]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51Tj8L%2BRtfL._SY346_.jpg)
The Holographic Soul (The God Series Book 30)
Where is your
mind located? How does it interact with your body? When your body dies, does
your mind die too, or does it have an afterlife? That's the mystery of
existence. If humanity cannot answer these questions once and for all then it
has no understanding of reality.
The answer is
not going to be something obvious. It will require some great conceptual leap,
hitherto unforeseen by almost all of humanity.
The ancients
believed that a person was a reflection of the cosmos. A person had a body and
a soul, and so did the cosmos. Is that a silly Mythos, or can it be
intellectually defended?
The rational
link between the ancient wisdom and modern knowledge is none other than
holography. Holography is what allows scientific materialism to be replaced by
mathematical idealism. Holography allows the soul, rather than matter, to be
considered the source of reality. Mental atoms with atomic mass zero replace
material atoms with atomic mass greater than zero as the basis of the world.
Individual souls
control individual bodies, and the collection of all souls controls the
collective body - the cosmos. All of this is the inevitable consequence of
ontological Fourier mathematics.
The
unprecedented intellectual leap that humanity must make is to conceive of
reality as mathematical rather than religious, spiritual, philosophical,
metaphysical or physical (scientific). Pythagoras understood this 2,500 years
ago. He was at least 2,500 years ahead of his time (!).
Over 300 years
ago, Leibniz, with his Monadology, adopted a holographic model of reality,
whereby dimensionless monads created the illusion of the dimensional material
world. He was ignored. So it goes. Humanity's greatest geniuses are always
painfully far ahead of the game. That's exactly why they're the greatest
geniuses.
No one who
understands that there's more to the world than science needs to turn to God,
religion, faith, spirituality, mysticism or metaphysics. They do, however, need
to turn to mathematics, the world's most hated and dreaded subject. Where
better to hide from humanity the Truth of existence than in the exact place
where humans most fear to tread?!
The answer to
existence has always been right in front of humanity - in the shape of math. It
might as well have been hidden in the bottomless Cosmic Abyss!
Math in its
pristine state is immaterial, non-sensory and outside space and time. Those are
exactly the properties of mind. Mind is nothing but math. Mind is how math
exists in itself. Minds are monads, monads are singularities, and singularities
are Fourier frequency domains. From the collective interaction of all of these
frequencies - from the vast interference pattern they produce - we get the
spacetime universe of matter. It's nothing but an ontological hologram that
comes inbuilt with mathematical forcefields that lend it the illusion of being
solid. It's all in the math.
Mind does not
come from matter, as science claims. The exact opposite is true. Everything
starts with unextended minds = dimensionless Fourier singularities.
What comes after
physics isn't metaphysics, it's math. Math is the ground of science. Math is
the interior of science, mind the interior of matter. Humanity has made the
error of regarding the outside as real, and the inside as an epiphenomenon. The
reverse is true. The simple fact is that without math, science would be an
irrational religion.
A mathematical
universe is a holographic universe, a monadic universe, a Leibnizian rather
than Newtonian universe. We are all living in a dynamic, evolving hologram,
aiming to transform itself into heaven, populated by not one but countless
Gods.
The universe is
a God factory. Its exact purpose is to turn imperfect souls into perfect Gods.
What could be better than that? Math is the divine language that makes it
possible.
Science's War On Reason (The God Series Book 31)
People can't
reason. They don't even know what reason is. "Reason" is almost always
harnessed to something that has nothing to do with reason. Believers in
mainstream religion are feeling types who "reason" with their emotions, or with
their mystical intuitions. They subscribe to narrative "logic", i.e. to a holy
text by some charismatic prophet claiming to convey God's thoughts. They never
ask why God doesn't communicate his message directly ... with no middle men,
and no bizarre books about desert tribes from thousands of years ago.
No rational
person takes religion seriously given that rationalism is exactly what is
absent from it. Mainstream religion isn't designed for thinking types. It's for
feeling types and intuitives. It's about Mythos rather than Logos. The only
religion a thinking person would take seriously is a Logos religion, with no
prophets, no holy books, no commandments, no ban on bacon sandwiches, no demand
to wear strings dangling from your trousers, to grow a big beard and sport a
funny hat.
A Logos religion
is one based solely on reason, logic and mathematics. Such a religion exists
... it's the religion of Illuminism, shaped by Pythagoras, Leibniz and Hegel.
It has at its core the rational study of the two numbers zero and infinity, i.e.
the two numbers that define singularities (aka minds/souls), and which are the
two numbers most incomprehensible to scientists.
Atheism is not
the denial of the existence of God or Gods, it's the denial of a reality
predicated on zero and infinity, i.e. it's an attack on mathematics, not
religion.
Scientists are
sensing types. Bizarrely, they claim to be on the side of reason. They delude
themselves that because they reject religious Mythos, they must be advocates of
reason. That simply demonstrates how irrational they are, and how ignorant of
philosophy. As anyone with a modicum of philosophical literacy knows, the
historical enemy of rationalism isn't religious faith but empiricism. All
empiricists - all scientists - are opposed to rationalism, i.e. the existence
of a rational order of reality completely removed from the human senses, which
can only be apprehended rationally, logically, mathematically and via
intellectual intuition.
No rationalist
would have any trouble contemplating zero/infinity singularities, yet
empiricists and materialists flee from them in horror. They are not running
away because of reason, but because they are sensing types who are
fundamentally opposed to reason whenever it opposes their autistic, sensory
mania.
There is nothing
in reason to prohibit the existence of zero/infinity singularities - minds -
but they are inconceivable to sensing types, who deny their existence on that
basis alone (an entirely irrational and anti-intellectual basis).
Science wages
war against "hidden variables", but hidden variables are merely all the stuff
of math, including mental singularities, which are not susceptible to sensory
detection and interpretation.
Scientists are
people of the senses, so it's disgraceful that they try to don the cloak of
rationalism, even though they are explicitly opposed to mathematical
rationalism, which addresses a more fundamental, noumenal reality than the one
amenable to phenomenal science.
Scientists are
anti-rationalists and anti-intellectuals, antagonistic to reason, antagonistic
to the inevitable destination where reason leads us: zero/infinity
singularities. These are the Leibnizian monads that define existence itself,
but which will never be objects of sensory science. No Super Large Hadron
Collider will ever detect a single trace of them. Scientists, irrationally,
conclude that anything that isn't available to an experiment doesn't exist.
They subscribe to the fallacy that absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
No rationalist - no person dominated by their reason and logic rather than
their irrational, fallible, unreliable human senses - would ever reach such an
absurd conclusion.

Ontolgical Mathematics: How to Create the Universe (The God Series Book 32)
This book explains how the entire universe can be created using just two ingredients: nothing at all, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR), thus providing the universe most compatible with Occam's razor, the law of economy of explanation. The PSR exists ontologically as mathematics, defined by Euler's Formula.
The universe is not made of non-analytic, scientific "strings". It is made of analytic, mathematical sinusoids, hence has an exact answer.
Ontological Mathematics - compatible with scientific rationalism and idealism in preference to scientific empiricism and materialism - will usher in the ultimate intellectual paradigm shift, as we transition from the limited human senses to absolute reason and logic.