Adam and Eve
began as bicameral slaves of Yahweh (Satan). He was their monotheistic God, the
only voice they heard. Abraxas trained them to listen to a remarkable new voice
- their own! And thus they became conscious.
consciousness? It is the ability to choose different courses of action, not to
be driven relentlessly by instinct, impulse and an authoritarian voice barking
orders at you. And one of your central choices is whether to cooperate with
others or seek to dominate them and make them do your bidding. A person who
helps others is "good". A person who wants to harm others and force them to
obey his will is "evil". The latter type of person is just like the Satanic god
who once ruled in Eden and wanted Adam and Eve to be his slaves.
pointed out, as soon as consciousness comes into existence so does evil. There
was no such thing as evil before the emergence of consciousness. There was mere
contingency. Evil is the outcome of choice, and meaningful choice is offered
only to conscious beings.
To eat of the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil means to become conscious - to be truly
human. Far from being anything to do with "Original Sin", it is what makes us
what we are.
Abrahamists are effectively going back to the dawn of time and replaying the
decision to eat of the Tree of Knowledge. Unlike Adam and Eve, they refuse to
disobey "God". They don't want to be conscious. They don't want to be human.
They simply want to slavishly obey Yahweh/Christ/Allah/Satan.
to eat the fruit of the Eden Tree does not exist exclusively in the past. It is
in the here and now. We are all faced with the choice. Do you want to be
conscious or not? If you do then you must follow Eve's earth-shattering
example, the most courageous act of all time, and eat the forbidden fruit and
become conscious. If you want to avoid being conscious, if you want to have no
moral responsibility, if you want to avoid the onerous task of choosing between
god and evil then pick up a Torah, Bible or Koran and become a bicameral slave
of Satan. Obey his malignant will and his obnoxious rules regulations and
commandments. Never think for yourself. Never seek knowledge. Be a retard like
the Muslims, Orthodox Jews and Christian Evangelicals.
Some of us
are becoming Gods, but most human beings are as far from that outcome as
cockroaches. They refuse to be conscious. If you are conscious then YOU DECIDE,
no one else. You don't look to any book, prophet or god to tell you what to do.
You use your own initiative, reason and morality.
Adam and Eve
became ashamed of their sexual organs because these were the ultimate reminder
of their bestial, ungodlike nature. If your genitals always dictate to you then
you are not a conscious being: you are an animal. And if you allow your bestial
side full rein then you will surely commit harmful acts against others. You
can't eliminate your bestial aspect because it's an intrinsic part of your
evolutionary nature, but you must be capable of controlling it.
Greece, many statues had enormous phalluses and just as many had tiny ones. Why
the peculiar discrepancy? The answer is simple. The ones with gigantic penises
were celebrating the power of Dionysian irrationality and bestiality. The ones
with small penises were Apollonian, emphasising the rational, non-bestial
nature of humanity.
human being understands that he will always be a combination of Apollonian and
Dionysian forces. Abrahamists reject both forces. They don't want to be
rational, and nor do they want to be carnal. The outcome? They end up like the
Muslims - utterly mad, chopping people's heads off for no other reason than
that someone half a world away burned a book. Are such people capable of
deciding between good and evil - or are they brainwashed to do nothing but
So, will you
eat of the Tree of Knowledge or not? Will you be conscious or bicameral like
the backward Muslims who mindlessly obey the Koran as if they were programmed
The Garden of
Eden isn't ancient history and isn't mythology. It's about our world right now.
Join Eve. Eat the fruit and become conscious. Become human. And then you will
be capable of the next evolutionary step: becoming God.
those who judge what is good and what is evil. Abrahamists simply parrot what
an ancient prophet said. They make no moral decisions themselves. When a Jew
says it's sinful to switch on a light on the Sabbath, he's reciting a rule
given to him as a child. He's not exercising any reason, judgement or taking
any personal responsibility for his behaviour. Do the millions of moronic Jews
who refuse to switch on lights seriously believe that God is checking on them
and getting ready to send them to hell if they dare to press a light switch at
a certain time of the week? Does Moses greet them at the gates of heaven, shake
his head and point to the day they turned on a light on the Sabbath. "Sorry,
it's eternal punishment in hell for you," he says sadly. "You should have used
candles lit the night before." WTF!!
As is freely
admitted by its proponents, the Bible is not a book of morality. It is instead
a book of obedience. Your task is not to ponder what is good and evil, but
merely to do what you are told. You are called "moral" if you obey and
"immoral" if you don't. In fact, you should be called a slave if you obey, and
free if you don't.
There is no talk of human rights in the Bible. No one has
any. No obligations are placed on God in the Bible. It's a catalogue of all the
duties and responsibilities people have towards God. There's no social
contract. One of the central features of the challenge to medieval kings was
that if they did not rule in the interests of the people, they would be
replaced by others who did. By exactly the same logic, any God who does not act
in the interests of the people must be rejected and replaced.
A very simple
question arises. Should God be accountable to humanity? If he isn't then we are
slaves. Just as no one should obey a tyrannical king, nor should anyone obey a
tyrannical God. If we can overthrow false monarchs, we can overthrow false gods
Just as any
healthy society should be based on a social contract between the people and the
State, so should a social contract be drawn up between humanity and God. No
"God" has any right to order a father to murder his son. No "God" has the right
to drown the world. No "God" has the right to send humanity to hell. A "God"
who does those things isn't God - he's the Devil. And the Devil must be
resisted, just as tyrannical kings were resisted.
If we are
conscious, free human beings then we must be able to choose our God - and who
would choose a God who hates us?
Abrahamist religions are slave religions. They are designed for submissives who
have no desire to take any responsibility for their own lives. The submissives
want someone else to tell them what good and evil are. The Jew or Muslim who
demands that male babies should have their foreskins cut off isn't doing so
because such an act has any possible connection with moral goodness, but simply
because a book of commands demands it. "Good" is to fulfil the command, and
"evil" is to disobey it. The commands might demand that you be willing to
commit the human sacrifice of your own son. To any moral person, this command
is the quintessence of evil but to a slave, to disobey the order would be evil.
something truly astounding becomes apparent: when Abrahamists and
non-Abrahamists refer to good and evil, they are talking about completely
different things. A non-Abrahamist regards Abrahamism itself as evil. Many
would define it as the expression of the Will of the Prince of Evil himself -
Satan. To be an Abrahamist is to be a servant of evil, a follower of the Devil.
thinks that murdering his own child is "good" because a voice commands him to
do it is irretrievably evil. If there is such a thing as "Original Sin" then it
lies in the craven, disgusting desire of generation after generation of human
beings to slavishly follow appalling and sickening orders and call them "good".
If you really can't see that plunging a dagger into your son's heart or
slitting his throat is evil then there is no hope for you. If you think a good
God would ever order such a thing, you're mad.
the literal inversion of the meaning of the words "good" and "evil". Every
message contained in the holy books of Abrahamism is, in the wider context,
evil. Jesus Christ may have talked of love and peace occasionally, but he also
talked of hate and war, and he never once repudiated the evil tyrant of the Old
Testament. Even the Devil can use honeyed words, but the sweetness simply
disguises the bitter reality beneath.
To eat of the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil means to be able to decide for yourself
whether a "God" that commands you to kill your son is good or evil. Eating the
fruit of the tree was forbidden because it allowed us to sit in judgment of the
person who forbade it. What is the most offensive thing to
Yahweh/Allah/Christ/Satan? It is that we judge him rather than he us. When you
can pass a verdict on the conduct of the "gods" themselves then you are
demonstrating that you have godlike capacities. Nothing is more horrific to the
World Tyrant of Abrahamism than that instead of worshipping him you should
judge him and find him wanting.
Have you ever
encountered a single Jew, Muslim or Christian who said that God was WRONG?! As
soon as you conclude that any of the passages in the holy books of Abrahamism
that condone murder, hate, greed, theft, genocide, human sacrifice, mindless
obedience, rape, incest etc etc IS WRONG then you can no longer be an
Abrahamist. The definition of the God of Abrahamism is that he is always right
and can never commit an error. Therefore if you use your own judgment to
conclude that he has erred then you have ipso facto concluded that he is not
God. Moreover, someone who arrogates to himself all the powers and privileges
of God, as the Abrahamic "God" did, without actually being God is none other
than Satan. That is the essence of the story of Satan - that he thought himself
God. In the tale of Satan and the Fallen Angels, Satan sits on God's throne and
a third of the host of heaven worship him. Where a third of the angels were
fooled, well over a half of humanity has been fooled.
Islam, good and evil were replaced by Halal (permitted) and Haram (forbidden).
A Muslim does not have to know the difference between good and evil but simply
between what is allowed by the Koran and what is prohibited. The average Muslim
then concludes that halal is "good" and haram "evil" - though there's no connection,
except an inverse one. Thus it is "good" to be willing to kill your son because
the Koran says so, and it's evil to be unwilling. In fact, if you refuse to
kill your son if Allah orders it then you are under the power of Shaytan who,
of course, tried to prevent Abraham from killing Ishmael.
simple. The tale of Abraham defines it. If you think there is nothing in error
about "God" ordering his holiest prophet to make a human sacrifice of his own
son then your moral compass is fucked beyond repair. This is quite simply a
story that could only ever be told of Satan and not of the True God Abraxas. If
you fail to conclude that a God of Murder - of the deliberate, gratuitous
removing of the life of an innocent boy - is evil then you yourself are evil.
You think "God" (Satan) good because you are as evil as he is.
on earth should be made to swear the most solemn of oaths whereby they declare
either their absolute support of Abraham's deed or their absolute condemnation
of it. We will then know who the evil people are in our world, the people who
stand in the way of human progress, the people who are resolved to worship the
Devil forever. All Abrahamists are beyond the pale. They are disgusting
monsters for whom no contempt is sufficient. THEY are the Original Sin that has
condemned humanity to misery and woe. To remove them would be to remove sin and
the Devil from our world. These Satan worshippers have made our world into
hell. What could be more obvious?
The God of
Abraham says you are damned if you don't kill your son if he orders it. We say
you are damned if you do. Which side are you on? Isn't it infinitely disturbing
that we should be having this debate at all?
someone brought forward an ancient black book purporting to be the long lost
Gospel of Satan, and that it contained a tale where Satan said to his most evil
disciple: "To prove your obedience to me you must kill your own son." (In fact,
just this command is given by the Antichrist to his chief lieutenant in the
film Damian III: the Final Conflict.) No one would have any difficulty in being
horrified and thinking Satan monstrous and the essence of evil.
But if Satan
calls himself "God" and says exactly the same thing in a book calling itself
the Torah, the Bible or the Koran, then half
of the world's population are willing to say that he is good, right, and
must be obeyed.
Yet the only
thing that has changed is that in the first story, Satan is called Satan and in
the second he is called God. Do you SEE? All that Satan needs to do to be
worshipped by half of humanity is rebrand himself as "God", then behave exactly
as he did before: slaughtering, killing, hating, maiming, destroying…etc. etc.
said, "I am afraid we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in
grammar." In the case of Abrahamists, they can't get rid of the concept that a
name refers to what it truly is i.e. to call someone God makes him God and to
call him Satan makes him Satan, even if "God" has all the characteristics
expected of "Satan" and vice versa. No one could deny that in the Islamic story
of Abraham, it is Shaytan, pleading for Ishmael's life, who is Godly and Allah,
demanding that Abraham commit human sacrifice, who is Satanic. So why aren't
the 1.3 billion Muslims able to work out which is which? Are they evil or just stupid?
Either way, they're a catastrophe for the human race.
Where is your
moral compass if you can't understand that it is not what a being calls itself
that matters, but the conduct he expects of you?
In the New
Testament, Herod is regarded as a monster for ordering the massacre of
innocents. In the Old Testament, "God" orders his prophet to murder his
innocent child, and no one bats an eyelid. Have two plus two stopped being
equal to four? What the fuck happened to the reason of Abrahamists? Where did
it go? Luther called reason the Devil's whore. Why? Because reason tells you
that Luther's "God" IS the Devil. Will you condemn Herod but glorify "God" for
exactly the same crime? Is that what it means to be a person of faith? Is faith
the purest irrationality? Is it in fact indistinguishable from madness?
Christ, the "Son of God" be taken seriously if he said to his apostles: "You
must kill your children if I order it." Yet "God the Father" said exactly that.
Jesus Christ never once condemned his "Father" or Abraham, hence is as morally
culpable as they are. How can any rational person have anything but contempt
for the impostor Jesus Christ? He is not Christ, he is Antichrist. What could
be more obvious?
condemn the genocide of the Canaanites by "God"? No. Did he condemn the
extermination of almost all of humanity in the Flood? No. Did he condemn the
appalling treatment of "God" towards his servant Job? No. Did he condemn the
incest of Lot? No. Did he condemn "God" for sentencing the whole of humanity to
hell as a result of the "sin" of Adam and Eve? No.
according to the weird Christian theory of the Holy Trinity, God the Father =
God the Son. Jesus Christ himself ordered Abraham to murder his son. If Jesus
Christ is NOT Yahweh then there is more than one God and Christianity is not a
religion of Monotheism. If Jesus Christ IS Yahweh then he is guilty of all the
crimes of the Jewish Old Testament. One way or another, Christianity
disintegrates. Either it is polytheism or Jesus Christ is the monster who
condemned humanity to hell because Eve ate an apple.
propaganda. Jesus Christ was a monster. He could no more save you than Isaac
could look to his father for protection from "God". Jesus Christ is a Prince of
Hell, not any kind of Messiah. Read the Bible. If you are not nauseated by this
tale of pure evil from beginning to end then you are surely a child of the
The fact that
billions of human beings have concluded that willingness to murder your own son
is proof of your "goodness" shows that an enormous proportion of humanity is
infected with the deepest-seated evil.
Afghanistan chopped off innocent people's heads because an American half a
world away burned a book. Good or evil? YOU decide.
murderers of innocents were certain they had obeyed the Will of Allah and done
a great and good deed to avenge Allah's "honour". Need any more be said about
the true nature of Allah? Who would worship this bloodthirsty, vengeful, evil
"God" other than bloodthirsty, vengeful, evil people? These are Satanists,
doing what Satan loves and craves, not Godly people. They are Devil worshippers
who call the Devil God.
Why does the
half of the world not in the thrall of the Devil refuse to call Abrahamists evil?
Never mind burning one Koran - all the Korans, Bibles and Torahs on earth
should be burned, and with them most of the evils of our world will vanish.
Is it not
remarkable that people can stand in pulpits and preach to others about
morality, about right and wrong, about good and evil, when they themselves
think that a "good" God would order someone to kill his own child as a test of
slavish obedience? It is terrifying that so many people who think themselves
"good" are actually Devilish worshippers. Anyone who thinks that being a
murderous slave of a homicidal tyrant is what constitutes being good is
ineradicably one of the damned.
Sin" is the concept that humanity is intrinsically depraved. Certainly, those
human beings who worship the Abrahamic God are depraved. But they won't find
salvation in the King of Demons that they worship. They must eat the fruit of
the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and become moral agents. Those who don't
eat are the damned. You can never achieve gnosis unless you are a rational person
No one can
tell you what is good and what is evil. It's for you to decide. That's what it
means to be conscious. That's what it means to have eaten of the fruit of the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. That's what it means to be human.